Radar Detector Jammer Forum


If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.



Notices

Closed Thread
Old 07-02-2009, 11:39 AM   #1 (permalink)
Moderator
 
StlouisX50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: O'FALLON, MISSOURI
Posts: 9,619   (View Stats)
StlouisX50 is on a distinguished road
Not Ranked  0 score     
Post CA - California Tightens State Speed Trap Regulations

California Tightens State Speed Trap Regulations
California speed limits may no longer be lowered without a solid engineering justification under new rules.

As of today, it will be more difficult for California cities to lower speed limits to create lucrative radar speed traps. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has issued a new policy directive that alters the method used to set speed limits, as codified in the state's Manual on Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). California's speed trap law prohibits the use of radar or laser to issue speeding tickets on any road not in compliance with these new rules.

"The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence," the MUTCD explains. "Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public."

The rules require a regular engineering and traffic survey be used to determine the speed limit. The results of the survey will be rounded to the nearest 5 MPH increment of the speed most drivers in free-flowing traffic are comfortable driving -- the 85th percentile speed. The revised regulation eliminates a provision that allowed the "needs of the community" to be cited as a reason to arbitrarily reduce the speed limit by 5 MPH from the calculated value.

Under the new policy, the 5 MPH reduction can only be made if a registered civil or traffic engineer personally signs off on a study that documents how the reduction was required to address factors that are not "readily apparent" to drivers. For example, if the 85th percentile speed is measured to be 37 MPH, the speed limit must be set at 35 MPH unless a study shows a specific, objective factors indicating a need to reduce it to 30 MPH.

Chad Dornsife, Executive Director of the Best Highway Safety Practices Institute says the net result of this change is that it will be more difficult for jurisdiction to make that 5 MPH reduction. He argues further that the 85th percentile speed is by definition always the safest speed because it is based on the consensus of those who know the road best.

"'Conditions not readily apparent' when applied to a local surface street or residential collector is an oxymoron," Dornsife said. "By definition the primary users of this classification of roadway are the people who live or work there, and they use these very same roadways many times a day, going and coming. Therefore, the conditions are not only apparent to the primary users, they are well known. Whereas under current practice, the traffic engineer's opinion is based of a few hours of observation at best."

Caltrans made the change to standardize procedures across the state after a lengthy consultation process with law enforcement and local agencies. Many jurisdictions that began arbitrarily lowering speed limits by 5 MPH in 2004 had their citations thrown out in court. The new regulations are intended to create tickets that will withstand court scrutiny. Cities with red light cameras that raise speed limits to comply with the law will also need to increase the yellow time at affected intersections.

A copy of the new regulation is attached in a 600k PDF file at the source link below.

Source: Policy Directive TR-0011 (California Department of Transportation, 7/1/2009)



Permanent Link for this item
Return to Front Page
__________________
Laser Interceptor Dual, Valentine 1 & The Escort 8500 X50 - Blue, Uniden BC296D, GRE500, Lasershield, 2001 Ford Ranger, Yamaha FZ6, 2005 Black Dodge Neon SRT-4 - A laser beam would be as wide as my car at 1872' - Car being 67.4" wide.

Jason Reynolds | Create your badge


Pulled over April 17th 2008 - For crossing over the center line, written warning issued.

Waved to slow down May 1st 2008 by a motor jock. *NEW* Pulled over May 10th 2009 For going 10 MPH over - Written Warning Issued.*

StlouisX50 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Old 07-03-2009, 12:36 AM   #2 (permalink)
Street Lawyer
 
Lucky225's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Troubletown, Texas
Posts: 5,952   (View Stats)
Lucky225 is on a distinguished road
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default Re: CA - California Tightens State Speed Trap Regulations

AWESOME!!!!!!

Man this year was a good year in the legislative houses of California and Texas, we went from having a law that threatens tint in Texas to giving you MORE tint allowance. And from a law that threatens speedtrap regulations to a law tightening up!!!
__________________



Any statements, opinions, written material, forms or similar written or distributed communications contained in my posts are purely available for informational and educational purposes and is not a substitute for the advice of an attorney and is available in compliance with Texas Gov Code 81.101(c)

Spoiler: show
'04 Bonneville SE BLACK.
Blinder M25 Jammer 2-head(J16) system up front.
Bel STi-R Remote, X OFF, SWS ON, POP ON, RDR OFF, KA 2/3 - 33.8, 5/6 34.7 and 8/9 35.5 ON, all other KA segments off.
Roadmaster VR-3 VRVD640G In-dash DVD/GPS system with Speed/Redlight Camera alerts
Radioshack Pro-97 Triple-Trunk analog scanner
Cobra 19 ULTRA III CB Radio w/ Little Wil Antenna

Previous countermeasures:

2008-2009 Whistler XTR-695

2006-2008 Passport SRX 2 front, 1 back plate (Fried, sent to KustomEagle)

October 2002-2006 RadioShack Talking 360 Degree Laser/Radar Detector w/VG-2 Guard Cat #22-1682 non-FCC certified

Lucky225 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Old 07-03-2009, 10:03 PM   #3 (permalink)
Newcomer
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NorCal - Bay Area
Posts: 24   (View Stats)
DrTahoe is on a distinguished road
Not Ranked  0 score     
Default Re: CA - California Tightens State Speed Trap Regulations

Wow!! As a CA resident, I can not rememrber the last time in at least 4 yrs something has been enacted to help the residents...

Oh yeah.. it was Schwatrz.. revering teh 3X increase in vehicle license fee as his intro to office... that savings has been clawd back many times over....

How about letting us have jammers here...
__________________
9500ix
DrTahoe is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Closed Thread

Go Back   Radar Detector Jammer Forum » Other » News Stories

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
california speed trap kawasaki2008 Introduce Yourself 21 07-29-2009 01:58 AM
Some State Specific Law Enforcement Police Radar Regulations icantdrive55 News Stories 0 11-14-2007 05:24 AM
AR - State police say Elkins not a speed trap StlouisX50 News Stories 0 08-26-2006 12:12 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:26 AM. Copyright 2004 - 2009 Reyer and Associates and Netshops Inc.