SML's 2007-2008 test is up!

[Virion]

I just noticed it posted today. Too bad Bel didn't get the firmware fixed sooner.

[MEM-TEK]

Also, too bad SML did such a lousy job with their tests and with the way in which they presented their test results.

[Virion]

Also, too bad SML did such a lousy job with their tests and with the way in which they presented their test results.

Absolutely horrible and almost to the point of unreadable. Someone really should show them how to create a simple spreadsheet or graphs.

[MEM-TEK]

I thought the exact same thing when I tried to read SML's results. Aside from the obvious typos, I also noted some glaring errors and deliberate omissions of testing methodologies as well. The end result is that GOL is the only group which is publishing the most unbiased and reliable comparison tests of radar detectors and other countermeasures.

Its obvious that the goal of SML's test was to be assure that every RD manufacturer present would be able to take home at least one "SML Certified" award for advertising purposes.

[TQUILL]

I agree. They couldn't have presented the data any worse. I refuse to look at their website anymore.

[fordmustang]

I just noticed it posted today. Too bad Bel didn't get the firmware fixed sooner.

where can i cheack the sml results is there a website if so can u please tell me the website

[Virion]

I just noticed it posted today. Too bad Bel didn't get the firmware fixed sooner.

where can i cheack the sml results is there a website if so can u please tell me the website

www.speedzones.com

[proudNMAmember]

I saw it too.

[Virion]

Roy has it posted and it's much easier to read on his site. Speedzones is just not a good test anymore. They list the V1's as NA for no x band and no k band like it can't be programmed.

[Toronto-radar-chopper]

It was a waste of time to review. I'm a STi zombie and proud, it works fine against 33.8 for me and I get hits at least once per day.