Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Europa
    Posts
    106

    Default Can any one prove a RD is better than X50..

    According to some test some RD are performing better. But these tests are not in real life. Closed roads. limited speed. ........

    I have 9 real encounter videos. which proves me X50 is the best performing RD against Ka bant.

    So if you think that your RD performs better so prove it. Send the real encounter performance of your RD. We will see than.....

    Thanks,

  2. #2
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    973

    Default

    something is VERY fishy about those videos, i have an rx65 an original 8500 and a rev 5 x50, and i have never gotten range like that. something tells me you just were sitting in the car with the gun or you had your friend help you in that car :wink:

  3. #3
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Rottweiler Land
    Posts
    10,420

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by xrs9430
    something is VERY fishy about those videos, i have an rx65 an original 8500 and a rev 5 x50, and i have never gotten range like that. something tells me you just were sitting in the car with the gun or you had your friend help you in that car :wink:
    X2 :wink:

  4. #4
    Scratonicity Groupie
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    7,614

    Default

    sure guysoflidar.com

  5. #5

    Default

    First of all, it is Ka "band" not "bant" and the GOL has already proven that the Valentine One and the STi own the X50 on Ka band.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by didu_missme
    First of all, it is Ka "band" not "bant" and the GOL has already proven that the Valentine One and the STi own the X50 on Ka band.
    Even Bel has gone back to the older and more expensive G1S7 horns on their Vector and RX series detectors compared to the horn which is still used in the X50. The reason? Better Ka performance.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MEM-TEK
    Quote Originally Posted by didu_missme
    First of all, it is Ka "band" not "bant" and the GOL has already proven that the Valentine One and the STi own the X50 on Ka band.
    Even Bel has gone back to the older and more expensive G1S7 horns on their Vector and RX series detectors compared to the horn which is still used in the X50. The reason? Better Ka performance.
    did the 1st 8500 (non x50) have the G1S7 horn?

  8. #8
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,516

    Default

    I'm curious about the horn question as well. I have an X50 (Version 5).
    What horn is used within it?

    In my opinion, A Test is just that and most vary every time. There seems
    to be no " real " constant because of changing conditions and situations.
    Any of the $299.00 or better Detectors preform well beyond expectations for
    most peoples needs.

    Yes, some do have a few milliseconds better gain on the other but reaction
    time is slower then the chips used in these detectors. So yes one may be
    better technically then the other but in reality nothing is really gained.

    Would anyone agree on this?

  9. #9
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    582

    Default

    these pointless threads on how "my rd has a bigger penis than your rd" need to stop....

  10. #10
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    ^^^ x2, and that goes for ANYBODY with ANY Detector

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Ford desperatly trying to prove it's new PIs
    By Sector_15504 in forum Car Talk
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 03-28-2011, 10:46 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •