Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    K-55 land
    Posts
    414

    Default A positive note: BEL 940

    I decided it would be appropriate to say something positive about BEL to balance some of my criticisms.

    I like voice alert for band ID on the 940

    X-Band is more sensitive on 940 than X-50, based on a stationary radar reference. I have access to (low-power intrusion detection). 2X distance on 940 vs. X-50. 3X distance V1 vs. X-50. Note that these are very close range tests, so one musn't extrapolate to highway "miles".

    K and Ka band ranges seem fine.

  2. #2
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    65

    Default

    I've used a Bel 940 and a 985 for quite a while and the only difference I noticed was due to the 940 having less features. I program x band out on my 985 and that was my only complaint about the 940. Range seemed to be the same as the 985 (have the same guts?)

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-26-2012, 09:10 AM
  2. False positive J alerts on my 3.818
    By iflooru in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-04-2010, 08:21 PM
  3. False positive
    By thunderstruck in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 06-09-2006, 09:10 PM
  4. which side is positive?
    By Chaos in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-07-2006, 12:49 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •