does the sti have better performance then the RX65?

[vandaleigh]

does it?

[a-casanova]

Read through the forum reviews and youll find out :wink:

[stealthJamal]

does it?

In my opinion, yes.

Here is a recent radar detector test: http://www.guysoflidar.com/radar-det...ctor-test.html

[happya$$]

It depends. A best sample STI will beat a best sample RX65. However in the real world it is hard to answer this question do to manufacturing variance

[jimbonzzz]

I say YES, the STi is more sensitive, at least on Ka. But if you operate an RX-65 in USA mode, it is close to the STi.

[carboncopy]

I own both RD's and even though I haven't done any scientific testing I feel the STi is more sensitive than my RX65 based on what I have seen on the battle field. I am very surprised how well the STi can detect from behind, it is ALMOST as good as my V1.

But, don't get me wrong the RX65 is a fine RD. It has good detection and it does real good sniffing out Ka, which is the biggest threat in my area. And it has good filtering, so it is a quiet RD while driving around town. I think you would be happy with either one. Just my .02.

[Toronto-radar-chopper]

STi all the way, but only if you need spectre proof. If not, save the extra cash and buy a laser jammer.

[Toronto-radar-chopper]

Did you not post similar things in other section of the forum?

[stalker]

yes for sure...better range and better laser detection...and STEALTHNESS!!!!

[spankyaf]

It's not worth the extra money for the increased performance... get the RX65 and put the difference towards a jammer