• Login:

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 36
  1. #1
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    17

    Default Speed Cameras in Illinois - My 1st Radar Detector

    Here's my story:

    I drive to and from work on a stretch of Illinois tollway that is under construction and will be for about two more years. The speed limit when construction workers are present is 45 mph. The workers are present just about 24 hours a day except on holidays...so the speed limit is 45 pretty much all the time.

    Here's one of the signs that went up a few weeks ago and caused the beginning of my journey:



    I drive approx 20 miles each way to and from work (40 miles roundtrip) on this stretch of Illinois tollway (94/294 from the Wisconsin border to O'hare Airport). I noticed these rather bland signs and then I started seeing hidden cameras in my imagination everywhere I looked! What are those aluminum poles with a box (looks like a camera to me!) halfway up and two solar panels on top? They're everywhere! Big Brother is watching me!

    I did a bit of research on the Illinois Department of Transportation and Illinois State Police websites. I asked some questions here on this website.

    I began to get a much clearer picture of what will be going on.

    There are two Speed Trailers (one facing n/b and one facing s/b) on 94, north of the 294 split (the "spur") that display vehicle's speed and then flash "SLOW DOWN" if they're over 45 mph.

    Apparently the ISP will be using a van equipped with photo radar and deploying it on the side of the road at some point after the Speed Trailers. The idea is that a driver gets a warning from the Speed Trailer and then the photo radar van nabs both a front photo (showing the driver) and a rear photo (showing the license plate) if the vehicle does not slow down.

    Here's the van (from a picture posted previously on this site):



    Let me say this. I am a police officer. I have been for over 20 years. I do not enjoy writing speeding tickets. Not many of my fellow officers do. If we were left to our own devices, we would enforce the traffic laws that we find dangerous or offend our own sense of a "level of violation." By that I mean really, really fast speeds.

    I have written many speeding tickets. But I don't write alot compared to other violations. I am a "car guy." I always have been, I got it from my dad who was a car guy. I own two Mustangs. They are not daily drivers. I read all the car magazines. I think I'm "up" on most of the car world. This photo radar is new to me though.

    I was taught that the driver of a vehicle is responsible for his or her actions and for the actual vehicle they are driving. That is how the law was written and has been enforced for years. If a person borrows a friend's car and it has a headlamp out, or illegally tinted windows, or no license plate light, or a cracked windshield, etc...it is the driver's responsibility to be sure the vehicle is in compliance with the Vehicle Code before they drive it. If a police officer writes a ticket for this type of equipment violation, the citation goes to the driver, not the owner.

    The only time a vehicle's owner gets a ticket is if the car is parked and unattended. Since there is no one in it, then the only way to ticket it, is to ticket the registered owner. I remember my dad being angry at my sister when he received notices from her out-of-state college town of unpaid parking violations because her car was registered in our dad's name.

    But this photo radar and red light camera stuff flies in the face of the way the law has always been written and interpreted. These photo violations are sent to the registered owners and it is up to them to take care of the ticket, even when they were not the driver of the car when the violation took place. I don't like that one bit at all.

    All of my family's vehicles register to me. If my wife or daughter commit a violation, I'm going to get the ticket. Not fun at all.

    One more point. I've never seen this discussed before. This is only for Illinois, but I believe it is the same or very similar in all the other states. A speeding ticket is under the Illinois Vehicle Code (IVC) 625 ILCS 5/11-601(b). That's speeding. Driving 50 in a 35 zone gets you a ticket for 11-601(b).

    Insurance companies and the Department of Transportation (IDOT here in Illinois) say that speeding is a major cause of accidents (whoops, "crashes"...we don't call them accidents anymore). The proof of that is all the tickets for accidents that fall under "speeding." Hmmmmm.

    In 20 years, I have never issued a ticket for speeding while investigating a crash. Never. I have only heard of one incident where a guy got a ticket for speeding because of a crash. He was in a Corvette and going about 95 in a 35 zone. A lady pulled out in front of him. She said, "I saw him way back there and thought I had plenty of time to pull out (if he had been only going 35, she would have had plenty of time indeed). But he came flying up the road and hit me." Truth be told, no matter his speed, she did not yield to his car which had the right of way on the through road while she had a stop sign before she pulled out. But we know that he was truly at fault. Because he was speeding. Only time I ever saw it.

    Now some crashes are bad because of the addition of speed. But there is usually another factor involved. Improper lane use, failure to yield right of way, intoxication, etc. But speed is rarely the "cause" of an accident (oops, I mean crash).

    So why do the insurance companies and IDOT claim speed is the cause? Because I've written more tickets for 11-601(a) than any other over the years. Notice that I said (a) and not (b). The little "a" is for "Failure to reduce speed to avoid an accident." They haven't bothered to change the language over to "crash" in the IVC yet....

    When someone rear ends another car in Illinois, the catch all ticket is 11-601(a). It does not mean that the driver of Vehicle #1 was speeding. Driver #1 could have been going 5 mph approaching a stoplight and glanced over at something and then tapped the car in front of them. That ticket is Failure to reduce speed to avoid an accident.

    See how the insurance companies and IDOT call it speeding when it really isn't? Tricky.

    People blowing stop signs and accelerating through yellow signals to make a traffic light...now those violations cause crashes! I stopped a guy in a brand new Porsche at 2:30 in the morning for 75 mph in a 25 mph zone. It was a newly paved, wide road through the middle of our town. He was in his pajamas. He knew he was getting a ticket. 50 over? Yeah that would be a near record for me back when I was new and got him on radar. I asked him what he was doing in his pj's? He said he just bought the car (yep, he had) and he wanted to see how it drove at speed so he figured he would do it when it was most safe. At the wee hours of the night. I gave him his license back and told him to enjoy. He was flabbergasted. He asked me why I was giving him a break. I said, "You're driving a high performance car with excellent handling, tires and brakes. You're out here at 2:30 am. You're more safe at 75 mph than some idiot in a beater Corolla going just 15 over with 12" tires and a mini spare on one wheel."

    So back to the photo radar. I hope you understand why I don't like it.

    A mailed ticket for speeding in a construction zone here in Illinois is a mandatory court appearance and a $375 fine. If you get the ticket in Cook County (Crook County) then there is an additional $135 fee tacked on. So a first offense is $510!!!!! A second offense is $1,000 (plus add in the $135 if you were in Cook County so that's $1,135) and a 90 day suspension of the registered owner's driver's license. Wow!

    I spoke with an Illinois State Trooper at court the other day while we were both waiting around. He said there are three vans in Illinois. Only one will be deployed in northern Illinois. Only six Troopers are trained and authorized to operate the cameras in the van up north here. The Trooper has the discretion to have the camera take pictures at whatever speed he wants. IDOT says in their online press release that it will be at 11 mph over the 45 mph limit. The Trooper told me that he has heard the guys in the van usually go with 15 over. But they could set it for just 6 over. Ugh. IDOT says the cameras make $25,000 an hour in fines. Yikes!

    Two weeks ago, I made my drive with my cruise control set at 52 mph in the 45 zone. I never passed a single vehicle. Not one! I was passed by more than 500 vehicles (I lost track because one of them was a red Noble...I never saw one before...see, I know my cars because I'm a car nut who reads all the magazines!). I would say I was borderline unsafe going 53 (still 8 mph over the construction zone limit) because other vehicles would rush up behind me in the right lane and slam on their brakes before going around me and cutting off other cars in the center lane. It was a scary test.

    I checked out Radar Roy's site online. I called his tech people. I told them I wanted a radar detector to use in a straight line (not twisty roads, no hills) on the highway to detect photo radar vans. I don't need it for small towns, or speedtraps. I am only afraid of these huge fine, construction zone, photo radar vans.

    The tech said I should be well equipped with the Whistler Pro 78. Yep, the V1, Escort, and Bel STI detectors are better. But they're also twice the cost of the $179 Pro 78. Instead of buying an older, non-upgraded version off Ebay or Amazon, I went with Radar Roy's $179 deal. Here it is mounted inside my Mustang convertible's windshield:



    It emitts X band signal recognition while pointed at Walgreen's automatic opening front doors! I found that out today after opening the box and setting up the detector.


