Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 27 of 27
  1. #21
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Cobra Electronics’ New SPX Radar Line Features Double The Detection Range

    Quote Originally Posted by TurboDriver View Post
    1. I don't need a crystal ball to see the obvious.

    2. First you use Roy as a source then you say he doesn't know diddly - which one is it sunshine!

    3. I don't care if you care about the IRad's it was to show you that their performance varies, and when they say they are improving performance of a unit but do not say which of their MANY versions they are comparing it to then there is no base line to go by.

    4. Opinions of someone that says their RD performs fairly well are useless unless there is another RD of known kind to validate the performance.

    5. If Speedzone had to redo their test and got different results then how good is their credibility on the first test?

    6. The ECCTG test that you are not impressed with is about the most accurate recent real world, non-biased test of current detectors you can currently find - like it or not. If you disagree then collect a dozen detectors, radar guns, and many hours of your own time and do your own, then publish the results for everyone to see free of charge.

    7. V1 has upped their performance with V1 connection and is probably the best in range and quickness of any current RD in any radar band - almost proven.

    8. RD fanatics that are truly into all out-performance do not have Cobra's.

    9. Every post you have for rebuttal is just a bunch of blah, blah, blah, and never really PROVE your point or address the point in clarity.

    10. I can't believe I'm wasting my time debating this with you.

    11. When these SPX units come out and are world class RD's then send me a message and I will apologize - I'll be waiting until..like NEVER!

    12. I could go on and ,but I won't.
    1) you must have a crystal ball because you can see things that haven't happened yet. Maybe your a witch ?

    2.) your quoting a Craig Peterson test ? We both know you guys over there consider him absolute dirt and have said quite often so you should talk. LOL!

    you know the old pot/kettle thing

    3.) I really don't understand this part, as it's pretty convoluted all in all but I do know there is a brand new detector called the atom coming out that is suppose to do the same thing and it's got a different FCC id so it must be a different platform from I/radar. They claim it's a much more sensitive detector which it no doubt is. I will wait to see how good it is when it comes out and may buy one just to test it's radar sensitivity.

    4.) Again, I really don't understand this ? " of a known kind ? " A known kind of what and by whom? That amateurish testing group ? I'll pass.


    5.) speed/zones did this redo on request of whistler.

    Whistler no doubt gave them a pre-production model, as was said on the report, entered to get it into this particular test on time. Obviously the kinks weren't all worked out.

    It's actually a very common thing for manufacturer's to do. Ask for a retest when they finally are. Happens in car testing too. You didn't know this seriously ?

    well now you know

    6.) Non-biased hmm.

    Says you.

    I guess if one claims something is non-biased then that makes it so.

    Kind of like Honest Abe's used car lot.

    Why do you suppose actual REAL RD testers, you know the kind that do this stuff for a living, spend thousands and thousands of dollars to go to the desert and test detectors there ?

    For their health? The air ? The nice flat scenery ? Why do they bother to use actual professionally trained radar patrol police officers in these tests ? Why is the site testers all trained in radar operation by the companies that produce the radars and offer classes in it's operation?

    why do you suppose they have all the rd manufacturers in attendance to check that their equipment is being used properly ?

    Maybe they are all in cahoots and it's a big conspiracy and they pick the winners of test beforehand !

    Ya, that's it ! Why didn't I see it sooner

    7.) The testers at speed/zones no doubt tested the newest v1 version I am sure.

    8.) All out performance ? That maybe true to the naive. It's a illusion. Frankly, I have seen more then a few "all out performance drivers' say they have got caught multiple times with their uber expensive rd's set ups.

    They are under the illusion the detector makes the driver.

    It doesn't.

    Never has.

    Many fast drivers that know their stuff never used detectors and are ticket free.

    RD's are just a tool.

    Give you a bit of a analogy here I HOPE you will understand.

    IN WW2 the germans were behind in fighter development and had to keep using the Me-109 even though it was designed in the thirties and very inferior to the mustang in speed and other important criteria.

    experienced Luftwaffe me-109 pilots that knew their stuff STILL beat Mustang pilots on a regular basis.

