Ivan said there is a bad and good version of the "stalker fix." What revision numbers are the good ones and which ones are the bad ones?
You know what's fishy about this entire board?
20 of us on this board are seeing quality control and software related problems with the Laser Interceptor compared to 1 person on this board who had a problem with the Laser Defender, yet the 1 person who had a problem with the LD has a "STICKY" and all the problems related to the LI are labled as "Fishy" and not stickied. What can be more fishy then people on this forum trying to make it seem alright we just paid $600.00 for a product that has a failure rate of 20%. I feel like everyone on this board except for the ones who have problems work for Elvis. Seriously.
I wish I would have read the small print with the GoL testing. I feel mislead about that test, being it was a completely different jammer all together(dual diode.) It's 100% my fault I was duped into buying a product that tested well in prototype stage. Concept cars are given rave reviews, but they rarely make it to production or they're severely watered down to cut costs when it finally hits the market. I feel the GoL was taken advantage of and in return a few skim readers lost some dough. I can only be thankful I can spare a few bills for my mistake. Others won't be so lucky unfortunately.
I have a feeling my LI will be sold on fleabay in exchange for an escort ZR4. I know Escort doesn't have supply chain problems. Let's hope the GoL tests a retail version of that, not a prototype.
The help desk idea brought up by Ivan is a good idea, however if I continue to see problems with no resolve in 1 month I'm going to be really upset.