Chosen A New One

[Sparkknocker]

Hey fellas, as most of you know I just got back from Afghanistan about 2 weeks ago. I am looking for another detector for myself. My wife has decided she needs a detector and I sort of agreed. (considering she has been using mine for the last 9 months anyway) :? My plan was to give her my 2 year old RX-65 which works great and get myself something new.

I had a V1 3.826 which of course I loved the features and the look; but mine seemed to have tunnel vision on the ka side of the house. I could probably dig this question out of reading but I was hoping you all could tell me if the V1 has improved performance since the 3.826 days.

More infomation for a decision: Not worried about lidar, no need for immunity of rd detectors. Ka band is my biggest concern.

Thanks for the help in advance...and remember..."I love you all"

[AirMoore]

Thanks for your service first off...


As for the new V1 (We are at .861 now) trying to correct E errors... it may contain a few bugs though... they are still trying to hammer everything out at VR.

A lot of users are trying to revert to older units.


Check out the new GOL testing... (March). That should help your decision (however the RX65 was not run in USA I dont think, but dont quote me on that)... so the results may vary a lot from their testing.

[hookem202]

http://www.guysoflidar.com/march-200...ctor-test.html

[maskellxx]

Thanks for your service first off...

x2

[jerry540i]

Thank you, and God bless.

An active duty ID is usually as good (or better) than any detector. 8)

J/

[proudNMAmember]

Aaseavey, if you are concerned about ka band, then my suggestion is to go w/ either the V1 or the X50.

[Sparkknocker]

Thank you, and God bless.

An active duty ID is usually as good (or better) than any detector. 8)

J/

This is true when not around an Army post. But it seems the local public hates us. We take all their women I guess. Any excuse for a ticket is quite common around the outskirts of post. About an 80 mile radius I would say