Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 95
  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default Explanation of the 9500I & TrueLock info (Tricks)

    "Entire Post Updated 11/18/09" I will update as new info/details becomes available/known, so check back often.Originally a 9500I post, updated with 9500ix info.

    My detailed explanation of the 9500I (The quietest RD, with the most sensitivity ever made) & TrueLock info (Tricks): http://www.radardetectorforum.org/co...earn-info.html

    I have seen allot of new 9500I users and wanted to give some of my insight on this very different RD (It takes time & effort to truly appreciate what the 9500I can do for you, and time to read through this long detailed post.

    Note: Other than the few added features of the ix (AutoLearn & Safety Camera Database), the I & ix radar performance is the same. TrueLock and the parameters at witch AutoLearn is based from are the same.
    AutoLearn works just like the 9500I’s TrueLock with the addition of the AutoLearn feature analyzing (over time) the source of radar signals by location and frequency. The ix automatically locks out this source at this particular location after ~3 passes. AutoLearn is supposed to unlearn a lock out if a particular signal is no longer present at a location that was previously locked out. Currently testing Unlock feature, will have update in later posts.

    Excerpt from 9500ix manual: ("When AutoLearn is on, PASSPORT will also UnLearn signals to protect you from locking out real threats. If a particular signal is no longer present at a location that was previously locked out, PASSPORT will unlock that signal.") We will see.
    So for now if the signal is no longer present the satellite icon wont spin, however if the specific signal is received again at any point at that location it will lock it out and show the spinning icon. AutoLearn works like the 9500I with the addition of automatically locking out alerts.

    The 9500I/ix is truly an awesome RD and the sensitivity/distance is excellent. The 9500i is a totally different breed of radar detector and certainly is in the top 3 if not #1.
    The features are truly awesome and what makes the 9500I/ix a top notch choice. From GPS & speed sensitive filtering, Marking of speed traps, to the USB that has good potential for the future.
    The 9500I at times is so quiet it's as if the 9500I/ix knows the difference between a real threat and a false alert. Its amazing quietness when driving through towns or through cities and suburbs, insure virtually every alert is real. This is a key point, knowing that over 9 times out of 10 a 9500i/ix alert is real means that you will pay attention and react to the alert appropriately and immediately. Don't get me wrong you will still have some falses but the majority of them are dramatically decreased.

    The only real negative is the learning curve for experienced RD users, they are not use to a RD actively monitoring threats and how quiet the 9500I/ix is to falses yet has the uncanny ability to alert to a real threat.

    The 9500I/ix should be mounted striate, level and as centered as possible with a clear view of the sky for the GPS. The Horn on the 9500I/ix angles down so I prefer to keep it very high in my car, but would probably keep it lower on a tall vehicle/truck.
    I got almost a 10% increase in range by making sure the 9500I was level, their is a nice flat bottom to the 9500I to make it easer to level. = http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...ase-range.html =

    My install:*
    [replacer_a]

    Section-1/\__________________________________________________ __

    The Reason for TrueLock: The biggest complaint from RD users is the amount of falsing, the 9500I is designed to dramatically decrease the amount of false alerts. You will no longer become so desensitized to common and frequent false alerts that you will be able to react more appropriately and quickly to real threats.
    A driver who hears an alert and does nothing because they here it every day is at more risk than the driver that has the quiet detector and jumps out of there seat when the silence is broken. A driver is more likely to react to an alert on a quiet detector than a "noisy" detector.

    What TrueLock does for You:
    TrueLock allows you to "mute" a specific false alert signal at a single location. This allows you to "silence" common false alerts in your area without the extremely dangerous risk and tactics used in other detectors that do this by users turning off an entire radar band or blindly ignoring/muting alerts in that area. The GPS capability allows the 9500I to know specifically where it is located at any given time and thus lockout the false signal frequency in that very small specific area without the risks associated by turning off the entire X or K band. TrueLock is nothing more than a very advanced means to "mute" a false alert area and not to have to physically press your mute button every time you pass that area. No more having to listen to countless local false alerts, no more repeated pressing of your mute button. Now when your detector does go off you will know its only because there is most likely a real threat in your vicinity.

    Section-2/\__________________________________________________ __

    To use TrueLock simply press the Mute button (a short total of three times) to confirm with the Passport 9500i that the signals are not an actual alert - the Passport 9500i then stores in memory received radar on your driving path with the signals frequency and its GPS location (Shows spinning satellite icon when locking out radar). If you wish to unlock a location you must have icon spinning in that location, then press the mute button 2 times to unlock it. This will unlock all blocked falses in that specific lock out point (presently there is no way to clear all memory of lock out points, you must go to the specific lock out point and do the above).
    TrueLock on the 9500i allows you to lock out approximately 30MHz wide blocks of false radar sources in each band (Does not lock out whole band).The 9500i cannot lock out Ka band signals (presently there are no typical falsing sources such as door openers or motion sensors that are Ka band signals. The Ka band frequency's are: 34.7, 33.8, and 35.5.).

    Note: A LEO's K band radar usually runs at 24.150.

    K-Band is split into approximately eight segments of ~30MHz recording blocks depending on how it has self-calibrated, and derived from the received radar frequency. Like so:




    X-Band is split into segments as well (13-15 MHz Ea), and derived the same way.


    When properly used, the 9500i's GPS based True lock technology can be very effective at locking out unwanted door opener signals on your dally commute. Pass the false signal at least several times on separate days in order to guarantee that this signal is, indeed, a false (in expert mode) then lock them out if the signal always seems to be the same. The 9500i records signals for a very short distance, approximately 1/10 to 1/2 of a mile depending on how many falses there are after you lock out the location and the signal strength. So make sure you use expert mode to see how many alerts you are getting in your lock out area before you lock out. Since the technology is GPS based, it is a good idea to lock out the door opener false when you are passing the false close, but most importantly along your driving route you want quiet. (This will prevent locking out additional unnecessary falses). Once you have locked out the falses in that area and TrueLock has stopped recording signals (Cumulative). TrueLock will lock out the specific frequency block/block’s you have locked out for less than 1/10mi with weak alerts, and up to 1/2mi with strong alerts from the signal/signal’s end. (I never had a lock out area greater than 1/2mi). It is also important that if a 9500i owner sees a patrol car after activating TrueLock you should unlock that location and set it for lockout again in the future when a patrol car is not present.

    Section-3/\__________________________________________________ __

    "Threat/Risk Scenarios"
    I found its best to lock out dally commute or areas you know well and have surveyed closely. This will help to decrease the chances of locking out a real LEO and understanding the falses in that area. Most of the below applies to manually locking out with TrueLock. AutoLearn will work similarly but automatically.

    It is a good idea to lock out the door opener false when you are close but passing the false along your driving route you want quiet (This will prevent locking out additional unnecessary falses).

    The 9500i records/locks all signals it receives for a very short time/distance, approximately 1/10 to 1/2 of a mile depending on how strong the signal is and how many falses there are after you lock out the location (Cumulative).
    Once the 9500I is powered down or self confirms (takes 1/10mi of no signal) It will lock out the false frequency block/block’s you locked out for approximately 1/10 to 1/2 mi from last signal received (total accumulative distance).

    Very important note: If you are too close to the false you can get a strong alert that can overflow into another 30MHz block (Ghosting), Therefore creating a larger lock out block. So try to lock out with less then 1/2 of a full alert, the weaker the signal the better. This will also help keep the lock out area small.

    Video showing locking out of K 24.150 speed sign signal... than alert/spinning icon for less than 1/10mi... than 1/10mi with no radar... than a new radar speed sign ruining K 24.150 and alerting:
    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VaR05Bi8l4"]YouTube - 9500I truelock 24.150 1/10mi[/ame]


    Old TrueLock Video concerns thread, and part of the reason this sticky was created: = http://www.radardetector.net/forums/escort/33087-my-blue-9500i-install.html =
    New TrueLock Video concerns thread (easy read): = http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...-truelock.html =
    9500ix truelock got me a ticket:
    http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...leo-today.html =

    “The Scenarios”
    1) In areas where police X band isn't used, lock out X band falses the first time you encounter them. (No Risk & best area for AutoLearn)

    2) In areas where police K band isn't used, lock out K band falses the first time you encounter them. (No Risk &best area for AutoLearn)

    3) In areas where police do use K/X band but never sit in that area it would be a Low Risk lock out point. You will most likely lock this point out. (You may not want to use AutoLearn and manually lock out)

    4) In areas where police K/X band is used and they do sit in that area it would be considered a (High Risk) lock out point (You may not want to lock this point out, or use AutoLearn).
    Contrary to some peoples opinions out there it’s unlikely to lock out real police radar. You would almost have to deliberately try to do it (especially after reading this post). Besides, detection range will usualy trump the small lock out area in the first place and provide ample warning/alert before the lock out point (react to any alert no matter how small). In most cases Auto mode will also do a good job filtering these falses if you chose not to use TrueLock/AutoLock.

    If you decide to lockout a false in a High Risk area to mute the alert you should still drive through the area with caution if you suspect any chance it could lock out police radar. The same rules would apply if you were using any non GPS capable detector and instead pressed your mute button in false area. Simply treat the spinning satellite icon in your display as a silent alert and proceed with your own discretion and best judgment.
    (There is all ways the option of turning off GPS when speeding in a "High Risk" locked out area)

    ix AutoLearn Risk scenarios: Use the above threat risk scenarios to determine the usage of AutoLearn. I suggest turning off AutoLearn in High Risk areas and manually locking out if you feel its safe. AutoLearn should be used sparingly and according to your Risk area.

    How one user uses TrueLock and probably the best way to use it: http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...me-ticket.html

    If you are still concerned about the unlikely scenario of locking out real police radar you can go to option 5, once you become more experienced with the 9500I/IX:

    Note: TrueLock can create a lock out radius depending on signal strength and amount of falses, so its best to lock out at lower than 1/2 full alert.
    : Less than 1/2 of full alert ~1/10 to 2/10mi radius
    : More than 1/2 of full alert 1/2mi radius.
    : And accumulative alerts.



    The details/Tricks:
    You can also help lock out a single false signal within multiple false signals and nothing else by locking the specific location and powering down the 9500I (It will also keep the lock out area very small 1/10-2/10mi).

    5) If they use K band in your area but you still want to lock out some falses you have 2 tricks you can try:

    5a. K band door openers can be close to the center of K band (24.135 to 24.165MHz), where most actual police radar is found. You can use the frequency mode (Spec Display), to see if indeed the door opener is near the center of the actual radar band (24.150) or see what your local LEO’s are using and not lock out near there ~30MHz block.

    Below results may vary depending on how close all radar is to lockout point.

    5b. If K band is used and you want to try and only lock out 1 specific false. Drive close enough to get the 1 false alert only (don't sit directly in front of false, and have less than 1/2 full alert) then: lock out the desired false signal, once icon stops spinning (you will need to drive at least 500ft or more while icon is not spinning) power down the 9500I then power it up. See video: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m7Txmo6RB6k"]YouTube - 9500I True Lock[/ame] .

    5c. Another way would be to drive close enough to get the 1 false alert only (don't sit directly in front of false, and have less than 1/2 full alert), lock it out, power down the 9500I drive at least 1/2mi away with power off (wont record other signals when off), then power it back on.

    These will help prevent the 9500i from searching for more signals after you lock out your desired one, therefore reducing the size of your lock out area. This will also help prevent the very small chance of locking out a LEO or multiple sources.

    If you use my TrueLock "Tricks" above correctly and intelligently according to your area (No Risk, Low Risk, High Risk) TrueLock should always work fine.

    Section-4/\__________________________________________________ __

    Expert mode with Voice Alert on:
    Unlike other modes you will receive a verbal notification of "Multiple frequencies detected" when receiving an additional and different frequency. The advantage in using this with TrueLock is if you’re at a previously locked out point and you receive a new/different signal the 9500I will bypass the lock out and show all of the current signals it is receiving with a verbal verification of "Multiple frequencies detected".
    If you can deal with the visually small read out in Expert Mode and react on the 1st beep or 2 I feel it’s the best mode to use all the time on the 9500I. The 9500i locks out all radar it sees so its best to use expert mode when locking out so you can see what the 9500I sees. std & spec mode will only show the highest priority alert but may still be receiving an additional alert.
    Note: If the two signals are the same band and fall in the same exact frequency block 30MHz in the same area it will show 1 alert.

    Speck mode:
    This is a very useful mode to use initially or in areas you want to know better. This mode will actually show you the frequency the LEO/false is using and you can determine what gun they may be using and its limitations.
    I allso find its useful for preliminary testing of false locations to lock out.

    In all actuality the "real world" is more likely to be safe than the perfect worse case scenario: Having multiple lock out's covering a wide band range in the same location with a LEO running the same power and frequency, plus you happen to lock out the high risk area (And there is a GOL guy taking videos :wink: ) It's unlikely, and to completely lock out and speed in a high risk area is just stupid.

    Section-5/\__________________________________________________ __

    Sensitivity- is very good, yes it’s not quite a V1 but that’s the point. I have had well over 15 saves and a few of them were over 1mi in KA and K around turns. I had a KA going full on then nothing, full on than nothing about 1/4mi later around a turn there was an off axis LEO I/O everyone who passed. It is as if the 9500I knows when it’s a real threat, and alerts you accordingly. GOL's last test the 9500I only was 2nd to the V1. http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...-truelock.html *** http://www.guysoflidar.com/august-2007/radar-detector-test.html *** http://www.speedzones.com/index.html

    Escort had been fine tuning the 9500I from the first 9500's tested. The fine tuning didn’t just update ramp up, but also optimize the component values in parts of the circuit for better sensitivity. Now the 9500I has sensitivity close to or on par with the V1 but is also quiet.

    Ramp up- This is a quiet detector with superior filtering so you will/should slow on the first beep or two because it’s as if it only goes off when there is a threat. Who wants all that noise when the object is to slow down as soon as it goes off anyway.
    There was a ramp up problem people were complaining about, the 9500I would go from beginning alert to full alert no mid range.
    9500's ramp up problem was like: 1-1-1-2-9-9-9 (jumps to full alert from a weak strength)
    There now is a flash available with new software to fix ramp up, and all new 9500I's with a build date after 4007 have it. If yours has the ramp up problem you can call and request the ramp up flash/update. You will need to send it in to Escort but you should get it back in a week or two. New 9500I’s built after November 2007 will have the ramp up fix incorporated in them.
    Personally I like the ramp up (quieter) so I won’t be updating mine, but I will be getting a new Blue 9500I.

    Section-6/\__________________________________________________ __

    Features are the biggest advantage of the 9500I/ix:

    Variable-Speed & Sensitivity Control. Highway, Auto and City. Highway mode provides maximum sensitivity on all bands (I suggest using Highway, it's still very quiet). City mode reduces X-band sensitivity. In the “Auto” mode, the 9500i provides automatic radar performance based on your vehicle speed. Under 15mph “Auto” is essentially in city mode and as your vehicle speed increases from the 15mph, the radar sensitivity (X and K-band) is set to maximum range.
    Note: 9500ix City NoX mode turns off X band completely. http://www.radarroy.com/archives/207

    USB data port
    Hopefully in the future we will be able to update but it seems unlikely with the new release of the 9500ix.
    UPDATE! Updates via USB are now available from Escort for the 9500I!
    connect via USB and update it by holding down the MRK and BRT buttons while plugging in the power to your 9500i, and continue to hold them down until the unit shows USB on the display. The 9500i MUST be in "USB mode" to read valid data!.
    https://www.escortradar.com/register/9500iregister.asp

    One of RD.net's users made a unofficial program for the 9500I here (The program is not by Escort):
    = http://www.radardetector.net/forums/...auto-mode.html =
    For now you can send in your 9500I to be updated to the xi softwair and a few new cool features for the small fee of $130.

    GPS-Powered Truelock™ Filter. You can lock out those annoying falses you go by everyday and not have to explain to people in your car why your RD is going off and there are no cops around. The GPS filter can be turned on and off. keep in mind when the GPS filter is off GPS is still being monitored for speed alert/display out.

    Mark Location Feature is for speed traps & cameras. Good for those traps set up on your not so frequently driven rides where LEO's use I/O.

    Speed Alert™ shows your current speed by using GPS. Actually shows your current speed when the 9500I picks up radar or you can choose to leave it on all the time.

    Voice Alerts. No need to take your eyes off the road, it tells you what band it’s detecting and what you are setting it too without taking your eyes off the road.

    Auto Volume Control. Cool feature for those business trips with clients in your car that you don’t want to annoy. Doesn’t work well for me, not loud enough.

    User-Selectable Preferences, Spec mode, expert mode and standard. You can see multiple threats or the actual frequency you’re being hit by. I prefer Expert Mode with its ability to show multiple threats. Spec mode is nice if you know your local LEO's frequency’s. And Standard is good for beginners or old school diehards.

    5 Levels of Brightness Control & auto bright. Very cool no need to worry about not seeing the display during the day and no worry that the cop behind you sees the blaring red display at night.

    VG-2 protection "the detector-detector"

    Mute, Auto Mute & Smart Mute. Another Cool feature for those trips in your car that you don’t want to annoy your passengers. Auto Mute will dramatically reduce the volume of the current alert after 4-5 beeps.

    Built-in Earphone Jack. You can also use this for out side amplification.

    Safety Warning System. This is a truly awesome feature if it was available everywhere.

    I am more likely to get a ticket because I ignore a detector going off with a lot of non LEO alerts than a quiet detector that when it goes off you react right away. In most cases you are going to have falses in places you can’t speed anyway (city’s, parking lots, many stop lights) so locking them out or using Auto mode will work just fine.
    The bottom line is I really enjoy the quite commute, and I am more likely to react to an alert on a quiet detector than when I had a "noisy" detector.
    Over all I am very satisfied with the 9500I and would recommend it to any intelligent RD user, Especially for City & dally commutes.

    Section-7/\__________________________________________________ __

    Last edited by CJR238; 06-29-2011 at 07:39 AM.

  2. #2
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,618

    Default Not true in real life

    I appreciate the info, but in real life, this detector can't possibly work as advertised. I'll give you an example: Everyday I pass by a Middle School and it has a K band transmitter at the front door. Using my X50 on Spec display, the frequency is RARELY the same day to day. Thus you could lock it out today, and if it is transmitting differently tomorrow, you should have an alert. For instance, one day it showed 24.136, and the next it showed 24.040. Common sense would tend to indicate that in the real world, it just can't work. Yet another example of an engineer coming up with an idea that doesn't pan out in real life. I think there will be alot of 9500i owners receiving tickets if they put their driver's license in the care of this idea.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default Re: Not true in real life

    Quote Originally Posted by bigalinwv
    I appreciate the info, but in real life, this detector can't possibly work as advertised. I'll give you an example: Everyday I pass by a Middle School and it has a K band transmitter at the front door. Using my X50 on Spec display, the frequency is RARELY the same day to day. Thus you could lock it out today, and if it is transmitting differently tomorrow, you should have an alert. For instance, one day it showed 24.136, and the next it showed 24.040. Common sense would tend to indicate that in the real world, it just can't work. Yet another example of an engineer coming up with an idea that doesn't pan out in real life. I think there will be alot of 9500i owners receiving tickets if they put their driver's license in the care of this idea.
    The 9500i will alert you if there is a different frequency (like your example above) from the one you locked out previously the day before. You can lock the new frequency out as well if you choose. The 9500I works as advertised, just not how non 9500I owners want it to. :roll:

    If you are concerned that too many segments are being blocked in a lock out point you need to ask your self a few questions:

    Do the LEO's use K band at all in your area? If not this would be considered a no risk K band lock out point. Lock it out.

    If they do use K band but never sit in that area it would be a low risk lock out point. You will most likely lock this point out.

    If they do use K band and they do sit in that location it would be considered a high risk lock out point. So you may not want to lock out this point, but the other 5 low risk on your every day rout are, and boy are you happy because of the peace and quiet.
    It’s your choice to lock out a location not the 9500I's, that’s why you should only lock out dally commute or areas you know well (As explained in my original post).
    You can also lock out a single false signal within multiples and nothing else by locking the specific signal than immediately powering down the 9500I. :wink:

    In all actuality the "real world" is more likely to be safe than the perfect worse case scenario. Having multiple lock out's covering a wide band range in the same location with a LEO running the same power and frequency, plus you happen to lock out the high risk area. It's unlikely, and to lock out a high risk area is just stupid.

  4. #4
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,618

    Default I see

    I see what you are saying, but I think the vast majority of people aren't going to go through alot of thinking about one particulaer area, they would just lock it out and forget about it. My only concern is that if you lock out say 2 or 3 different frequencies at the same location, and a LEO is sitting there shooting on one of those frequencies, what happens??

    I am not trying to say it is a bad detector, it's just that the technology is not foolproof, and most people, particularly after paying $450 for a detector, will more than likely get frustrated because it won't do what they thought it would do. I, myself, was shocked to see the different frequencies coming out of one door K band transmitter. I assumed if it showed 24.165 today, it would show 24.165 tomorrow. Just today I found the same problem at my local supermarket, just within minutes, the frequency was different, off by about .004

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default Re: I see

    Quote Originally Posted by bigalinwv
    I see what you are saying, but I think the vast majority of people aren't going to go through alot of thinking about one particulaer area, they would just lock it out and forget about it. My only concern is that if you lock out say 2 or 3 different frequencies at the same location, and a LEO is sitting there shooting on one of those frequencies, what happens??

    I am not trying to say it is a bad detector, it's just that the technology is not foolproof, and most people, particularly after paying $450 for a detector, will more than likely get frustrated because it won't do what they thought it would do. I, myself, was shocked to see the different frequencies coming out of one door K band transmitter. I assumed if it showed 24.165 today, it would show 24.165 tomorrow. Just today I found the same problem at my local supermarket, just within minutes, the frequency was different, off by about .004
    Agreed. That’s why I made my detailed explanation above for the people lucky enough to find this forum. Escort didn’t do there job explaining the 9500I in as much detail as they should have. They described the 9500I in general safe legal terms so it would do exactly as advertised and not how people would interpret what they wrote. :?
    I feel bad for the people who just blindly trust any technology with out thinking, remember Y2K. :wink:

    Look at Escorts futile attempt to describe true lock better:
    http://www.escortradar.com/9500i-tech-talk.htm

  6. #6

    Default Re: Not true in real life

    Quote Originally Posted by bigalinwv
    I appreciate the info, but in real life, this detector can't possibly work as advertised. I'll give you an example: Everyday I pass by a Middle School and it has a K band transmitter at the front door. Using my X50 on Spec display, the frequency is RARELY the same day to day. Thus you could lock it out today, and if it is transmitting differently tomorrow, you should have an alert. For instance, one day it showed 24.136, and the next it showed 24.040. Common sense would tend to indicate that in the real world, it just can't work. Yet another example of an engineer coming up with an idea that doesn't pan out in real life. I think there will be alot of 9500i owners receiving tickets if they put their driver's license in the care of this idea.
    Hi bigalinwv,

    I'm just gonna take a wild guess, but you must be big Al in West Virginia? I am joking with regards to the explain your user name thread.

    Anyway, your X50 showing 24.136 and then 24.040 is a pretty big difference. Remember that every door opener has a pair of transmitters with each pointed to opposite sides of the door. I suspect that your X50 in tech mode was displaying either one or the other transmitter frequencies. My V995, RX65 and STi are more consistent than this, but this really doesn't matter. What does matter is that Escort engineers already considered that each auto-calibration sequence doesn't result in their radar detectors always displaying the exact same frequency for radar. They chose eight segments for K band since each 30MHz segment is somewhat wider than the random frequency drift associated with each auto-calibration sequence. Escort fully addressed this issue in their patent for the technology used in the 9500i. See my post which explains how they get around this frequency drift issue:

    In-depth info about how TrueLock is supposed to work...

    Their solution to this problem actually is pretty neat.

    Best Regards,

    --Michael

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    Update:

    Just changed my 9500I setting to Expert mode and to my great surprise the audible voice said "Multiple frequencies detected"! Not only will it show how many bands in expert mode but the 9500I will verbally tell you if the 9500I is receiving multiple radar alerts at the same time.

    Saved my butt... It was a K band sign and a LEO was running K band just passed the sign around a bend in the road.

    Sneaky LEO's.

    I will never change it from Expert mode again. :twisted:

    Also had a lock out point that got a new K band signal while the icon was spinning and the 9500 said "Multiple frequencies detected". I will do some more tests with Expert Mode on lock out points to see if this is the best setting to use all the time.

  8. #8
    Speedtrap Crasher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    6,732

    Default

    I'm really glad this thread was posted. I've been waiting for some people to thoroughly break down this multiple threat issue. I'm the type of guy that will drive by falses over and over again to lock out multiple signals but if the 9500 tells you there are multiple frequencies even better.

    Sounds like a good unit just not very user friendly. Which was my initial complaint about the SR7. You have to study it in spec mode for almost two weeks before you understand how it's working.
    Project "BONES" Speed Lab:
    Valentine One, Blinder M47 "All Front Configuration"
    Pro97 Police Scanner
    1 Saves / 3 Strikes as of 8/22/2009
    Estimated saves in U.S. Dollars: $200

  9. #9
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    My Home
    Posts
    3,169

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by erickonphoenix
    I'm really glad this thread was posted. I've been waiting for some people to thoroughly break down this multiple threat issue. I'm the type of guy that will drive by falses over and over again to lock out multiple signals but if the 9500 tells you there are multiple frequencies even better.
    It does not happen all the time and is not consistent when detecting multiple frequencies. The flaw that escort used in their units is not able to isolate same or close frequencies. The expert mode or multi threat alerts are frequency based in segments. I've seen frquencies with a difference of +/- .025 mhz in one area but will only show 1 bogey in expert mode. The truelock feature seems to use the same technology the expert mode feature works as far as locking out signals with same to close frequencies.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default

    [A MUST READ]


    Today in expert mode my 9500I got a KA band alert where it usually blocks out K band and again I got "Multiple frequencies detected". Apparently the 9500I when receiving a New/different alert in Expert mode at a previously locked out point it will bypass the lock out and alert of all current signals it is receiving.

    If you can deal with the visually small read out in Expert Mode and react on the 1st beep I feel it’s the best mode to use all the time on the 9500I.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. new guy looking for some tips, tricks and non bias info
    By I-wanna-go-fast in forum Introduce Yourself
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-28-2009, 12:55 AM
  2. Explanation of the V1 & J OUT info (Tricks)
    By happya$$ in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 08-25-2009, 09:18 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 06:53 AM
  4. 9500I Truelock & GPS Questions
    By BO13MWZ in forum Escort
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 10:45 AM
  5. 9500i TrueLock testing on the bench - Take II
    By jimbonzzz in forum Escort
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-10-2007, 12:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •