Radar Detector Jammer Forum


If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.



Notices

Closed Thread
Old 02-25-2009, 11:50 AM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
StlouisX50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: O'FALLON, MISSOURI
Posts: 9,601   (View Stats)
StlouisX50 is on a distinguished road
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default Redflex Missteps Hit the Bottom Line Redflex photo enforcement profit up, but less th

Redflex Missteps Hit the Bottom Line
Redflex photo enforcement profit up, but less than it should have been, because of legal blunders.

While most companies are struggling to hold losses to a minimum in the current economic environment, the leading Australian provider of red light cameras and speed cameras yesterday reported explosive growth in its US operations. Redflex Traffic Systems collected 49.3 percent more in revenue from American motorists than it had pocketed six months ago. This strong performance, however, was offset by a series of blunders that converted what should have been a 26 percent increase in net profits after tax into a net decrease of 11 percent. A nationwide traffic decline has cut into the number of expected tickets and, the company noted, more of those who receive tickets are simply refusing to pay -- costing the company A$1.1 million in revenue.

"We are starting to see a significant reduction in collection rates on many of our programs where we are remunerated on a per-ticket basis," the Redflex half-yearly report to Australian investors stated. "We believe the economic downturn in the USA is a major contributing factor to this."

Other losses can be attributed to avoidable missteps. Lawsuits filed by Arizona-based American Traffic Solutions (ATS) over its Australian rival's illegal use of uncertified radar equipment cost A$616,000 in legal fees, fines and compliance costs. The company lost another A$1.1 million after it failed to mail a contract renewal application on time to the city of Knoxville, Tennessee and after El Monte, California dumped Redflex cameras because they created a documented increase in collisions.

Redflex spent A$155,000 in an unsuccessful effort to promote itself to larger companies that had expressed interest in buying the photo ticketing operation. Redflex spent another A$365,000 in moving its US offices to a luxurious new complex at the Pinnacle Peak Commerce Center in Phoenix, Arizona.

On the positive side, Redflex cited a number of developments favorable to its bottom line. An 88 percent boost in the number of cities signing up for speed cameras over the past half-year helped revenue growth. Each speed camera ticket paid in US dollars was converted into ten percent more Australian dollars thanks to the strengthening of the US dollar over the past six months.

Redflex also cited promising new technologies that would keep cities interested deploying the company's cameras. For example, new license plate recognition features can now be used in "identifying vehicles of interest" by tracking and identifying every vehicle that passes a Redflex camera, regardless of whether any traffic infraction has been committed or not. Redflex will also offer tickets using black and white photography to save money. It will offer "Remote adjudication processing" to allow idle operators sitting in the fully automated speed camera vans to process citations. The Australian company is also extending its offerings with Noise Ticket Cameras and cameras to automatically ticket any vehicle deemed too heavy.

"We expect to see the growth in the USA market continue," the Redflex report stated. "As the clear leader in that potential multi-billion dollar market which is less than 10 percent penetrated at this stage, the opportunities for growth are enormous, and Redflex is well positioned and equipped to capitalize on the continued expansion of the market."

Overall, the market was not impressed by the Redflex announcement. Shares plunged 25 cents from $3.05 to $2.80 upon its release.
__________________
Laser Interceptor Dual, Valentine 1 & The Escort 8500 X50 - Blue, Uniden BC296D, GRE500, Lasershield, 2001 Ford Ranger, Yamaha FZ6, 2005 Black Dodge Neon SRT-4 - A laser beam would be as wide as my car at 1872' - Car being 67.4" wide.

Jason Reynolds | Create your badge


Pulled over April 17th 2008 - For crossing over the center line, written warning issued.

Waved to slow down May 1st 2008 by a motor jock. *NEW* Pulled over May 10th 2009 For going 10 MPH over - Written Warning Issued.*

StlouisX50 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Closed Thread

Go Back   Radar Detector Jammer Forum » Other » News Stories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
1-21-08 -Redflex executes two photo enforcement contracts StlouisX50 News Stories 1 01-21-2008 10:33 PM
Redflex executes five photo enforcement contracts 10/9/07 StlouisX50 News Stories 1 10-09-2007 12:14 PM
Redflex executes 8 photo enforcement contracts StlouisX50 News Stories 0 09-06-2007 03:23 PM
Redflex executes 6 photo enforcement contracts StlouisX50 News Stories 0 08-29-2007 11:52 AM
Redflex executes 3 new photo enforcement contracts StlouisX50 News Stories 0 06-19-2007 06:02 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:48 PM. Copyright 2004 - 2009 Reyer and Associates and Netshops Inc.