Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    2,961

    Default ATL Jammer Test Results

    Here are the Atlanta Jammer test results from today.


    Last edited by rocky2; 03-13-2011 at 07:32 PM.

  2. #2
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    134

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Nice meeting everyone.

  3. #3
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    2,961

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Quote Originally Posted by RedAlert View Post
    Nice meeting everyone.
    Yea, it was nice meeting everyone. I had a good time testing today. Also thanks to Cat4 for bringing all the guns.

  4. #4
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Georgia
    Posts
    31

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Looks like to me that LI has it!! Should have spent the extra $200 for the LI's

  5. #5
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    2,961

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Quote Originally Posted by f4ifrank View Post
    Looks like to me that LI has it!! Should have spent the extra $200 for the LI's
    Defiantly, if I had to do it over again I would have got some LI's. Now I am just trying to get my Blinders working reasonably well. They really need to release some better software soon. What I don't like is how inconsistent the Blinder units are they are great on some guns and suck on others. And even the gun that they do poorly on does not seem to be consistent.
    Last edited by rocky2; 03-13-2011 at 05:23 PM.

  6. #6
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    462

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Edit: Rocky, I think SLO_STI was also running his LE-10 during this test. this should be noted in results once confirmed.


    Very nice to meet everyone.

    I've got some work to do on my right rear tail light.

    This goes to show what we already know, testing is the only way to make sure the install is rock solid. My weakness with Passenger tail light wasn't exposed until the Stalker was brought out and the PTL targeted.

    Thanks to slo_sti for critiquing the setup and advice on squaring them up.

    MAJOR Thanks to cat4 as always
    Last edited by Cauhauna; 03-13-2011 at 07:13 PM.

  7. #7
    Rocket Driver
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    8,717

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    I want to appologise to Gwinneco and Stewpro. It seems we missed them at the meeting location and being the absent minded guy I am I left my phone in the car when they tried to call and figure out where we were.

    Totally my fault guys and I will schedule something with the both of you to make up for it. Guess I am getting totally senile as I also went on a 6 hour trip after the test session and forgot my suit case!!!

    Pleasure meeting everyone new and seeing all the regulars again.
    Valentine One (3.858 Ice Cream Truck, 3.812 in Vette)
    4 Head LI (On Vette) (7.11 CPU Regular heads front, HP Heads on the rear)
    9500ci (On Vette)

    LI Quad (On Ice Cream Truck)

    LI Dual (On SRX, 7.06 CPU)

    ProLaser II, ProLaser III, Stalker LZ-1, LTI Marksman & Laser Atlanta "R" (looking for an Ultralyte LRB)

    2008 Corvette Z-51 Coupe

    Escort 9500 ix (Cadillac SRX)

  8. #8
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    2,961

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Quote Originally Posted by Cauhauna View Post
    Edit: Rocky, I think SLO_STI was also running his LE-10 during this test. this should be noted in results once confirmed.


    Very nice to meet everyone.

    I've got some work to do on my right rear tail light.

    This goes to show what we already know, testing is the only way to make sure the install is rock solid. My weakness with Passenger tail light wasn't exposed until the Stalker was brought out and the PTL targeted.

    Thanks to slo_sti for critiquing the setup and advice on squaring them up.

    MAJOR Thanks to cat4 as always
    I will PM him and see if he had them on when Cat4 was shooting.

  9. #9
    Rocket Driver
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    8,717

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Quote Originally Posted by rocky2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cauhauna View Post
    Edit: Rocky, I think SLO_STI was also running his LE-10 during this test. this should be noted in results once confirmed.


    Very nice to meet everyone.





    I've got some work to do on my right rear tail light.

    This goes to show what we already know, testing is the only way to make sure the install is rock solid. My weakness with Passenger tail light wasn't exposed until the Stalker was brought out and the PTL targeted.

    Thanks to slo_sti for critiquing the setup and advice on squaring them up.

    MAJOR Thanks to cat4 as always
    I will PM him and see if he had them on when Cat4 was shooting.
    He had them on sometimes and sometimes he did not. Did not seem to make a lot of difference.
    Valentine One (3.858 Ice Cream Truck, 3.812 in Vette)
    4 Head LI (On Vette) (7.11 CPU Regular heads front, HP Heads on the rear)
    9500ci (On Vette)

    LI Quad (On Ice Cream Truck)

    LI Dual (On SRX, 7.06 CPU)

    ProLaser II, ProLaser III, Stalker LZ-1, LTI Marksman & Laser Atlanta "R" (looking for an Ultralyte LRB)

    2008 Corvette Z-51 Coupe

    Escort 9500 ix (Cadillac SRX)

  10. #10
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Driving in the left lane, 10 MPH below the PSL, with my turn signal on!
    Posts
    629

    Default Re: ATL Jammer Test Results

    Quote Originally Posted by rocky2 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by f4ifrank View Post
    Looks like to me that LI has it!! Should have spent the extra $200 for the LI's
    Defiantly, if I had to do it over again I would have got some LI's. Now I am just trying to get my Blinders working reasonably well. They really need to release some better software soon. What I don't like is how inconsistent the Blinder units are they are great on some guns and suck on others. And even the gun that they do poorly on does not seem to be consistent.
    Wait till you see the testing we did today!!!

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Northeast Jammer Test Results - June '09
    By crazyVOLVOrob in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 102
    Last Post: 07-04-2009, 11:55 AM
  2. Northeast Jammer Test Results!!!
    By tosi in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 09-07-2008, 01:25 PM
  3. Results from Aug. 17th RD Test Inconsistent with the Results from the Off-Axis Test?
    By ZJamaican in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 10:30 AM
  4. GOL Spring Laser Jammer Test 2006 Results Posted!
    By jimbonzzz in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 06-20-2006, 08:06 PM
  5. Guys of LIDAR - Laser Jammer Test Results Posted!
    By jimbonzzz in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 11-30-2005, 05:14 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •