^ So this was with the ZR3 ? Or was this the ZR4 ? Or was this the LI ?
Sorry, I'm just a bit confused....
---
Agreed.
You need to come out where I live...... Sub-500 ft. engagement distances, over-the-crest.If you can't see the cop shooting laser at a mere 500 feet from you then you deserve the speeding ticket.![]()
True, but as PMoth is fond of saying, what happens in a real-world scenario, where the enforcer may not have the most steady hands, or accidentally panned across to the tail-lights?Also remember that a single head rear jammer is only going to basically protect against rear license plate shots which is were cops normally aim at. The rear taillights are just too far away from the rear jammer for it to be effective against rear taillights.
That's a "what-if" scenario that I do not think that anyone should have to bear.
My view of rear-jamming is very, very pragmatic - some would say pessimistic....
I say to either go all-out, and make sure that it's a full "JFG" no matter where you're hit, or just not worry about it at all.
To me, anything else only confers a sense of false-security.
This is currently highly physical-location based.Besides, rear laser shots are very rare compared to front laser shots.
Here in Metro NE-Ohio, rear-on LIDAR shots are becoming more and more common.
My accelerated pace in seeking comprehensive rear coverage actually was prompted by a warning voiced on my local Subaru enthusiast Forum, where a fellow member passed by (without speeding) a rear-scenario trap, a local on-ramp.
Depending on where you live, rear-enforcement can either be more rare than aChinese girl with one green eye, or more common than toast.![]()






Reply With Quote

Bookmarks