Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 140
  1. #21
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    Just to clarify the Pass for the first runs was set to 8 second jam? Starting at 2000FT?

  2. #22
    Founder of Stealthvation
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    11,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dorcse
    Quote Originally Posted by Roundstone99
    One test spec I'd like to start seeing is how long (seconds) it took to get a reading. It seems like every setup on every system generates burnthrough, the critical question is, did the jammer provide enough time to scrub off speed in time? If you get a 500ft burnthrough, is that such a problem if the officer spends 15 seconds trying?

    Just a thought for future tests.
    If this helps.. both PMoth and crazyVOLVOrob started shooting at me at about 2,000 feet. The two Laser Atlanta Gun PT's occurred at just over 400 feet. I was traveling at approximately 30 MPH. You can do the math. However, keep in mind that LEO's don't always shoot from such a long distance. A clean initial shot at my vulnerable area at 400 feet (my side mirrors.. and that's where I believe those PTs came from as the guys panned off my right and left headlights to the mirrors) and I would be toast! But most LEO's can't shoot as good or as steady as crazyVOLVOrob or PMoth.. so hey.. I just might survive another day in the real world

    Cheers,

    Ed
    Volvo Rob shoots a lidar gun like someone with Parkinson's. I would jam his ass to the gun EVERY time!
    RIP Duncan my BELOVED black lab son 8/7/99-3/23/11. I will miss you DEARLY.


    http://www.criminalcustomzshop.com/


    LET THE BIRTH OF MANY TESTING GROUPS HAPPEN!











    You want to know what it is like doing something for the love and passion and not for the mighty dollar then look up GOL!










    buyradardetectors rocks!

  3. #23
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Roundstone99
    One test spec I'd like to start seeing is how long (seconds) it took to get a reading. It seems like every setup on every system generates burnthrough, the critical question is, did the jammer provide enough time to scrub off speed in time? If you get a 500ft burnthrough, is that such a problem if the officer spends 15 seconds trying?

    Just a thought for future tests.
    Great suggeston. Our test strip was about 2100ft long. Targeting began there while average vehicle speed was 30 mph or so. One could calculate the time it took to PT from that information. Keep in mind that we were not using typical police targeting tactics. We knew where to aim an when to focus on those potential weak areas.
    Puma Power!!!
    Don't be a lemming!! Follow your own destiny!!!

    Ducati Team 2013 FORZA DUCATI!!!!

  4. #24
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by happya$$
    Was Blinder tested?
    There were no "LED" jammers in attendance. Only laser diode jammers. I wish someone would have showed up with a Blinder or ZR3/4!!!!!!!!
    Puma Power!!!
    Don't be a lemming!! Follow your own destiny!!!

    Ducati Team 2013 FORZA DUCATI!!!!

  5. #25
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,468

    Default Re: Horizontal vs Vertical mounting of Sensor

    Quote Originally Posted by gadgetman
    Thanks for the report!

    Has any testing been conducted on mounting the LI heads vertical vs horizontal?

    I'm interested to hear your comments.

    Best Regards,
    Racer X has and his results were less than favorable. I would check his massive LI thread for those results.
    Puma Power!!!
    Don't be a lemming!! Follow your own destiny!!!

    Ducati Team 2013 FORZA DUCATI!!!!

  6. #26
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thestaton
    Just to clarify the Pass for the first runs was set to 8 second jam? Starting at 2000FT?
    Yes! Mthman30 discovered that his PASS system was in "optimum mode" instead of "maximum performance mode" and also it was set to 8 second jam instead of constant jam. That system sounds complicated but for the price, I am tempted to try it once these (238 pps) gun issues are sorted out.
    Puma Power!!!
    Don't be a lemming!! Follow your own destiny!!!

    Ducati Team 2013 FORZA DUCATI!!!!

  7. #27
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southern MA
    Posts
    10,127

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by thestaton
    Just to clarify the Pass for the first runs was set to 8 second jam? Starting at 2000FT?
    The first one I believe had interfearance with the Stalker LZ1 as Pmoth was trying to get the site inline

    Guns were tripod mounted for extra stability in addition to the steady hand of myself and Pmoth

    Spoiler: show

    Radar Detectors-V1 & BEL v995
    Laser Jammer-Laser Interceptor Quad
    GPS Camera Locator-Cheetah C100
    GPS Nav-Garmin nuvi w/Trapster
    CB Radio-Galaxy DX-949 w/Wilson 500
    Scanner-RS Pro-96

  8. #28
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    354

    Default

    [quote="PMoth"]
    Quote Originally Posted by thestaton
    I am tempted to try it once these (238 pps) gun issues are sorted out.
    Could you elaborate on this? Is racer X working on fixing this?

  9. #29
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    CT
    Posts
    2,468

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DougiesGoinDeep
    Quote Originally Posted by PMoth
    I am tempted to try it once these (238 pps) gun issues are sorted out.
    Could you elaborate on this? Is racer X working on fixing this?
    I am not sure if he is aware of the issue yet. From what I'm hearing, one of the heads have to be turned "vertical" in order to JTG the Laser Atlanta. On Sunday, Mthman30's heads were installed "horizontally" or the "normal way." His vehicle had issues with the LA and PL2. Don't forget his two outermost heads seemed as if they were pointing slightly downward. That could have also affected performance and so it was noted.
    Puma Power!!!
    Don't be a lemming!! Follow your own destiny!!!

    Ducati Team 2013 FORZA DUCATI!!!!

  10. #30
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    42

    Default

    I have a few questions ( sorry if they are newb questions )

    1-For the PASS test in the note section it says in red the following " 8-second jam. Optimun mode. First 3 runs." So this means that if it didn't shut off after 8 seconds we could have had JTG ? Right ?

    2-It also says " Solid jam tone observed for both runs " for the Stalker. Does this mean the tone indicated that the gun was being jammed ?

    3- what does JFG mean ? jam from gun ??

    4- The PASS test had 3 frontal heads and yet it was out performed by the LI with 2 frontal heads. I read something about the PASS heads being connected to a LPP box, is that right and should it have effected the results ??

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. GOL 2008 Laser Results Posted!
    By jimbonzzz in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 172
    Last Post: 01-12-2009, 09:05 AM
  2. 2008 Laser Test & LI?
    By radardude in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 08-24-2008, 03:49 PM
  3. GOL 2008 results leaked
    By ahmadr in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 08-12-2008, 06:38 AM
  4. In response-CT Laser Day Results. 5/25/2008
    By Fritter in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-04-2008, 07:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •