2010 Mustang Gt

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Ingus

The new camaros are for looks and are all puff. The new Mustangs have the muscle, maybe even too much (did I just say that?) ;) BTW I love the back end of the new Mustangs and I'm really glad that they brought back sequential turn signals with it. I'm going to drive one this week but most likely I'll instead be getting a 2010 Taurus SHO with the Ecoboost engine in a few months. That car is going to scream! Ford has done a LOT of engine tweaking the last few years and it is paying off for them big time. I drove a 2010 MKZ last week and that car was fast, so I'm sure the 2010 Mustang is going to be wicked sick fast :D

---

These numbers are just off the top of my head, but I think the new Camaro V8 is 426 HP, the new Camaro V6 is 305 HP, but the new Mustang V8 is only 315 HP. I think the new Mustang has the exact same engine as mine, but Ford just added a cold-air intake.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThE_JOkeR

The 2010 gt is nicer under the hood but in apperance, man wtf did they do to the rear end? damn ugly stick got to it! It looks weak!! Especially on a red convertible its 100% just girly..... and then you have the monster GT IronMan HEART MagNENT jutting out of it, I'm waiting for some ricer to mod it out with blue LEDs to Represent that!!!

From the front though I like it. It looks like the ol fastbacks, even more retro then the previous model crossed with modern sharpness. Real cool but those tail lights... omg.... Id probably figure out a way to hide them, Black stang with Smoked out lights? hmm

Anyways ive rambled on enough :p

---

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC02494.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC02497.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC02496.jpg

or this ugly thing

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC_0739.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC_0732.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC_0731.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fastgt2003

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThE_JOkeR

The 2010 gt is nicer under the hood but in apperance, man wtf did they do to the rear end? damn ugly stick got to it! It looks weak!! Especially on a red convertible its 100% just girly..... and then you have the monster GT IronMan HEART MagNENT jutting out of it, I'm waiting for some ricer to mod it out with blue LEDs to Represent that!!!

From the front though I like it. It looks like the ol fastbacks, even more retro then the previous model crossed with modern sharpness. Real cool but those tail lights... omg.... Id probably figure out a way to hide them, Black stang with Smoked out lights? hmm

Anyways ive rambled on enough :p

---

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC02494.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC02497.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC02496.jpg

or this ugly thing

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC_0739.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC_0732.jpg

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g2...g/DSC_0731.jpg

---

did you buy it?! looks like so..congrats..butttt i still think the newer camaro looks and performs better..but who knows if they will be ever a popular car. i heard G.M is within two months close to bankruptcy.

Must you quote all those pics? :p

I absolutely hate American cars, but there is no doubt that the Mustang > Craparo.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by FoolishOne

Must you quote all those pics? :p

I absolutely hate American cars, but there is no doubt that the Mustang > Craparo.

---

haha..ya i didnt really want to, but i dont think it hurt.;)

All puff? What are you talking about? The V6 maro is will rape the equivalent stang. 100 Horsepower more ALL while GETTING 29MPG on the Highway! because lets face it more V6s are sold then V8s due to cost.
The SS is pretty awesome too. 13.0 sec @ 111.0 mph @ 111mph!!!!! Puts slicks on and you're well into the 12s! Thats sick! The stang gt does it at 13.5 sec @ 104.2 mph. Not shabby. Definitely moves!

By the way Just my opinion but I think both cars have ugly rear ends. The Camaro doesn't look girly though & If you replace that silver trim around the lights itd look much better.

I think a Black mustang might look good in the rear. Blacked out rear.

You red looks pretty decent, its good since its not a convertible in red.

The Camaro looks alot more mean and has more muscle car toughness but I think the stang does look better from the front angle as you would see it coming down the road. Its real sleek but from straight on the camaro looks better, it just says Im going to Eat you :lol:
It just depends what look you want. Rough n Tough, or Pretty In Pink!!


(lol kidding..... or Slick speed)

.......btw I love how you pick A bright vibrant red color for the mustang and Bland silver for the camaro. the human brain reacts much much more to the vibrant red.

and im not defending the camaro or hating on the mustang. I'm just stating my personal opinion. Which is worth its weight in gold :D

and Just to be FAIR!.......................
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-uTjaQ6E7g"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-uTjaQ6E7g[/ame]
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3065/...f72aa21b_b.jpg

Poor mustang didn't get a 6th gear.

I prefer the Challenger though hands down.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ThE_JOkeR

All puff? What are you talking about? The V6 maro is will rape the equivalent stang. 100 Horsepower more ALL while GETTING 29MPG on the Highway! because lets face it more V6s are sold then V8s due to cost.
The SS is pretty awesome too. 13.0 sec @ 111.0 mph @ 111mph!!!!! Puts slicks on and you're well into the 12s! Thats sick! The stang gt does it at 13.5 sec @ 104.2 mph. Not shabby. Definitely moves!

.......btw I love how you pick A bright vibrant red color for the mustang and Bland silver for the camaro. the human brain reacts much much more to the vibrant red.

and im not defending the camaro or hating on the mustang. I'm just stating my personal opinion. Which is worth its weight in gold :D

---

if you couldn't tell those are pics I took I didn't other colors of the camaro

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fastgt2003

if you couldn't tell those are pics I took I didn't other colors of the camaro

---

I know. I did say "Your red looks pretty decent, its good since its not a convertible in red." :lol in my previous post. anyways....

Congrats, have fun :thumb2:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colonel Ingus

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Fastgt2003

dude i seen the new camaros at the auto show also here I don't like it at all

---

The new camaros are for looks and are all puff. The new Mustangs have the muscle, maybe even too much (did I just say that?) ;) BTW I love the back end of the new Mustangs and I'm really glad that they brought back sequential turn signals with it. I'm going to drive one this week but most likely I'll instead be getting a 2010 Taurus SHO with the Ecoboost engine in a few months. That car is going to scream! Ford has done a LOT of engine tweaking the last few years and it is paying off for them big time. I drove a 2010 MKZ last week and that car was fast, so I'm sure the 2010 Mustang is going to be wicked sick fast :D

---

Let me give you sneak peak into Ford Engineering:

Ford: Okay, we're really ****ing lazy, but we've gotta say we did something to give more horsepower, anyone got any ideas?
Ford Engineer: Ohh, I have a great idea. How about we put a CAI onto the same ****ty V8 engine that a V6 can out perform, and rate it at another 15 hp or so!
Ford: GREAT! This is why we hired you smart people? Any more ideas?
Ford Research: We have done studies that have shown our drivers making "vroom vroom" sounds because the cars are really slow, what can we do?
Ford Engineers: I know! We can put a tube from the engine into the cabin, letting engine noise into the cabin, and therefore prevent our drivers the task of making the sounds themselves!
Ford: GREAT! Sounds like we have a winner on ours hands!


Ford can suck my balls.


and I hate all retro styled cars equally, although I hate ford as a company