Guys I think it would be cool if a company could make a jammer that is based of laser diode AND LED. I wonder why a company has not done this?
Guys I think it would be cool if a company could make a jammer that is based of laser diode AND LED. I wonder why a company has not done this?
RIP Duncan my BELOVED black lab son 8/7/99-3/23/11. I will miss you DEARLY.
http://www.criminalcustomzshop.com/
LET THE BIRTH OF MANY TESTING GROUPS HAPPEN!
You want to know what it is like doing something for the love and passion and not for the mighty dollar then look up GOL!
buyradardetectors rocks!
There you go you and the Professor can start one.
A Diode jammer surrounded by LEDs would be cool
Spoiler: show
If you already have a diode, what the point of having a less effective LED.
Dam just had to put my 2 cents in.
Don't know just for spite? 8)Originally Posted by amoney
Maybe a Diode jammer that can be mouted center mass than two LED jamming heads Mounted at each corner to make sure the Diode fires and provide asistance with their LED power
Spoiler: show
Would it be possible to set up a laser jammer to give the officer a PSL speed. Thus not having to worry about drawing suspicion JTG. :wink:
Not really possible, unless you want to display a faster speed then you are actually goingOriginally Posted by amoney
my thinking on it would be for more coverage.Originally Posted by amoney
since diodes seem to be stronger but with a more "narrow" field and led's are weaker, but with a more "floodlight" field, you would have coverage from ground and high overpass shots.
hopefully this can be tested at GOL.
Jim couldnt you have a Jammer that reported a consistant speed Example...Using a look up table once the gun is reconized the jammer reports like 400MPH you know something crazy like that... that seems possible..at least it does to me.
But it would DEF have to be a diode!!
To display a slower target speed, the distance mesaurements taken by the gun would need to decrease slower than actual readings from the target. This means that the gun would need to interpret the vehicle as being farther away then it actually is.Originally Posted by Ford_Focus_05
But in order for that to happen, the time of flight for the gun's pulses would have to be -longer- than the actual time of flight for the pulses from the gun to the target and back. But this is not possible, because once the gun receives it's own reflected pulse, any jamming pulse received after that is ignored until the next pulse is sent by the gun.
Jim
Bookmarks