    Until the german oil and gas installations were destroyed

    wonder why?

    then the Luftwaffe got jets that could run on still available kerosene

    they put many a inexperienced pilot in that jet counting on it's speed and new uber features to win the day.

    it didn't.

    Many a mustang pilot shot down a me-262 in fact.

    get the picture yet?


    9.) Ad hominem attack

    and easily dis-proven

    I gave you two professional testers to prove my point, one of which did a extensive test with numerous detectors in comparison and you completely dismissed them.

    10.) neither can I but that's your choice

    believe me I know the feeling

    but your just so darn right about everything all the time you have to teach people like me a lesson that you are !

    I completely understand your Highness

    11.) and I am absolutely sure even if that unit comes out and has range to the moon you will still have problems with it somehow.

    Seen it before

    Uber RD owners have to have some kind of excuse when their over priced trophies don't perform as they quite expect.

    12.) Thank god for small miracles
    Last edited by Buckdarma; 02-14-2013 at 09:25 AM.

  2. #22
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    97

    Default Re: Cobra Electronics’ New SPX Radar Line Features Double The Detection Range

    Once again blah. blah, blah. Analogies but no PROOF, and just like you said - you don't understand!


    You are the most dense headed, argumentative, condescending person I have ever dealt with in these forums. So get a job, move out of mommy's house, and visit the real world for a while - your acting just like my teenagers.

    This is my last post on this subject, so go ahead and have your last say, I notice you always do, must make you feel better.

    Good Day

  3. #23
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Cobra Electronics’ New SPX Radar Line Features Double The Detection Range

    Quote Originally Posted by TurboDriver View Post
    Once again blah. blah, blah. Analogies but no PROOF, and just like you said - you don't understand!


    You are the most dense headed, argumentative, condescending person I have ever dealt with in these forums. So get a job, move out of mommy's house, and visit the real world for a while - your acting just like my teenagers.

    This is my last post on this subject, so go ahead and have your last say, I notice you always do, must make you feel better.

    Good Day
    More Ad hominem attacks.

    No surprise here

    I'm retired and I'm pretty sure your teenager's act better then you do.

    and don't worry if it was a crime to be wrong you would have been locked up already.
    Last edited by Buckdarma; 02-15-2013 at 06:14 AM.

  4. #24
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Cobra Electronics’ New SPX Radar Line Features Double The Detection Range

    and lastly T/d I'll concede to you the argument if that makes you happy. I believe we both have more important things to do anyway.

  5. #25
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Re: Cobra Electronics’ New SPX Radar Line Features Double The Detection Range

    I love the new Cobra! It out performs any RD ever! Who can trust that other forum test? Ha! The Cobra even beats my V1! Better than the PMI that cleans the air! Oh! Oh! OMG! I have a temperature of 109 degrees!.....

  6. #26
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    770

    Default Re: Cobra Electronics’ New SPX Radar Line Features Double The Detection Range

    Quote Originally Posted by North Alabama View Post
    I love the new Cobra! It out performs any RD ever! Who can trust that other forum test? Ha! The Cobra even beats my V1! Better than the PMI that cleans the air! Oh! Oh! OMG! I have a temperature of 109 degrees!.....
    where did you get one N/A because they aren't out yet ? ;>)

  7. #27
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Heart of Dixie
    Posts
    1,926

    Default Re: Cobra Electronics’ New SPX Radar Line Features Double The Detection Range

    ROL! 109 temperature! Don't get it? LOL.......

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Escort Radar Inc. Files Suit Against Cobra Electronics!
    By Radar Roy in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-04-2012, 10:20 AM
  2. ESCORT Radar Files Complaint Against Cobra Electronics
    By StlouisX50 in forum News Stories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-21-2011, 10:12 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-29-2008, 03:40 PM
  4. COBRA ELECTRONICS SIGHTING!
    By JDS in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-27-2008, 01:49 AM
  5. Escort Inc. vs Cobra Electronics
    By Radar Roy in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 11-26-2007, 12:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •