Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 21
  1. #1
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Readstown, WI
    Posts
    118

    Default Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    I have noticed on some GOL results or similar that they have it marked 9500ix (GPS Off) and (GPS On). Does the GPS function even directly interfere with the signal? It doesn't seem like it would. Maybe a small amount if at all?

    Thanks
    ~Chris

  2. #2
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    106

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by GDXChris View Post
    I have noticed on some GOL results or similar that they have it marked 9500ix (GPS Off) and (GPS On). Does the GPS function even directly interfere with the signal? It doesn't seem like it would. Maybe a small amount if at all?

    Thanks
    ~Chris
    I wounder the same thing, but GOL had a partial I/O test the the GPS turned off.
    Last edited by badbart; 10-06-2009 at 07:40 PM.

  3. #3
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SoCal - OC Style
    Posts
    2,479

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by GDXChris View Post
    I have noticed on some GOL results or similar that they have it marked 9500ix (GPS Off) and (GPS On). Does the GPS function even directly interfere with the signal? It doesn't seem like it would. Maybe a small amount if at all?

    Thanks
    ~Chris
    If you study the results, they definitely suggest that GPS "on" slows the response to I/O. 34.7 is particularly noticeable on the 9500ix ... 6 of 6 alerts with GPS off, 2 of 6 if I remember right with it on.

    There were similar results with all the GPS enabled detectors.

  4. #4
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Readstown, WI
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    Ya. It's very odd that it would. But I still had to ask. lol

    EDIT: Thanks for the info Obsidian!

  5. #5
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Posts
    122

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    Overall the 9500ix is still a great detector.

  6. #6
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Los Angeles Area
    Posts
    13,881

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    Yeah, in my opinion, this is horrible! It would be one thing if the 9500 took a little extra time to process the alert with GPS on, but for GPS to have an effect on whether or not a Ka alert ever happens or not, is totally unacceptable! More quirks in Escort software that we keep finding.

  7. #7
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Readstown, WI
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    Ya. Ive watched so many vids. I'm hyped regardless though. lol

    I do agree, however, that there is much room for improvement.

  8. #8
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SoCal - OC Style
    Posts
    2,479

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    The GPS button is a misnomer too ... the GPS is always on. It's only the TrueLock feature you actually turn on and off with the GPS button. Info per Escort's official rep.

    So TrueLock on = (even) slower response to I/O and dare I say Q/T. TrueLock off speeds things up, but it's still slow.

    For what it's worth, Escort also stated in their forum that the TSR feature slows response time as well.

    Speed is what we need.

  9. #9
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Readstown, WI
    Posts
    118

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    I agree. ^

  10. #10
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    MA,NH
    Posts
    791

    Default Re: Escort 9500i(x) GPS sensativity difference?

    Quote Originally Posted by Obsidian View Post
    The GPS button is a misnomer too ... the GPS is always on. It's only the TrueLock feature you actually turn on and off with the GPS button. Info per Escort's official rep.

    So TrueLock on = (even) slower response to I/O and dare I say Q/T. TrueLock off speeds things up, but it's still slow.

    For what it's worth, Escort also stated in their forum that the TSR feature slows response time as well.

    Speed is what we need.
    Disagree.

    I believe if you shut the GPS off you loose SmartMute (Speed Based Mute) and GPS Position Filtering.

    SmartMute probably cost MIPS too.

    It may also depend on how many locations it needs to search.

    If I recall with the PC tools you can take certain classes out lockouts out.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-06-2012, 06:08 PM
  2. difference between 9500i and 9500ix?
    By merc63 in forum Escort
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 07-19-2009, 11:35 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-23-2009, 01:59 PM
  4. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-28-2008, 09:30 AM
  5. Escort Revision Difference?
    By Nexeo in forum Escort
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-18-2007, 05:40 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •