Radar detector for high way driving only

[NormSky]

New V1 is matching or better the RL in constant-on. No contest for instant-on as the new V1 eules.

^Really? Have you tested it against the Redline?

...

Check out ghz1 videos as he is testing one now.

I've seen them. That's a 3.872. The new one is 3.891.

Bigalinwv has the latest and says it's better than the RL in constant-on K.

[Weeth]

New V1 is matching or better the RL in constant-on. No contest for instant-on as the new V1 eules.

^Really? Have you tested it against the Redline?

...

Check out ghz1 videos as he is testing one now.

I've seen them. That's a 3.872. The new one is 3.891.

Bigalinwv has the latest and says it's better than the RL in constant-on K.

Ha, you're so predictable. I knew that was coming next. I'm not gonna read through that whole thread again, but IIRC, it was tested against false K sources which is not the same as real world C/O.

I just wanted to point out your unsupported claim to the OP, so he won't expect the V1 to match/beat the redline on C/O in his terrain. (until further testing, which hasn't been done/posted)

If VR's C/S didn't suck, I'd get one and test it myself.

[NormSky]

New V1 is matching or better the RL in constant-on. No contest for instant-on as the new V1 eules.

^Really? Have you tested it against the Redline?

...

Check out ghz1 videos as he is testing one now.

I've seen them. That's a 3.872. The new one is 3.891.

Bigalinwv has the latest and says it's better than the RL in constant-on K.

Ha, you're so predictable. I knew that was coming next. I'm not gonna read through that whole thread again, but IIRC, it was tested against false K sources which is not the same as real world C/O.

I just wanted to point out your unsupported claim to the OP, so he won't expect the V1 to match/beat the redline on C/O in his terrain. (until further testing, which hasn't been done/posted)

If VR's C/S didn't suck, I'd get one and test it myself.

So you'll wait for the test and then order a V1? Obviously you are following the updates closely even though you don't own one.

[Weeth]

New V1 is matching or better the RL in constant-on. No contest for instant-on as the new V1 eules.

^Really? Have you tested it against the Redline?

...

Check out ghz1 videos as he is testing one now.

I've seen them. That's a 3.872. The new one is 3.891.

Bigalinwv has the latest and says it's better than the RL in constant-on K.

Ha, you're so predictable. I knew that was coming next. I'm not gonna read through that whole thread again, but IIRC, it was tested against false K sources which is not the same as real world C/O.

I just wanted to point out your unsupported claim to the OP, so he won't expect the V1 to match/beat the redline on C/O in his terrain. (until further testing, which hasn't been done/posted)

If VR's C/S didn't suck, I'd get one and test it myself.

So you'll wait for the test and then order a V1? Obviously you are following the updates closely even though you don't own one.

Haha, maybe! I've had 2 already lol. I gotta wait to see what the Bel Magnum has in store.

[Akosikojak]

Haha, maybe! I've had 2 already lol. I gotta wait to see what the Bel Magnum has in store.

I'm trying to remain positive about the new magnum, but Band Seg will make or brake this new magnum IMO. I am hoping for best prepping for the worst

[Akosikojak]

Haha, maybe! I've had 2 already lol. I gotta wait to see what the Bel Magnum has in store.

I'm trying to remain positive about the new magnum, but Band Seg will make or brake this new magnum IMO. I am hoping for best prepping for the worst

[insidercw3]

Haha, maybe! I've had 2 already lol. I gotta wait to see what the Bel Magnum has in store.

I'm trying to remain positive about the new magnum, but Band Seg will make or brake this new magnum IMO. I am hoping for best prepping for the worst

EscortRadar has already announced that the Magnum does not have Band Segmentation. To the original poster, the 9500ix is no slouch on the highway, whatever you do do not run 2 detectors at the same time, regardless of what the 'experts' on this forum claim.

[NormSky]

New V1 is matching or better the RL in constant-on. No contest for instant-on as the new V1 eules.

^Really? Have you tested it against the Redline?

...

Check out ghz1 videos as he is testing one now.

I've seen them. That's a 3.872. The new one is 3.891.

Bigalinwv has the latest and says it's better than the RL in constant-on K.

Ha, you're so predictable. I knew that was coming next. I'm not gonna read through that whole thread again, but IIRC, it was tested against false K sources which is not the same as real world C/O.

...

Ghz1 video has a V1 showing very good off axis 35.5 C/O, beating the Redline which is the king in that area and unheard of from the V1 3.872. Would buy a .872 and have it updated or brand new .892/3?

Regardless if you segment anything Belscort product you'll have to run a RL or V1 for the so many out of tune LEO radar guns that the segmented Belscort misses. Might as well hget a V1 and have the best and be done with it.

[mastersource]

Haha, maybe! I've had 2 already lol. I gotta wait to see what the Bel Magnum has in store.

I'm trying to remain positive about the new magnum, but Band Seg will make or brake this new magnum IMO. I am hoping for best prepping for the worst

EscortRadar has already announced that the Magnum does not have Band Segmentation. To the original poster, the 9500ix is no slouch on the highway, whatever you do do not run 2 detectors at the same time, regardless of what the 'experts' on this forum claim.

I may be out of the loop but what is the "Escort Magnum" ?

[Weeth]

It's actually a Beltronics. STI Magnum that was at the SML tests. Still no specifics yet.