Page 1 of 5 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 50
  1. #1
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    97

    Default GOL APR 2006 Results...Am I reading 'em right?

    Looks like there were big time punchthroughs for every jammer BUT it seems that the jammer was at least able to hold of a speed reading for at least a few seconds. The Blinder really seemed to provide some solid jamming and able to hold off the guns for the longest amount of time. Am I reading that right? AL7 had some impressive numbers as well though with 2 Xpndrs.

    Also, any shots of the Blinder starting at 500ft to see how long it would hold off the lidar at shorter ranges?

    Good test but still trying to "analyze".

  2. #2
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    6,806

    Default

    Most of the high punchthroughs were when the LEO was situated 35' off the centerline of the road. So the angle was steep.

    The numbers look better when the LEO is more direct in line with traffic.
    If I'm passing you on the right, YOU are in the wrong lane!

    If speed kills, how come I'm still alive?

    Active Countermeasures: V1 3.858, Escort Redline, Beltronics STi-R+, LI Dual 7.1x CPU/8.7 Heads (front)
    Other/Backup Countermeasures: V1 3.813 (loaned to friend), Beltronics Pro RX65 M4 6.3
    Vehicle: 2002 Audi A4 1.8T Quattro
    LEO Toys: Kustom Pro Laser II & III
    Encounters/Saves August 2011: Radar 3/1, Laser 0/0


  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    1,041

    Default

    AL units seem to have trouble with PL3 at such angle. It sure can jam when it is straight-on or smaller angle. but 800ft punchthrough is unacceptable at 35ft angle.

  4. #4
    Founder of Stealthvation
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    11,174

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by go.mouse
    AL units seem to have trouble with PL3 at such angle. It sure can jam when it is straight-on or smaller angle. but 800ft punchthrough is unacceptable at 35ft angle.
    I agree.
    RIP Duncan my BELOVED black lab son 8/7/99-3/23/11. I will miss you DEARLY.


    http://www.criminalcustomzshop.com/


    LET THE BIRTH OF MANY TESTING GROUPS HAPPEN!











    You want to know what it is like doing something for the love and passion and not for the mighty dollar then look up GOL!










    buyradardetectors rocks!

  5. #5
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati
    Posts
    61

    Default

    Where is the link? I cannot find it on guysoflidar.com

    cleared my cache and it's there.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    2,854

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by go.mouse
    AL units seem to have trouble with PL3 at such angle. It sure can jam when it is straight-on or smaller angle. but 800ft punchthrough is unacceptable at 35ft angle.
    800 foot punch throughs is bloody ridiculous. Who wants to spend $700.00 to get punch throughs that high? Dumb.

    I started to get skeptical of anti-laser and Gol's and our test(mouse and I) prove my skepticism right.

    Anti-laser lied to us in that BMW video no doubt.

    JTW

  7. #7
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    1,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JTW
    Quote Originally Posted by go.mouse
    AL units seem to have trouble with PL3 at such angle. It sure can jam when it is straight-on or smaller angle. but 800ft punchthrough is unacceptable at 35ft angle.
    800 foot punch throughs is bloody ridiculous. Who wants to spend $700.00 to get punch throughs that high? Dumb.

    I started to get skeptical of anti-laser and Gol's and our test(mouse and I) prove my skepticism right.

    Anti-laser lied to us in that BMW video no doubt.

    JTW
    just hook it up to the usb port and upgrade it :roll: :roll: :roll: :?: :?: :?:

    and after all the bashing blinder took....there jammer did well, no need to sue blinder dudes . how much of a difference do you think there is between a m40 and a m45?

  8. #8
    Experienced
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    259

    Default

    Does this mean even though AL deceived us with their magical BMW video, still means AL is the top contender, but not best value to performance ratio. Blinder would take this category. Is that about right? Not bad numbers for such a worst case scenario, and no VEIL, and half the price of the AL.

  9. #9
    Advanced Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Southern MA
    Posts
    10,127

    Default

    After seeing the results of Anti-Laser and personally testing my lidateks with my gun I am a bit worried about Diode jammers. I will wait till the DS results before I swear off diode and go to the Escort Zr3, as long as I have lasershield and VEIL that jammer seems to be extremely realiable

    Spoiler: show

    Radar Detectors-V1 & BEL v995
    Laser Jammer-Laser Interceptor Quad
    GPS Camera Locator-Cheetah C100
    GPS Nav-Garmin nuvi w/Trapster
    CB Radio-Galaxy DX-949 w/Wilson 500
    Scanner-RS Pro-96

  10. #10
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    5,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JTW
    Quote Originally Posted by go.mouse
    AL units seem to have trouble with PL3 at such angle. It sure can jam when it is straight-on or smaller angle. but 800ft punchthrough is unacceptable at 35ft angle.
    800 foot punch throughs is bloody ridiculous. Who wants to spend $700.00 to get punch throughs that high? Dumb.

    I started to get skeptical of anti-laser and Gol's and our test(mouse and I) prove my skepticism right.

    Anti-laser lied to us in that BMW video no doubt.

    JTW
    .

    No, on that BMW vehicle they were at no angle, and they targeted the jammer until the end. I believe they have been honest. Anyone that has common sense knows that when you fire on a jammer dead on,. it will do better. I noticed this in their video. (no i have not gotten a free pro park)

    Guys they didnt lie to anybody. mislead however-- that could eb a possibility. But ask me this, would you take a pro park or a blinder?

    This bashing isnt about whats best anymore, its about having expectations that the DF2 will be jam to gun no matter what. The thought of punch through is un-exceptable. Guys, the thoguht of JTG under any circumstances is exciting, even to me, but coming to the realization of LED jammers is all you need, even with punch throughs can do the job... Come on ppl. Think about what you need.

    I still am impressed with anti-laser, heck I am still impressed with blinder. Lets stop bashing, and think about what protection current, and RETAILED units provide us.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. GOL October 2006 test results.....NEW!!
    By madmax31 in forum Escort
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-27-2006, 07:49 AM
  2. SML 2006 Results?
    By cyberblob in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 132
    Last Post: 08-19-2006, 04:13 PM
  3. GOL Spring Laser Jammer Test 2006 Results Posted!
    By jimbonzzz in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 76
    Last Post: 06-20-2006, 08:06 PM
  4. April 2006 Laser Countermeasure Results!
    By hookem202 in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-08-2006, 02:09 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •