EDIT -- Original post deleted because facts were in error.
JTW
EDIT -- Original post deleted because facts were in error.
JTW
JTW, the Maron uses laser but its not a LIDAR system, it cannot be jammed by any laser jammer.
PLease JTW, quit highjacking the laser jammer section, why plaguing the section with half a dosen seperate posts on the same thing?... first it was an obsesion against DriveSmart highjacking every thread were their unit was mentioned, which was a real pain for us looking for info on then new jammers, now DriveSmart is great and all of a sudden its a 180º turn on the opposite direction, sometimes I just wonder what happens in this forum behind the scenes...
I have been avoiding posting altogether but this is too much, its a real turn down for those that come in here for objective info on which is the best jammer for their needs and which to go for. Hopefully the GoL test will end most of this cold-war tactics that have been going on here.
Actually, they aren't all on the same thing Carlos. These are all different systems!Originally Posted by Carlos from Spain
Every laser jammer company must be scrutinized for the benefit of the consumer. I drilled Drive-Smart and now it's time for Anti-Laser to answer the question. All they have to do is answer the questions and everything will be fine. Just let us know when the update is available Anti-Laser and everyone should be happy.
JTW
For the record I never said I recommended Drive-Smart. Don't put words into my mouth carlos. Now sit back and enjoy these legitimate questions I asked anti-laser. If you don't like legitimate quesitons asked then it's obvious you have an agenda.
I have loyalty to knowbody. Blinder, Drive-smart, Anti-laser, whatever. All were asked questions and all said I had an agenda. You can't have an agenda if you ask all companies the difficult questions.
JTW
I'm not disagreeing with what you are saying JTW, its just the way its being done. It seems like a political rally, trying to persuade forum users opinion one way or the other.
You have asked a legit question: which guns does it jam. If you don't get an answer then let the readers decide what to make of it, you have done your job there. But don't highjack the section in a "campaign".
Its just that its really anoying to have every thread turn into a flaming war, and being highjacked into different paths than the intetion of the thread which do not lead to any menainful info for the forum members.
Same with DriveSmart previsously, the diffenrent poster idebntity issue was uncovered but no need to go into every DriveSamrt therad were the product itself is being discussed and highjack it into a flaming war. That does not lead to any useful information for us.
Once anti-laser answers the question the thread will die. If readers don't have an interest in anti-laser they can look at the title of the thread and skip it.
What else are we going to talk about in the laser jammer thread? We've talked about how anti-laser is curretly the best and now we have some informationm that deserves an answer to. This is important because many people in the UK have to face unipar guns.
For USA use the anti-laser is still the best. I'm concerned about our UK readers/users.
JTW
Yes, its still to be determined which is the best, buut not only US/UK.
In Spain for example we need a "legal" jammer so it needs to have parking sensor or garage opener type function. We also need rear protection so the rear transponder head needs to be small. We need protection agaisnt ovehead passes. And we need great performance against the LTIs at close range due to photo-lidar. In South africa and other places in Europe thay have the same requierements.
For example, yesterday I tested the Target LT400, its sold as a garage opener if you purchase the garage accessory. Only has front protection with no poosibility of a second head. Tried it agaisnt the Ultralyte 100LR and got punch through everytime on head light shots at photo-lidar distances (150-40m). Tried the LCR-100 (LE-20 in US) as well and even worse results.
Like I said, JTW, you are asking a very legit and useful question for all us looking for info, and I apreciate that. But please don't turn it into a campaign that will detract from the usefulnees of the original question and purpose of this forum.
Carlos, when JTW was attacking Drivesmart, it was really strong... he exposed everything.
Now that JTW is exposing Antilaser (laser park pro) i am enjoying waiting for the answers... or perhaps AL6.5 LLP will just ignore JTW and pretend nothing happens, and hope it will "go away"?
Anti-laser will have a tough time pretending my questions don't mean anything when videos start popping up of their jammer not having any effect on them. Soon all the European users of the Pro-Park will get pissed because they were sold a jammer with an incomplete lidar gun look up table with NO generic jamming sequence.Originally Posted by nvr2fast
This is really bad for the European users. Us USA buyers should be fine with the Anti-laser though, until a new gun comes out and who knows how long they'll take to update the software because they might not even acknowledge a new gun in the USA market. If Anti-laser stays quiet on all these guns I asked them about they'll probably stay quiet on the new USA guns too. That's fricken ridiculous.
JTW
Yes indeed, JTW is like the county sherrif on the forumOriginally Posted by nvr2fast
It will not go away, i assure you that! Not when JTW is on the case :twisted:
Bookmarks