    I begin midnight shift this coming weekend. I'm going to bring it to work and hopefully Sunday will be a slow night. We have Ka, Falcon, instant on radar and one laser unit. I'm going to play around with the Whistler. Hopefully another officer can shoot some radar, leaving it on, trying instant on with me trailing the car being shot at, and then just shooting the radar or laser at me.

    Stay tuned....

  2. #2
    Lead Foot Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    469

    Default

    Hey,

    Thanks for posting. I hope this isn't a stupid question, but...

    Do you know if photo radar tickets can be contested, and what would the grounds be? Since the citation goes to the registered owner of the vehicle what would happen if someone else was driving - clearly, blatantly, unquestionably someone else? Say for example the car is registered to a white male and a black female is photographed driving. Since the cameras are photographing the driver and the plates, it shouldn't be that hard to figure out if the two match up or not. Would this matter at all in court?

    What if the car was stolen?

    There just seem to be some pretty big holes in this logic of only ticketing the registered owner.

    Is the same true of those red light cameras? They are very prevalent in my area.
    08 Honda Civic

    Current Countermeasures:
    V1 - 3.872
    Laser Interceptor Dual

    Used to run with: Passport 8500 X50, Passport 8500, some Rat Shack piece of crap.

  3. #3
    Newcomer Array
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    17

    Default

    I'm not sure on all of the above. I'm just starting out on this road to photo violations. The IDOT website says that the photos will be compared to the description of the registered owner and mailed if they appear to be the same. It sounds like if my wife was driving and the car only checks to me, then there would be no ticket mailed out. That just sounds too good to be true....

    Here's the IDOT press release. It's from 2006 but the same one has been used year after year. Which makes getting current info difficult. But most of the info is correct as far as I can tell:


    "FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    February 9, 2006
    Contacts:
    Matt Vanover (IDOT) 217-558-0517
    Mike Claffey (IDOT) 312-814-3957
    Marisa Kollias (IDOT) 312-814-4693
    Lincoln Hampton (ISP) 312-814-8367
    Joelle McGinnis (Tollway) 630-241-6800 x 2380



    IDOT, ISP & Tollway Unveil Photo Speed Enforcement Van At Chicago Auto Show
    High-Tech vans to target work zone speeders; First time offenders face $375 ticket by mail
    CHICAGO - The State of Illinois’ new photo speed enforcement vans designed to reduce work zone crashes and save lives will be unveiled for the first time at the 2006 Chicago Auto Show. State Troopers will be on hand to preview one of the three vans that will be deployed in Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) work zones in the Chicago area, around the state and on the Illinois Tollway starting with this spring’s construction season.

    “We want the motoring public to get a look at these photo enforcement vans - at the same time they are viewing all the sleek new cars - and to know that we will be bringing the latest in new technology to bear on the problem of work zone speed enforcement,” said IDOT Secretary Timothy W. Martin. “Our goal is to protect the lives of both the many dedicated workers out there trying to improve our highways, as well regular citizens traveling through work zones.”

    The marked white vans are equipped with the latest in photo radar technology designed to record the speed of vehicles and to capture clear images of the driver and the license plate – regardless of the time of day or weather conditions. Tickets will be sent by certified mailed to drivers within six business days. Under the toughened work zone speeding fines that took effect last year, first time offenders face a $375 fine; second time offenders face $1,000 fine and loss of license for 90 days.

    “One of our main priorities is the safety of the public,” said Illinois State Police Director Larry Trent. “This new technology provides our officers with a tool that will assist in our efforts to gain speed limit compliance within the work zones. We're concerned about those passing through, as well as the workers on the highway. Our main goal is to get drivers to obey the warning signs and reduce their speeds to the posted limits. Those who choose to ignore these warnings, placing their lives and the lives of others in danger, will be ticketed.”

