Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Power User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    I've received my iQ from Radarbusters this afternoon (super speedy overnight shipping! 24 hours after order it's on my doorstep), and have had a chance to drive about 4 hours with it and play around with the UI a bit. I've still got a long road trip ahead to test this thing for real, but already I have some observations:

    General Usability:

    * The size. Umm, it's definitely big and bulky compared to either a radar detector or a GPS unit, but it's not all that bad on the windshield of my 2011 A4. The Smart Cup mount seems to do fine on my glass, knock on wood. No complaints here.

    * The screen visibility is definitely not as good as a regular radar detector, and possibly not even as good as a GPS unit. It definitely does not have an antiglare screen coating like on my Audi's built-in GPS unit so sunlight at the right angle can cause absurd amounts of glare. No, it's not a part of a $45,000 car, but at the same time I would've expected better from a $650 MSRP product. It also lacks the brightness of a LED dot matrix display and washes out under bright light.

    * The touchscreen UI is quite laggy -- at least a half second delay between tapping something and it taking effect. Toggling the maps mode on and off is even more laggy. My $150 Garmin Nuvi doesn't behave this way, nor does my car's Nvidia Tegra based navigation system. This makes trying to toggle settings on the unit while driving even more distracting than it already is, and I don't think I'll be attempting that anymore.

    * The audio volume and clarity seem perfectly acceptable to me -- above average.

    Navigation Capabilities:

    Unreviewed. Will do and report back. I will say though that the maps view is very primitive compared to your typical $200 or less standalone GPS unit. But that's just an eye candy thing, I won't dwell on it much other than for the fact that if you have a lot of POI categories activated, the red light camera icons are no longer all that prominent.

    Detection Capabilities / Interface:

    I'll hold off on sensitivity opinions because I don't feel like I've driven anywhere close to enough to comment on it. But general comments:

    (1) Classic Escort style ramp-up. No real surprise here -- don't expect the iQ to be any different from the 9500ix; the ramp-up is not linear, but is more "threat" oriented where rapid tone means slam on the brakes and non-rapid tone means it's trying to annoy you ;-) (half-kidding!)

    (2) The multi-threat + spec meter display is excellent! I really like this idea.

    (3) New alert tone choices are excellent. The classic tones are just like the 9500ix, and there's now a more conservative option that just gives you a double-chime upon detection of a signal, then another double-chime when the ramp-up pegs. This one is GREAT if you regularly drivers others around. The big screen and the strobing alert LED makes the ramp-up easy to see without annoying your passengers. Only complaint is that the X, K, and Ka alerts are the same tone in this mode -- they should IMO be different.

    (4) Speaking of the blinking LED, please make that a configurable option. One of the niceties of this form factor is that it doesn't look to the outside world like a radar detector, but the blinking LED ruins that. I had CHP following me on the 280 for 4 miles or so running CO 34.7, and it was getting on my nerves watching the LED strobing at different paces, which the cop could definitely see. Unlike a traditional RD, there's no chance of mounting this in any "concealed" position, so having an option to disable the flashing LED (or to just make it stay constantly on when an alert is in progress) would be great!

    (5) GPS-based location alerts are TERRIBLE, a major regression from the 9500ix. For red light camera, speed trap, etc alerts, the "detector" mode presented no UI for it, just a voice that said "approaching red light camera". The 9500ix had arrows on the display, and IIRC even flashed some text as to the nature of the alert. On the iQ, there's no arrows, and if you missed the voice, you'll be left scratching your head as to what the alert was about. Please, do something about this in a software update. The maps mode does show RLC's as a point of interest icon, but also, there's no interactive feedback when you're approaching a camera. While I was on the highway, I got some red light camera warnings for nearby streets, and having arrows would've been very useful in determining whether or not the threat was relevant.



    That's it for now -- I'll report back again after my road trip with more info. I hope this feedback will be seen by EscortRadar if he's still monitoring the forums. If not, please feel free to copy this feedback to that other forum (tm).

  2. #2
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    3,724

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    Thanks for the review. This product always seemed like it was trying to be a jack of all trades, but nobody seems to be impressed with it. Every review I have seen makes it seem as if it is a waste of $650. It's crazy to think that anybody could have purchased a brand new Bel STiR for less than $600 when they were being discontinued.

  3. #3
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,618

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    I agree with all the above. For me, at least, it's a "trip" detector. Not an everyday use detector. I actually prefer the iQ to my Garmin 255W. Detection seems about the same as the 9500 series, with the exception that it doesn't "see" as many falses as my 9500s do. But when I ran into real radar on a trip, it did fine. I think the voice alerts are just plain weird. They took the female voice of the 9500 series and digitized it is the only way I can explain it. It's truly weird sounding. Instead of "kkaayy band" <--pretend that's normal, it's more like "kbnd". Extremely fast pronunciation.

  4. #4
    Manufacturer
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    998

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    Thanks for sharing your impression of the Passport iQ jdong, I'll pass them along. I still stop by here when I can

    We will be releasing a software (firmware) update for the iQ very soon which should address some concerns with it. We will definitely continue to support and develop software for the Passport iQ.

    My personal experience with the iQ is that it does seem cumbersome at first because of the different form factor compared to a RD, but I am used to it now. It has been very handy at finding alternate routes when I'm stuck in traffic. I currently prefer it over our other detectors as I do not have an in-car nav device.

    Radar detection performance for me has been very similar to a 9500ix while laser detection has been the best I have ever had with any windshield mounted detector, and nearly 0 falses. Have other iQ users noticed this also?


    Escort Radar customer service is available from 8am-6pm Eastern Time Mon-Fri at 1-800-543-1608

  5. #5
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    1,618

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by EscortRadar View Post
    Thanks for sharing your impression of the Passport iQ jdong, I'll pass them along. I still stop by here when I can

    We will be releasing a software (firmware) update for the iQ very soon which should address some concerns with it. We will definitely continue to support and develop software for the Passport iQ.

    My personal experience with the iQ is that it does seem cumbersome at first because of the different form factor compared to a RD, but I am used to it now. It has been very handy at finding alternate routes when I'm stuck in traffic. I currently prefer it over our other detectors as I do not have an in-car nav device.

    Radar detection performance for me has been very similar to a 9500ix while laser detection has been the best I have ever had with any windshield mounted detector, and nearly 0 falses. Have other iQ users noticed this also?
    I have never had a laser false on mine, either. Haven't run into laser yet with it. I agree with you on the radar detection, seems identical to the 9500 series. My wife is trying to get me to sell my Garmin because of the iQ, she likes it that much.

  6. #6
    Power User
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    Quote Originally Posted by EscortRadar View Post
    Thanks for sharing your impression of the Passport iQ jdong, I'll pass them along. I still stop by here when I can

    We will be releasing a software (firmware) update for the iQ very soon which should address some concerns with it. We will definitely continue to support and develop software for the Passport iQ.
    Thanks for responding to this thread! It's always great to see a company taking interest in customer opinions on their products. I look forward to testing out this update, and hope it'll be ready before my road trip mid next week!

    My personal experience with the iQ is that it does seem cumbersome at first because of the different form factor compared to a RD, but I am used to it now. It has been very handy at finding alternate routes when I'm stuck in traffic. I currently prefer it over our other detectors as I do not have an in-car nav device.

    Radar detection performance for me has been very similar to a 9500ix while laser detection has been the best I have ever had with any windshield mounted detector, and nearly 0 falses. Have other iQ users noticed this also?

    Yep, definitely once you start putting both a windshield-mount detector and GPS unit in your car, things start looking really hairy, and the Passport iQ is a great combination of those two devices.

    I have no complaints about the detection performance so far. It does seem very similar to the 9500ix, and the only thing that I really can whine about on the 9500ix is the ramp-up, but we've already kicked that dead horse too many times. Laser falsing is definitely minimal. I haven't noticed any yet, despite seeing a lot of Infiniti's around here. I also have yet to have a real laser encounter...

    The user interface is the main part that I have issues with, for the reasons I've already outlined. It's definitely not as easy to use as a dedicated radar detector. "Cumbersome" as you put it. Hopefully I'll get used to it over time.

  7. #7
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,789

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    Well, this review is certainly more "gentle" than aa2033's.

  8. #8
    Mobile Installer
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    East Coast (USA)
    Posts
    4,203

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    I would use a IQ in my ride

  9. #9
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    N.E. PA
    Posts
    1,960

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    Where the h*** would you put it? lol

  10. #10
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    1

    Default Re: Passport iQ: Initial Thoughts

    Passport IQ is useless in sports cars and on motorcycles. Don't waste your money if either are your intended applications.
    The screen, after optimizing settings, is so washed out and of such low resolution that it is dangerous to use due to the intensity of concentration it takes to make out - or try to guess - what it reads. This includes overcast days, not just bright sunlight.
    I don't like whiners and unreasonable rants. I took time to use it in different conditions and on different routes, read the manual, etc. The Passport IQ really is of no use what-so-ever in an open sports car or motorcycle.
    The Passport IQ has other inadequacies that other's have noted.
    Finally, I took 36 days to give it a good test and try to make it work for me. Escort says 30 day return policy is written in stone. Nice.
    I suppose I should have acted on my first impression and returned it rather than give the Passport IQ and Escort a fair shot at being useful at least some of the time.
    If you want to use a GPS and RD in an open sports car or motorcycle then don't even think about the Passport IQ.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Initial Impressions
    By 9500ier in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-27-2009, 08:29 AM
  2. Initial 35.5 QT Testing
    By rsatmans in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 09-29-2009, 07:00 PM
  3. Initial impressions...
    By Doc What, son? in forum Other Countermeasures
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-30-2007, 11:15 AM
  4. New V1- Initial Experience
    By wadro in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 07-03-2007, 08:02 AM
  5. Initial rx 65 setup?
    By crabman in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-23-2005, 11:24 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •