Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Citizen Petitions Put Photo Enforcement Companies on the DefensivePetitions placing the fate of red light cameras and speed cameras in the hands of voters are circulating across the country. In November, photo enforcement bans are likely to be considered in three Ohio cites and two Texas cities. Every Arizona jurisdiction may have a chance to vote in November 2010.
So far, the efforts in Ohio are the most advanced. In April, the group succeeded in having an automated ticketing ban certified for the ballot in Chillicothe. This will be followed by a vote in the city of Heath where the group Citizens Against Photo Enforcement has already secured more than the required number of signatures. The group will continue to collect additional signatures before making a formal submission to election officials. A We Demand a Vote has secured half of the required number of signatures.
"The Coalition Against Spending and Taxes (COAST) and Americans for Prosperity are firmly committed to seeing it is done," COAST spokesman Chris Finney told TheNewspaper. "We had a decent rally in Toledo on the 8th, after collecting 1200 signatures in less than ten days."
Finney is confident the issue will be placed on the ballot and, once before the voters, red light cameras will be banned. Finney's prediction is based on his experience helping to lead a coalition that ousted red light cameras from third petition in Toledo last year. In 2006, seventy-six percent of Cincinnati voters rejected photo radar.
Efforts to ban cameras in Texas cities are also proceeding. Tomorrow, a petition to ban red light cameras in College Station will be handed to election officials. Local activist Jim Ash spearheaded the effort.
"The cities say it is a safety program," Ash wrote on Steubenville, Ohio. "I have evidence that one city council member even expected to see rear end accidents increase and still went ahead with the program. I, along with many others, have concluded the red light camera program is more about the money than anything else."
Former city councilman Paul Ford also continues his effort to line up signatures to his website. Although the issue has never been placed directly on a Texas ballot, 64 percent of ban red light cameras in Duncanville voters rejected a 2003 attempt to install "traffic management cameras" that opponents at the time said could be converted into ticketing cameras.
The most ambitious of all referendum efforts, however, is underway in Arizona. The group Arlington needs 153,364 verified signatures to give voters a say in whether automated ticketing machines should be allowed in the state. Camerafraud volunteer Shawn Dow told TheNewspaper that the petition has met with nearly universal support from the public.
"Photo radar is all people are talking about here," Dow said. "The cameras are coming down."
As a result, traffic cameras companies like Redflex Traffic Systems of Melbourne, Australia have begun taking steps to improve their local image. Redflex has begun sponsoring traffic reports on local radio stations like KTAR. Its Arizona-based competitor, American Traffic Solutions, recently gave sixty-five backpacks to school children.
History shows the companies will face an uphill battle at the ballot box. By a two-to-one margin, voters in Camerafraud.com ordered speed cameras to come down in the mid-Nineties. Voters in Batavia, Illinois and Peoria, Arizona also rejected photo radar. In 2009, eighty-six percent of Anchorage, Alaska rejected speed cameras. Photo enforcement has never survived a public vote.