Bel STi - Speedzones Test is Out

[Mackid343]

they said they exposed the sti to x k and ka. why didnt they post results of how it performed? haha then again, their tests would only show signal stregnth in bars so it wouldnt help much . hopefully when GOL and roy have their test in the coming month(s) we will hear the truth about this detector and if its really undetectable. i'm not saying SML lies, but just to verify what they did (and get useful radar detection distances)

[stalker]

This evaluation was conducted in accordance with accepted police practices for operation of radar and laser speed measurement devices as outlined by the International Association of Chiefs (IACP) and NHTSA.
Police officers observed, reported, and verified the testing procedures.

Attested To This 31th Day of October 2005

Carl Fors, B.S., M.S., President
Speed Measurement Laboratories Inc.
FCC Licensee RS Radiolocation KNNNN392
Certified Master Radar Laser Instructor-LES

The STi Driver was completely invisible to all radar detector detectors while maintaining a blistering sensitivity to all radar bands,



Visit our other websites:



Content/Graphics Copyright © 2005 Speed Measurement Laboratories, Inc. All rights reserved.


I dunno...somthing tells me it wont be invisable for long!!

[Radar Roy]

I'm still waiting for some guy called - Roy I think it was - to send me the first one

I'm still waiting and remember, I have to test it 1st!

[The Walt]

Boy this is interesting:

"The labeling must contain a FCC ID # of the detector and contain the wordage of “This device complies with Part 15 of the FCC rules. Operation is subject to the following two conditions: (1) this device may not cause harmful interference and (2) this device must accept any interference received including interference that may cause undesired operation.”


So did the FCC just put (2) in so they or any other government agency could screw us if they wanted to?????

That's just standard verbage for anything that receives signals classified by the FCC. You'll find the same labeling on a radio control car, or at least its manual. I think it's to protect other companies whose devices or transmitters may interfere with the operation of your "toys." By protect, I mean from lawsuits and such.

I haven't read the rest of these posts yet, so this might have already been answered. Sorry if so...

[SmaartAasSaabr]

Yeah I think it was IBM who made the FCC decree that all personal "computing devices" had to comply with Part B of the FCC rules. Which basically means, it isn't a radar jammer.

[GTO_04]

I would think that if the STi had better radar sensitivity than the current top models they would have been more specific in their detection range test results. My guess is that the STi isn't any better at picking up radar then the V1, the X50, and the RX-65. Otherwise they would have said so. They conveniently left that out.

Still though, it appears that the STi is totally undetectable, and that is a major accomplishment. If I lived in Canada, I would already have my order in! The pressure is on now for VR to answer!

GTO_04

[Hessen]

I'm still waiting for some guy called - Roy I think it was - to send me the first one

He probably used UPS AGAIN........but let's not go there.......

[Hessen]

The pressure is on now for VR to answer!

GTO_04

Let's hope so..... :wink:

[Hessen]

If I lived in Canada, I would already have my order in!
GTO_04

Nope.....not until Roy's results are in and it is confirmed that this RD isn't just a "Flash In The Pan" invisiblilty wise..... :wink:

[GTO_04]

If I lived in Canada, I would already have my order in!
GTO_04

Nope.....not until Roy's results are in and it is confirmed that this RD isn't just a "Flash In The Pan" invisiblilty wise..... :wink:

I suppose so. Better to be safe then sorry at $449.00!

GTO_04