• Login:

Closed Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: SEMA 2007

  1. #1
    Administrator radarroy has disabled reputation
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Castle Well Az
    Posts
    3,651

    Default SEMA 2007

    Just got back home after being at SEMA 2007 in Las Vegas.

    Over the next couple days I'll be posting a few new products that I saw at the show along with new product announcements that I'm expecting at CES in January.

    I've just completed my first post about RMR's pending lawsuit against the FCC on the blog

    http://www.radarroy.com/archives/162

    I'd be interested in your comments and if anyone has access to obtaining the court filing in El Paso
    States that I have flown my C-182T to:



    Visit these Other Sites!
    Blog: www.RadarRoy.com
    Buyer's Guide: www.RadarRoysBuyersGuide.com
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: RadarRoy


  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Location
    Advertising world
    Posts
    Many

  3. #2

  4. #3
    Street Lawyer Lucky225 will become famous soon enough
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    719, Colorado
    Posts
    6,812

    Default

    Jury trial was requested, I hope I get called



    Any statements, opinions, written material, forms or similar written or distributed communications contained in my posts are purely available for informational and educational purposes, and are solely my informed opinion and is not legal advice or a substitute for the advice of an attorney. If you are seeking legal advice regarding your particular situation, please consult a[n] [in]competent attorney in your area. I am not a real attorney and my opinions may not be relevant to your particular situation or the facts of your particular case.

    Spoiler: show
    '04 Bonneville SE BLACK.
    Blinder M25 Jammer 2-head(J16) system up front.
    Bel STi-R Remote, X OFF, SWS ON, POP ON, RDR OFF, KA 2/3 - 33.8, 5/6 34.7 and 8/9 35.5 ON, all other KA segments off.
    Roadmaster VR-3 VRVD640G In-dash DVD/GPS system with Speed/Redlight Camera alerts
    Radioshack Pro-97 Triple-Trunk analog scanner
    Cobra 19 ULTRA III CB Radio w/ Little Wil Antenna

    Previous countermeasures:

    2008-2009 Whistler XTR-695

    2006-2008 Passport SRX 2 front, 1 back plate (Fried, sent to KustomEagle)

    October 2002-2006 RadioShack Talking 360 Degree Laser/Radar Detector w/VG-2 Guard Cat #22-1682 non-FCC certified


  5. #4
    Newcomer TheWGP is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Yay PACER!

    Reading through the complaint is kind of funny, given the bit of background I've picked up on the forums/the web in general regarding RMR and their activities.

    The complaint looks to be fairly standard for a start, without looking over it in great detail. RMR's chances of getting the injunction they're asking for *on a PRELIMINARY, TEMPORARY basis* might not be as slim as one might assume, largely because they seem to be basically being put out of business by this ongoing brouhaha. Preserving the status quo during consideration of the case can sometimes be a good thing.

    I thought it was interesting that they have a small, 5-attorney firm representing them in this action, and that includes two (presumably) junior associates who were admitted in 2004 and 2006.

    That may be all they can afford right now, but you'd think you'd pull out all the stops for a lawsuit against a federal agency that's likely to determine whether the company has a future or not... (short of producing products that don't run afoul of the FCC and allegedly not work, which seems unlikely!)

    Also, re jury trial: that's a standard boilerplate that you'll find at the bottom of almost any civil complaint over almost anything. Doesn't mean it'll amount to anything... especially when there are serious questions re: matters of law. But we have the 7th Amendment for a reason...

    In any event, interested in how this one plays out! :wink:

  6. #5
    Professional hookem202 is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,491

    Default

    What can we expect as for new devices? ANy major companys coming out with anything?
    Own:
    V1 w/remote display 3.863
    A Mode/X-band off/ka-more responsive
    Blinder M20
    2 Kicker SoloBarics with 1200watts.



    100% Unbiased Results


    Trusting a $50 RD is like trusting a $.50 rubber. In the end they will both end up costing you more than you planned!

  7. #6
    Professional jerry540i is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    WNY (sometimes)
    Posts
    1,438

    Default

    The RMR losers didn't even get an attorney who can defend the case in Texas. The lawyer signed "Pro Hac Vice" which means that he/she isn't allowed to argue cases in Texas, but must first apply to the Court there to get permission "for this one time."

    J/
    Cogito, ergo sum.

    www.guysoflidar.com

  8. #7
    Administrator radarroy has disabled reputation
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Castle Well Az
    Posts
    3,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jimbonzzz
    Here's a copy of RMR's pending suit:
    http://www.guysoflidar.com/files/rmr_complaint_07.pdf
    Jim, you are amazing!
    Thanks
    States that I have flown my C-182T to:



    Visit these Other Sites!
    Blog: www.RadarRoy.com
    Buyer's Guide: www.RadarRoysBuyersGuide.com
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: RadarRoy


  9. #8
    Newcomer TheWGP is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    37

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jerry540i
    The RMR losers didn't even get an attorney who can defend the case in Texas. The lawyer signed "Pro Hac Vice" which means that he/she isn't allowed to argue cases in Texas, but must first apply to the Court there to get permission "for this one time."

    J/
    I'm assuming these guys are the "usual" attorneys for RMR, and that explains their using them? I really, really, really can't think of any other good reasons for it... If that's the case, then the pro hac vice isn't all THAT unusual. But still, that firm is almost certainly going to be hopelessly outmanned and in for a world of hurt once proceedings start. I'm really not sure that they 100% understand what they're getting into, either RMR or the small firm.

    *grabs popcorn* :twisted:

  10. #9
    Administrator radarroy has disabled reputation
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Castle Well Az
    Posts
    3,651

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hookem202
    What can we expect as for new devices? ANy major companys coming out with anything?
    Just made a new post to the blog
    www.radarroy.com
    States that I have flown my C-182T to:



    Visit these Other Sites!
    Blog: www.RadarRoy.com
    Buyer's Guide: www.RadarRoysBuyersGuide.com
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: RadarRoy


  11. #10
    Administrator radarroy has disabled reputation
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Castle Well Az
    Posts
    3,651

    Default Form Letter

    Hey guys here is a thought, run it by you guys and get your take...

    Lets say we come up with a form letter to the judge in this matter and reqeust that members of the forum use it to make their own letters to send to the court????

    Who knows, we may get 40 or 50 letters off to the judge in the next week and may have some effect in his decision
    States that I have flown my C-182T to:



    Visit these Other Sites!
    Blog: www.RadarRoy.com
    Buyer's Guide: www.RadarRoysBuyersGuide.com
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: RadarRoy



 

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
 
 
Copyright © 2000 - 2008, YourSiteForums.com. All Rights Reserved.
No Duplication Permitted!
vBulletin Skin by CompletevB