Radar Detector Jammer Forum


If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.



Notices

Reply
Old 09-05-2008   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
StlouisX50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: O'FALLON, MISSOURI
Posts: 6,882
StlouisX50 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via Yahoo to StlouisX50
Post AZ - Lawsuit could void photo-radar tickets

Lawsuit could void photo-radar tickets

By Howard Fischer
Capitol Media Services
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 09.05.2008
advertisement

PHOENIX — Thousands of Arizona motorists who got photo-radar tickets might be able to ignore them if a new lawsuit is successful.
And those who already paid may be able to get their money back.
Legal papers filed in Maricopa County Superior Court contend the citations issued by Redflex Traffic Systems before at least the first week in August are illegal. That is because the company, which operates speed enforcement cameras for the Department of Public Safety and several Arizona communities, was operating radar guns that had not been cleared for use in this country.
Attorney Thomas Moring said that, at the very least, it entitles his client, James Tavernetti, to refuse to pay the photo-radar ticket issued by the town of Paradise Valley in June. A mobile photo-radar unit operated for the town by Redflex clocked him as speeding. But Moring also is asking Judge Eddward Ballinger to block any other state or local government that has issued such citations from enforcing them. That includes Paradise Valley and the Department of Public Safety and could affect Chandler, Prescott Valley, Tempe and Pinal County.
And Moring said the case could ultimately be expanded to cover those who paid the tickets without protest because they didn't know Redflex was operating the radar guns without legal authority.
Central to the dispute is the admission last month by Karen Finley, president of the Scottsdale-based company, that the particular type of radar units Redflex imported into the United States had not been approved by the Federal Communications Commission. That approval is required of any device that transmits radio waves.
DPS, on hearing the admission, took its two photo-radar vans off the road until FCC certification came through. But Lt. James Warriner acknowledged the two vans already had issued about 4,800 citations since first being deployed last November.
Moring said the same type of unit was being used by Paradise Valley — also illegally.
Moring charges Redflex with negligence, saying the company knew or should have known that it was operating the radar units illegally.
Jay Heiler, a spokesman for Redflex, said he expects the lawsuit to be thrown out.
"The radars in question have always been approved and they've always been accurate," he said.
__________________
Valentine 1 & The Escort 8500 X50 - Blue, Uniden BC296D, GRE500, Lasershield, 2001 Ford Ranger, Yamaha FZ6, 2005 Black Dodge Neon SRT-4 - A laser beam would be as wide as my car at 1872' - Car being 67.4" wide.

Pulled over April 17th 2008 - For crossing over the center line, written warning issued.

Waved to slow down May 1st 2008 by a motor jock.
StlouisX50 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Radar Detector Jammer Forum » General » News Stories

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:55 AM. Copyright 2004 - 2008 Reyer and Associates and Netshops Inc.