I was just lookin on ebay and saw that that escort has their own ebay store. So now I am sure that I got my two choices down. Which one of these would be better with 35.5 ka band.
Rx65 or 8500 non x50
Printable View
I was just lookin on ebay and saw that that escort has their own ebay store. So now I am sure that I got my two choices down. Which one of these would be better with 35.5 ka band.
Rx65 or 8500 non x50
original 8500Quote:
Originally Posted by speed_demon86
dont know much about the 8500 but i know the rx65 does have the capability to change your Ka to USA mode which allows it to be more sensitive to the 3 bands used in the USA instead of always scanning for all the bands in Ka range...hope that helps...and i have never had a problem detecting 35.5 KaQuote:
Originally Posted by speed_demon86
x1Quote:
Originally Posted by happya$$
rx65 works better than escort when I was testing for 35.5Ka band
<-- had RX65 for a month and no problems in town. Going on 3K mi roadtrip over Easter break and look forward to the highway coverage.
I researched until I got to a point of core requirements (not features) and performance (see GOL tests and opinions here). Don't over analyze!
Excellent advice!Quote:
Originally Posted by Toast88
X2Quote:
Originally Posted by happya$$
my rx65 is excellent on ka 35.5..i do not have any experience with the 8500 tho..
Stealthjamal is the expert of 35.5ka. He has THOROUGHLY tested X50's, RX65's, STI's, V1's, 8500, etc. Most of the RD's he tested he tested a FEW samples. He has concluded that the STI and 8500 are the best vs 35.5KaQuote:
Originally Posted by texasspeed