If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
Thanks for what you were able to contribute, so far, mhardy.
As I've said on RR.net, I just want to get to the bottom of what version was used - definitely, there's not much concern with the XR, as we won't see that piece of hardware, here (thankfully!)....
It's just that I don't want to see any "shadows" following the LaserMask, so that either its detractors - or the opposite - can then take undue advantage of the data reported by the GOL.
Simple as that.
__________________ - Allen / Usual Suspect "DumboRAT" / One of the Three Stooges
ouch. this whole deal appears to be my fault. mhardy had sent me an email asking where we got the laser mask and I said buyradardetector which is john turner. so that's the reason they came back saying it was an unauthorized dealer... when in fact the laser mask was blind purchased. the other jammers came from BESTradardetectors...
so to remedy the problem, I will no longer answer any emails concerning GoL tests. I will stick to the forum that way I have built in error checking from other members.
my apologizes to mhardy for the headache. but rest assured the product was the latest and greatest laser mask had to offer.
Ok got a interesting question. On the base test GOL did the Custom ProLaser II and both Traffipatrol XR's got base locks at shorter lock distances but when the ci Jammer was used the distance those jammers got speed was improved. So the ci actually can improve the ability for a gun to get speed? Isn’t it suppose to do the opposite?
Ok got a interesting question. On the base test GOL did the Custom ProLaser II and both Traffipatrol XR's got base locks at shorter lock distances but when the ci Jammer was used the distance those jammers got speed was improved. So the ci actually can improve the ability for a gun to get speed? Isn’t it suppose to do the opposite?
I'd say it didn't jam the XR at all and the increased readings are just an anamoly more than anythig.
__________________
Mustang GT Convertible, 20" TSW Nogaros, Eibach Pro-Kit Springs 9500ci, Veil, V1 3.864 hardwired high with X and K off, 9500ix confiscated by the woman and hardwired high in her car . TruSpeed enabled Laser Interceptor Quad System.
I think that as a part of the "Worst Case Scenario," the hardpoint profile of the HHR caused some rather unpredictable results, particularly with jammers which were not "powerful enough" to offer sufficient coverage.
__________________ - Allen / Usual Suspect "DumboRAT" / One of the Three Stooges
Radar Roy's Detector and Jammer Buyer's Guide!
For pros or novices, this FREE 22 page consumer report is a must read for anyone considering any speed counter measure device. Radar Detector Buyer's Guide
Visit RadarBusters for all your Speed Countermeasure Equipment RadarBusters.com
Re: Some Thoughts About GOL 2008 LIDAR Test 
.
