View Single Post
Old 06-13-2008, 09:32 AM   #24 (permalink)
Laser-InterceptorUSA
Professional
 
Laser-InterceptorUSA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Central Florida
Posts: 1,424
Thanks: 0
Thanked 21 Times in 15 Posts
Laser-InterceptorUSA is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to Laser-InterceptorUSA
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TSi+WRX View Post


Although I understand why brother PMoth elected to mount his front LI heads the way he did, I can't help but want to see how his front LI setup - utilizing the first-run US-batch hardware - will do against the LZ-1, with no such mounting constraints.

I know that Ivan has repeatedly said that the Stalker "fix" was simply to reduce error-code occurrence on the earlier firmware, but we all also know that the Stalker's performance versus the early-box/hardware/firmware LI was something that was exploited by the "Goons" during their initial LaserStar marketing push.

It's obvious from later testing from a number of hobbyist groups that the current version of the LI is virtually "Stalker-proof," but I'd really like to see how the first box does, without the admitted limitations of PMoth's vehicle setup.
Precisely why I asked him to do this! I want to be sure that any and all issues with the LI, early or late, are made evident and that they are addressed with either proper mounting or replacement sensors and or CPUs if need be. I do not want poor performing versions of either on any customers vehicles. Period!

Cliff - C55
__________________




Last edited by Laser-InterceptorUSA; 06-13-2008 at 12:31 PM..
Laser-InterceptorUSA is online now   Reply With Quote