V-1 VS. STI TEST ON RADARTEST.COM

**V1 Dave** · 01-07-2007, 09:29 AM

Originally Posted by happya$$

Out of curiosity why was the STI tested against the V1 when in previous tests of Mr. Pettersons he determined that the RX65 and X50 were the best detectors? Would he not want to test the STI against "the world's best" X50? Why test the STI against a 3rd place winner? I am just wondering what his logic is
:?:

This is so true!

Originally Posted by happya$$

I like many things on is site except for his radar detector reviews and the only reason is because I can replicate his results for whatever reason. I am thinking it is because of manufacturing variance.

Also known as a possible juiced unit directly from Beltronics!

**happya$$** · 01-07-2007, 09:30 AM

Originally Posted by jimbonzzz

It's great to see that Mr. Peterson hasn't let his 20 year long career as a writer affect his ego.

Jim after all he has been testing as lomg as Sethy has been alive. Maybe if we are still testing after 20 years we will have huge egos ourselves. For crying out loud look at JTW he has an ego the size of the Grand Canyon but I dont think it is because of his testing career but rather because of his height 4'7". It is the short man syndrome for JTW

**SmaartAasSaabr** · 01-07-2007, 03:13 PM

Originally Posted by V1 Dave

Originally Posted by happya$$

I like many things on is site except for his radar detector reviews and the only reason is because I can replicate his results for whatever reason. I am thinking it is because of manufacturing variance.

Also known as a possible juiced unit directly from Beltronics!

But a juiced top-line Bel is pretty hard to do... we all know the "Fuzzbuster with Escort guts" episode but what can you do to an STI to boost the performance? And why wouldn't Bel do it to all of them and make it that much better?

**sphäre** · 01-08-2007, 06:35 AM

Hi
This new test is not real.

Sorry Craig. I`m a owner of a "Valentine one" and a "BEL STI DRIVER". I living in Euope. The Ka-Frequency (Multanova like 34.65 Ghz)
Real is this: The STI DRIVER is a very nice detector with many good characteristics. But sensitivity the Ka-band is not better than the V1.
I think: Both devices are alike.
What is better with the STI? First the "CITY MODE". Second: Invisible to all RDD`s. That`s fine.

**stealthJamal** · 01-08-2007, 07:21 AM

Craig Peterson 'digs his own hole' with his current and past V1 test. My personal theories why Craig does this:

1. He has a personal hate of the V1 and or VR/Mike V. for some reason.
2. He is paid by a V1 competitor to do "fixed" tests.
3. He wants his test to be biased so he will lose crediability. (Self bashing due to a mental disorder.)
4. Combination of more than one in 1 through 3.

For me personally, I enjoy reading Craig's site and considering his perspective on speed enforcement tatics and countermeasure reviews as long as I discard his V1 reviews. I find his site to be mostly a good source of information if you discard his V1 test/reviews.

**Hessen** · 01-08-2007, 08:11 AM

Originally Posted by happya$$

For crying out loud look at JTW he has an ego the size of the Grand Canyon but I dont think it is because of his testing career but rather because of his height 4'7". It is the short man syndrome for JTW

I just fell out of my chair......

**dd61999** · 01-08-2007, 09:16 AM

I think that pm Craig Peterson sent was completely unprofessional.

If he was really concerned about the attacks being made on here. He should have posted on the board his defense in a professional matter. That pm just lowered his credibility even more.

**SmaartAasSaabr** · 01-08-2007, 09:17 AM

Originally Posted by the horn13

Originally Posted by happya$$

For crying out loud look at JTW he has an ego the size of the Grand Canyon but I dont think it is because of his testing career but rather because of his height 4'7". It is the short man syndrome for JTW

I just fell out of my chair......

Our own resident Napoleon...

**happya$$** · 01-08-2007, 09:58 AM

Other than the V1 stuff Mr. Petterson's site is a plethora of knowldge. I have learned A LOT over the years from his site. No one can deny that his is EXTREMELY knowledgable.

**lowkey** · 01-08-2007, 11:35 AM

Originally Posted by dd61999

I think that pm Craig Peterson sent was completely unprofessional.

If he was really concerned about the attacks being made on here. He should have posted on the board his defense in a professional matter. That pm just lowered his credibility even more.

For some reason
the pm that Craig peterson sent you is a fake i think.reason why i say this is because there is know way he will join this forum or send any kind of pm here on this board.why cause he has his own website and blog :wink: