Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Lead Foot
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, WA
    Posts
    395

    Default Money no object - what would your car have?

    Just curious which police countermeasures you guys would have your cars outfitted with if money was no object.

    -Detector
    -Laser Jammer(s)
    -CB/Scanner
    -Other

  2. #2
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1,192

    Default

    Military F-117 Stealth coating....That's it :wink:

  3. #3
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Bay City, Michigan
    Posts
    2,204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aaseavey
    Military F-117 Stealth coating....That's it :wink:
    Yeah, I guess that'll work.

  4. #4
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Posts
    6,806

    Default

    Money no object? I'd get a car that can outrun the cops!

    Or an airplane.

    But seriously.. dual LPP/AL on front and rear, V1, maybe a flip or cloak plate if I'm in a photo enforcement area, heck, how about a car that changes color at the push of a button? Blow by a LEO at 40+ over PSL in a red car, LEO has no idea about the identical blue car driving Boy Scout compliant to the PSL that he passes 2 miles down the road...
    If I'm passing you on the right, YOU are in the wrong lane!

    If speed kills, how come I'm still alive?

    Active Countermeasures: V1 3.858, Escort Redline, Beltronics STi-R+, LI Dual 7.1x CPU/8.7 Heads (front)
    Other/Backup Countermeasures: V1 3.813 (loaned to friend), Beltronics Pro RX65 M4 6.3
    Vehicle: 2002 Audi A4 1.8T Quattro
    LEO Toys: Kustom Pro Laser II & III
    Encounters/Saves August 2011: Radar 3/1, Laser 0/0


  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aaseavey
    Military F-117 Stealth coating....That's it :wink:
    I like that. Or maybe I'd just have an old car w/o all the electronic controls and equip it w/an EMP gun to fry all the speed measuring devices used on me. Or maybe just get a radar unit myself and juice it up to put out HIGH wattage (of course concentrated away from me) and again fry offending speed measurement devices.

    Oh wait... then the PD's would have to buy replacements and my taxes would go up! Grrr.. Stealth coating it is!

  6. #6
    Good Citizen
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    St. Louis
    Posts
    186

    Default

    You guys are making it too hard...................... just pay off the cops!!!! :wink:

  7. #7
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    The thing with stealth coating found on MILITARY aircraft is that theyre meant to absorb and not let a reading out to RADAR systems found on Air bases, other aircraft, AA/SAM sites, AWACS planes and stuff like that........those operate on a TOTALLY different bandwidth from our Police RADAR............most longer-range Military RADARs operate on UHF (300-1000 MHz), while some of the smaller ones are Pulse doppler X-band (8-12GHz, for Military purposes...our X-band is a different frequency range), something like this will show up clear as day, like if you were to send an F-117, F-22, or B-2 say into an area equped with RADARs used back in WWII, they'd light up the screen in no time, because they operated on a whole different wavelength (I believe they operated in the HIGHER frequencies like K-Ka, some on L and S too)


    If money was no object for me............ill gladly take a AN/APG-77 RADAR found in the F-22s due to its ability to focus it's RADAR and concentrate it on one point creating a Jamming effect on the Radar on the other side.........sure its alot of radiation, but it'll be a sure fire way to avoid tickets........and it also doubles as a Fire Control RADAR, and well that means.............

  8. #8
    Professional
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Maine
    Posts
    1,192

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arashi666
    The thing with stealth coating found on MILITARY aircraft is that theyre meant to absorb and not let a reading out to RADAR systems found on Air bases, other aircraft, AA/SAM sites, AWACS planes and stuff like that........those operate on a TOTALLY different bandwidth from our Police RADAR............most longer-range Military RADARs operate on UHF (300-1000 MHz), while some of the smaller ones are Pulse doppler X-band (8-12GHz, for Military purposes...our X-band is a different frequency range), something like this will show up clear as day, like if you were to send an F-117, F-22, or B-2 say into an area equped with RADARs used back in WWII, they'd light up the screen in no time, because they operated on a whole different wavelength (I believe they operated in the HIGHER frequencies like K-Ka, some on L and S too)


    If money was no object for me............ill gladly take a AN/APG-77 RADAR found in the F-22s due to its ability to focus it's RADAR and concentrate it on one point creating a Jamming effect on the Radar on the other side.........sure its alot of radiation, but it'll be a sure fire way to avoid tickets........and it also doubles as a Fire Control RADAR, and well that means.............
    ROFL I'm sorry but this is just too much LMAO

  9. #9
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by aaseavey
    Quote Originally Posted by Arashi666
    The thing with stealth coating found on MILITARY aircraft is that theyre meant to absorb and not let a reading out to RADAR systems found on Air bases, other aircraft, AA/SAM sites, AWACS planes and stuff like that........those operate on a TOTALLY different bandwidth from our Police RADAR............most longer-range Military RADARs operate on UHF (300-1000 MHz), while some of the smaller ones are Pulse doppler X-band (8-12GHz, for Military purposes...our X-band is a different frequency range), something like this will show up clear as day, like if you were to send an F-117, F-22, or B-2 say into an area equped with RADARs used back in WWII, they'd light up the screen in no time, because they operated on a whole different wavelength (I believe they operated in the HIGHER frequencies like K-Ka, some on L and S too)


    If money was no object for me............ill gladly take a AN/APG-77 RADAR found in the F-22s due to its ability to focus it's RADAR and concentrate it on one point creating a Jamming effect on the Radar on the other side.........sure its alot of radiation, but it'll be a sure fire way to avoid tickets........and it also doubles as a Fire Control RADAR, and well that means.............
    ROFL I'm sorry but this is just too much LMAO
    which part???????

    sorry im a bit of a military otaku............and the 1st thing, im in school to be an engineer, i just happen to know this stuff

  10. #10
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    In front of my computer
    Posts
    10,773

    Default

    Well, it ain't a good stealth coating if it can't defend against old junk Russian radars from the 1950's used by the enemy eh? :wink:

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. If money was no object...
    By hattrickinc in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 01-02-2009, 04:17 PM
  2. Stealth: if money were no object...?
    By stimyg in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 10-07-2007, 09:55 PM
  3. If money was no object which radar detector would you get??
    By vandaleigh in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 11-30-2006, 10:39 PM
  4. TX - Towns object to ‘speed trap’ tag
    By StlouisX50 in forum News Stories
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-29-2006, 04:56 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •