Dual or Quad Laser Inteceptor

[vdub.:R]

Haven't been on here in ages, but I'm back with a question. As some may faintly remember I was going to by myself a LI for christmas last year. That never happened, so this time around Im committed to getting one. My question is should I get the dual or quad? Where I am from the police are not known for shooting to the rear. I have a 2008 VW r32.

[TSi+WRX]

If they shoot your backside, you'll want protection for that aspect of the vehicle - thus, a quad.

Two up front, two at the rear.

Expensive, but you need rear protection.

[snoopyc4]

LI Quad if you are concerened about rear laser. Two heads on the front and two on the rear.

[category4]

Just depends on whether you consider rear shots to be a valid threat.

I was never worried about it much until I started seeing LEO's sit on the overpasses. It's just as easy to shoot the rear of a vehicle going away as it is the front of a vehicle going toward you from an overpass.

[Batman]

Yes rear attacks from overpasses are the reason you need to protect against attacks from behind.

[stinger11]

Yes rear attacks from overpasses are the reason you need to protect against attacks from behind.

[insert immature joke here]

[DrCoke]

If your a true speeder, who gives a crap if they clock you from the rear. If they can chase you after getting a reading from the rear, you wasnt really speeding to begin with.

[languy99]

I would personally recommend a m47, it sounds like you don't have tons of cash (like most of us) and a m47 will cost just as much as a dual Li but you will have front and rear protection. And it should provide you with more then enough protection for the small car you have.

[rsatmans]

Yeah I would go LI quad. You could always buy a dual head now for the front and pick up the rear heads as the money comes.

[stinger11]

Yeah I would go LI quad. You could always buy a dual head now for the front and pick up the rear heads as the money comes.

so its just plug and play?