Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1

    Default Can Someone Test this out???

    I was reading on
    that Turning on your high beam Head lights can effectively lower the effective range of lidar.... It says they used a contour, and it usually got pts at 1900 but with high beams on couldn't get a reading until 1100 feet... it says it high beams spew their own infrared beams... Can anyone test out and see if high beams makes it harder for lidar to get a reading??? Possible cool find if so...

  2. #2
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North Central Indiana
    Posts
    589

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    Wouldn't matter if this were true....driving with your highbeams is ill advised, flashing a cop with your high beams is more ill advised, and turning them on once you receive a laser alert is too late.


    rc

  3. #3
    Administrator
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Morristown, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    3,300

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    This use to be true in the early days of Lidar but no more. Having your headlamps on will make no difference



    Quote Originally Posted by ILikeRadarIMO View Post
    I was reading on
    that Turning on your high beam Head lights can effectively lower the effective range of lidar.... It says they used a contour, and it usually got pts at 1900 but with high beams on couldn't get a reading until 1100 feet... it says it high beams spew their own infrared beams... Can anyone test out and see if high beams makes it harder for lidar to get a reading??? Possible cool find if so...
    RadarBusters.com
    Motorcycle Mounts and Accessories
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: Roy Reyer

  4. #4
    Rocket Driver
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    8,717

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    Yes it does work, but only if you are using the HID type lights. It work with the low beams as well as the high beams.

    During our last Atlanta Area Jammer Test we proved this does work and when combined with a jammer it cut my headlight PT's to nothing.

    It works so well in fact that I now run with my headlights on all the time.

    I don't know how well it would work without jammers, but when I shoot the Laser Atlanta at night and target headlights of cars with HID lights it throws JA-3 codes and takes quite a while to get PT (3-4 seconds) on cars I am sure do not have jammers.
    Valentine One (3.858 Ice Cream Truck, 3.812 in Vette)
    4 Head LI (On Vette) (7.11 CPU Regular heads front, HP Heads on the rear)
    9500ci (On Vette)

    LI Quad (On Ice Cream Truck)

    LI Dual (On SRX, 7.06 CPU)

    ProLaser II, ProLaser III, Stalker LZ-1, LTI Marksman & Laser Atlanta "R" (looking for an Ultralyte LRB)

    2008 Corvette Z-51 Coupe

    Escort 9500 ix (Cadillac SRX)

  5. #5
    Rocket Driver
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    GA
    Posts
    8,717

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    Quote Originally Posted by radarroy View Post
    This use to be true in the early days of Lidar but no more. Having your headlamps on will make no difference



    Quote Originally Posted by ILikeRadarIMO View Post
    I was reading on
    that Turning on your high beam Head lights can effectively lower the effective range of lidar.... It says they used a contour, and it usually got pts at 1900 but with high beams on couldn't get a reading until 1100 feet... it says it high beams spew their own infrared beams... Can anyone test out and see if high beams makes it harder for lidar to get a reading??? Possible cool find if so...
    Roy I beg to differ, as I said regular headlight no help, HID headlights, big help.
    Valentine One (3.858 Ice Cream Truck, 3.812 in Vette)
    4 Head LI (On Vette) (7.11 CPU Regular heads front, HP Heads on the rear)
    9500ci (On Vette)

    LI Quad (On Ice Cream Truck)

    LI Dual (On SRX, 7.06 CPU)

    ProLaser II, ProLaser III, Stalker LZ-1, LTI Marksman & Laser Atlanta "R" (looking for an Ultralyte LRB)

    2008 Corvette Z-51 Coupe

    Escort 9500 ix (Cadillac SRX)

  6. #6
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Cleveland/Shaker Heights, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    7,732

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    Can anyone test this, with HIR (Halogen Infra-Red) bulbs? 9011/9012 (HIR-1/HIR-2, respectively).

    Also, incandescent-halogen lighting can still present a problem - cyberblob and serg demonstrated this not too long ago, with a late-model Honda Accord's incandescent-halogen DRLs, causing the Laser Atlanta to throw spurious JA-3 "potential jam" codes, with no viable speed reading.

  7. #7
    Power User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    My Home
    Posts
    3,169

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    Quote Originally Posted by category4 View Post
    Roy I beg to differ, as I said regular headlight no help, HID headlights, big help.
    Cat4, if you guys have some time, I would love to see a test done with cars that has small rounded high beam headlights - NOT H4 TYPE HEADLIGHTS. My preliminary test shows that is decreases range acquisition. My theory is that, small rounded headlight design for high beams are more focused light like a spot light compared to their bigger headlight design.

  8. #8
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Orlando, FL
    Posts
    8,881

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    We tested on my car with an LA, and we didn't notice any difference. The ZR4 still got PT on the passenger HL at around the same 500-600 ft mark with or without my HID lows (also did HID lows and fogs runs). Granted, mine aren't OEM HIDs, nor are they a projector style housing (which I'm assuming yours are?), so that might make a difference.

    We could try testing in the daytime, to see if that makes a difference, and also, could try shooting a car (not an SUV like mine) with OEM HIDs, to see if that might make a difference.

    Oh yea, forgot to add, I have separate high beams (9006 lows, 9005 highs) with the smaller, round reflector. We could test that as well to see if that makes a difference...
    Last edited by ELVATO; 04-14-2009 at 09:12 AM.

  9. #9

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    My theory is that Hid lamps use an energy pulsation to ignate
    the gaz , contrary to tungsten filamant @ constant 12 volts .

    What is bugging is the fact that some say the Hid have an effect ,
    some don't find any difference in laser acquisition .

    Who said '' find me the right frequency and I will jam anything ? ''

    Will someone invent the '' jammerinthebulb'' concept ?

  10. #10
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    2,827

    Default Re: Can Someone Test this out???

    I am tempted to use my stock HIDs during the day now, but I feel that combining that with travelling faster than the rest of traffic will just draw even greater attention to me from beyond where I can see the cop.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Test volunteers wanted for Miami Laser jammer test
    By venom400 in forum Laser Jammers - General
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 09-27-2009, 08:23 AM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-22-2009, 09:51 AM
  3. gol 2007 test no over the hill test
    By gadgetdude in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-19-2008, 01:07 PM
  4. Results from Aug. 17th RD Test Inconsistent with the Results from the Off-Axis Test?
    By ZJamaican in forum Detector & Counter Measure Testing and Reviews
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-16-2008, 10:30 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •