Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    149

    Default Legal implications of RD, jammer, blinder, veil etc in crash

    I am sure this has been answered before, but I couldn't find the answer using the search function.

    What would the legal and insurance impact be if you are involved in an accident and it was due to your speeding if you have a legal/illegal countermeasure on board?

  2. #2
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Indianapolis, IN
    Posts
    2,816

    Default Re: Legal implications of RD, jammer, blinder, veil etc in c

    Quote Originally Posted by Public Enemy No 1
    I am sure this has been answered before, but I couldn't find the answer using the search function.

    What would the legal and insurance impact be if you are involved in an accident and it was due to your speeding if you have a legal/illegal countermeasure on board?
    None, unless you are in VA, DC, or most of Canada.

    GTO_04

  3. #3
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    23

    Default

    not sure how much the gekko from geico would appreciate it. geico is always asking if i wear a seatbelt and if i use a radar detector. of course i have to say yes to the seatbelt and no to the radar detector(they declined me insurance for saying yes).

  4. #4
    Street Lawyer
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    719, Colorado
    Posts
    7,108

    Default

    interesting, i just did a geico quote yesterday, saved $50 on my insurance, and wasn't asked about radar detector at all, I did it online though..

  5. #5
    Professional
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daytona Beach, FL
    Posts
    1,406

    Default

    I believe the gekko has also underwritten the aquisition of lidar units and radar units by LEOs. Probably the most pro radar/lidar and anti RD/LD/LJ insurance company out there.

    Ed

  6. #6
    Professional
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    844

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ipod
    not sure how much the gekko from geico would appreciate it. geico is always asking if i wear a seatbelt and if i use a radar detector. of course i have to say yes to the seatbelt and no to the radar detector(they declined me insurance for saying yes).
    Declined for using a radar detctor!! it figures! I'll tell you why.


    I came across an article several years ago, It had stated that Geico (lizard-headed idiots) had purchased Kustom Radar company or LTI, (i Forget) when they were in trouble to bail them out of a possible bankruptcy.

    Ok so now we have an insurance company that owns a police radar/laser company! Nice!!

    So, what geico does is awards radar units to underfunded polce forces and uses that as a charitable tax write-off.

    Another thing in their philosophy: Geico see's more radar/laser use as a boon to their insurance business, in hopes that one of their insured will be ticketed by the proliferation of free radar/laser units, and they can raise the rates of that customer. So the more radar guns they give away, the more of a chance on of their insured will get ticketed.

    And if someone use's a detector, it levels the paying field again.
    So, this will hurt their plans of raising rates from the radar units they gave away!!

    I urge all of you to research this yourselves so you can drop the "lizard-heads" and go with a more reputable company with local agents!!

    I cannot remember the exact source of this information. But I will reserach it again. Looking into stock info, or investor relations may make the connection.

  7. #7
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    WNY (sometimes)
    Posts
    1,566

    Default

    I remember reading an article in Car and Driver probably 10 years ago, about the Geico Guns. Apparently Geico purchased a whole bunch of radar guns and "donated" them to some cash-strapped police departments. However, to receive the radar, the police dept had to sign a contract where they would actively use the gun for a certain period each day--guaranteeing ticket revenue and the subsequent insurance premium increase (which Geico would profit from.)

    Stay away from this company. Who cares if you saved 50 bucks. The extra 4 dollars per month isn't worth the hassle to support a crooked insurance company like this.

    Jerry.

  8. #8
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Im with Allstate... how are they with this stuff?

    anyone out there that has an experience with them??

    am I really "In good hands with Allstate"??

  9. #9

    Default

    wow, this is all news to me. most of my family switch from state farm -> geico because its much cheaper. but this crap is unacceptable!

  10. #10
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In front of my computer
    Posts
    10,773

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry540i
    Stay away from this company. Who cares if you saved 50 bucks. The extra 4 dollars per month isn't worth the hassle to support a crooked insurance company like this.

    Jerry.
    Indeed!

    Quote Originally Posted by NMA?
    In addition, they cancel your policy and refuse to pay if you have an accident and they find out you own a detector.

    Here's some history on Geico's latest adventures in motorist harrasment:

    The LTI Marksman 20-20 Laser Gun


    Seeing a drop in radar-issued tickets, and hence a
    drop in the number of insurance premiums which
    were surcharged due to citations, the government
    founded GEICO Insurance Company funded a
    project by Laser Technology, Inc. to develop a
    speed measurement device based on their
    distance measurement laser device. This was a
    perfect way for LTI to break out of bankruptcy,
    and back into the market. They quickly
    developed the LTI Marksman 20-20 Laser Gun.
    The deal with GEICO was that in exchange for
    the grant, LTI would give GEICO a certain
    number of free Laser guns annualy, which Geico
    in turn handed over to police departments around
    the United States with fledgling radar-issued
    citations.

    The radar detector industry was quick to react,
    but their efforts proved short in the begining. The devices they produced did in theory work
    perfectly, but not on the road. The problem
    which they soon discovered was that the laser
    beam was very narrow, measuring a mear 3-4 feet
    in diameter at 500 feet, which is usually when an
    officer pulls the triger and obtains a speed
    reading. The laser detectors simply proved
    unsuccessful due to the fact that the laser beam
    spread very little, and also that unlike radar,
    which spreads all over the area, the laser beam
    barely scatters when it hits a vehicle. This allows an officer to look through the viewfinder and single out a vehicle with the crosshairs, just like a rifle, and shoot.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. How is Veil legal???
    By michaelalex17 in forum Laser Veil Stealth Coating
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 07-11-2011, 09:00 PM
  2. Veil Legal in ohio and texas?
    By QuickTrigger in forum Laser Veil Stealth Coating
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 06-19-2009, 04:35 PM
  3. VEIL Legal in VA?
    By asianfire in forum Laser Veil Stealth Coating
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-28-2006, 05:02 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •