Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11
    Experienced
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    Unfortunately I don't have a portable video camera. My cell phone is capable of taking seriously horrible quality video, but I believe it can only hold a few seconds worth. I'll have to look into getting or borrowing one, though.

  2. #12
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    With The Ladies
    Posts
    1,729

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    I was in the same boat as you were frustrated with my ix, just give it some time and you will start to understand it.

    I always wanted to be alerted miles away and some times it wouldn't work like that, but once you get a true save then you will start liking your ix.

    Keep in mind weather conditions, structures, and the LEO Radar if he is using K or Ka band C/O, I/O, Q/T, etc...

    It will take a couple of shots to get the ball in the hoop so just be patient.

    I also would recommend as counter measure device a CB, $100 investment will save you miles ahead than what an RD can do, just sharing some free advice with you.

  3. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    The 9500ix is a pretty simple unit. Though it can have great range there is noting carved in stone that a .3mi alert isn't good, I have had many my self.

    If the 9500ix alerts you before you see the LEO its doing its job, but allso keep in mind LEO's also use I/O speed traps so at times there may be no inital warning.

  4. #14
    Manufacturer
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    998

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    Unkind, how fast were you going, and was the 9500ix in "Auto" or "AutoNoX" mode? In either of the Auto modes the 9500ix uses speed adjusted sensitivity to reduce X and K band radar detection range the slower you travel. At about 50MPH it is at full detection range.

    In "Highway" mode the 9500ix is always at full sensitivity, maximum detection range.

  5. #15

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    Quote Originally Posted by EscortRadar View Post
    Unkind, how fast were you going, and was the 9500ix in "Auto" or "AutoNoX" mode? In either of the Auto modes the 9500ix uses speed adjusted sensitivity to reduce X and K band radar detection range the slower you travel. At about 50MPH it is at full detection range.

    In "Highway" mode the 9500ix is always at full sensitivity, maximum detection range.
    Good point! It's "my way", or the "highway"...mode that is. I never run Auto nothing!

  6. #16
    Experienced
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    For those encounters I was in Highway mode doing 40MPH.

    Today I got another save...or scare...however you want to call it. I was doing 75MPH in a 55 zone on US84 on my way home from work, the road is fairly level line of sight wise. Traffic was moderate and I had a couple of vehicles in front of me in the fast lane doing about 60MPH. All of a sudden I get a BLARING K band alert and a "Multiple Signals Detected" voice (I guess the signal was so strong it detected him as 2, or he was running front/rear). I slam the brakes and quickly slow to the PSL. About .3 - .4 mile away is a LEO in oncoming traffic who I assume was running moving I/O K band. I guess he hit the guy in front of me who was only doing +5PSL because he didn't flip a U turn and get me. In any case, I'm getting a feeling I'm about due to lose at this game.

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    Quote Originally Posted by Unkind View Post
    For those encounters I was in Highway mode doing 40MPH.

    Today I got another save...or scare...however you want to call it. I was doing 75MPH in a 55 zone on US84 on my way home from work, the road is fairly level line of sight wise. Traffic was moderate and I had a couple of vehicles in front of me in the fast lane doing about 60MPH. All of a sudden I get a BLARING K band alert and a "Multiple Signals Detected" voice (I guess the signal was so strong it detected him as 2, or he was running front/rear). I slam the brakes and quickly slow to the PSL. About .3 - .4 mile away is a LEO in oncoming traffic who I assume was running moving I/O K band. I guess he hit the guy in front of me who was only doing +5PSL because he didn't flip a U turn and get me. In any case, I'm getting a feeling I'm about due to lose at this game.
    If the LEO is moving his ability to acquire your speed is about 1/2 stationary. Give it some time, but drive cautiously till you get your first real save.

  8. #18
    Experienced
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    So about 1/2 mile max with moving radar?

  9. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    9,497

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    Quote Originally Posted by Unkind View Post
    So about 1/2 mile max with moving radar?
    yes.

  10. #20

    Default Re: First "Real World" 9500ix Test

    Everyone looses "this game" with I/O. No super detector would help that. It is what it is. Only if the LEO advertises with multiple close bursts will you know he is ahead. If they don't advertise, you could get owned easy.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-02-2009, 09:34 AM
  2. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 11:24 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •