Lets show an example of what this officer was attempting to claim he could do:
Visually observe the vehicle and determine it was speeding BEYOND 1550 feet:
lets zoom in a bit to what the naked eye may see:
Now lets see how big the simulated beam is in the Stalker HUD at 1:1 magnification (zoomed in 10-20 times with digital video)
Now lets go to 1500 feet and check things out:
This is the distance he had finished his read by....1550 feet
So lets see (an example) where he visually looked at the target..........
and I doubt he pulled it all together 100 feet FURTHER out:
Lets say you're going 88 feet per second @ 60 MPH, he's got ~ 3 seconds to visualize and target the vehicle THEN obtain a reading....... Hmmmmm
of course, if your going faster, then he has less time.
I offer my opinion why accurate targeting beyond 1,000 feet just isn't realistic OR ACCURATE. :-)
-Suf Daddy
__________________
Speed detection makes errors. I can prove it. REPEATEDLY.
I'm no attorney, any method I describe may not work for you. You use my experience at your own risk. And as my experience,
this is not legal advice or be considered legal advice.
These are my opinions made from research and experience, sometimes using the technologies discussed.
NO part of my writings may be copied, or used in other writings, postings, articles or works without my permission.
Quoting from my postings ON THIS WEB SITE is allowed on this website for discussion purposes only.
I rent LIDAR and radar, even w/ speed signs!
LTI Marksman
AND Ultralyte 200LR, Stalker LIDAR, Kustom Pro Laser II, Pro Laser III, Laser Atlanta Advantage (R-style) and 6 Doppler's.