    “With the Illinois Tollway’s $5.3 billion Congestion-Relief Program well underway, drivers are seeing more work zones on the Tollway. Photo enforcement vans are an additional resource for State Police to drive home the message that speeding in construction work zones is unacceptable,” said Illinois Tollway Executive Director Jack Hartman. “Speeding, impatience, and driver inattention are the leading factors in work zone crashes, so we need drivers to slow down and stay alert in work zones for their own safety as well as our workers.”

    These vans are an additional state of the art enforcement tool that will be used to help reduce fatalities in work zones. Motorists, as well as workers, are at risk when driving in work zones due to configurations that include narrower lanes, lane jogs and dips, closed shoulders and lane closures. Driving at slower speeds allows motorists more time to react to changed conditions. At least 85 percent of the fatalities in work zones involve motorists.

    The state made progress in reducing the number of work zone fatalities in 2005, thanks in part to toughened work zone speeding fines and to a public education campaign mounted by IDOT, State Police and the Tollway. There were 26 fatalities in work zones in 2005, including one worker. There were 38 work zone fatalities in 2004, including two workers, and 44 such fatalities in 2003, including five workers.

    The vans will be staffed by specially trained State Troopers. The vans will be used in work zones where workers are present. Signs will be placed on project locations where photo enforcement will be occurring. The Troopers will also be responsible for court appearances for the tickets.

    The vans are being provided under a contract with ACS State and Local Solutions, at a cost of $2,950 per month per van, plus a processing fee of $15 per ticket."

  4. #4
    Lead Foot Array
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Dallas/Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    453

    Default Re: Speed Cameras in Illinois - My 1st Radar Detector

    Quote Originally Posted by mm6mm6
    Big Brother is watching me!
    I like your reference to 1984 because I'm actually reading the book in english class. It seems like there are 'telescreens' everywhere these days.

  5. #5
    Power User Array
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    MI / MA
    Posts
    3,594

    Default

    Thanks for the informative post and congrats on your Whistler Pro-78 -- as an owner of an identical-receiver XTR-690 cousin, I will say you will NOT be disappointed with the performance, and more importantly, the customer service experience you get by choosing this fine detector! Bonus points for naming which is the ONLY detector manufacturer to have an engineer here answering questions on a daily basis
    UbuntuForums Administrator
    Ubuntu Linux Developer
    Are you using Linux yet?
    ---
    8500 X50 (M4) BLUE
    V1 3.863, POP ON, 30s automute
    Whistler XTR-690 REV C, 1793SE -- POP OFF

  6. #6
    Lead Foot Array
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Land of Lincoln
    Posts
    465

    Default

    Hello to the group...


    I have been away for a bit. Did run into the ISP speed camera van the other day on US 20 bypass Rockford. Was set up in the construction speed zone at the Rt 2 exchange. Had plenty of warning that he was there. The V1 detected the speed sign setup about 3 miles or more away. Which was after 2 hills / bridges.

    I see they didn't pass the Red Light camera law for Rockford. Doesn't mean they will not try to pass it again later on. Seems Rockford wants the $$$ from those cameras like Chicago (yuck Daley) gets off 'his'.

    Take care,

    Spin

  7. #7
    Administrator Array
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Morristown, Arizona, United States
    Posts
    3,804

    Default

    Here in AZ and many other states rules of court require that the summons (citation) be served by a process server or mailed and and accepted by registered mail.

    So the citation that is mailed by regular mail has no standing.

    However if you don't reply in 15 days to the letter, then they send out the process server.

    As most speeding tickets here in AZ are civil violations the statue of limitations is only 120 days.

    So if you "hide" from the process server the citation has to be dismissed.

    For more info check out: http://www.radarroy.com/links/beattickets.htm
    Radar Detectors and Laser Jammer Reviews
    Motorcycle Mounts and Accessories
    Also Join me at -
    Twitter: RadarRoy
    Facebook: Roy Reyer

  8. #8
    Al from Cheetah Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK & USA
    Posts
    817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jdong
    Bonus points for naming which is the ONLY detector manufacturer to have an engineer here answering questions on a daily basis
    Cheetah???
    ______________________________
    AL

    Email: Al Smith
    Check out Cheetah's YouTube channel





  9. #9
    Professional Array
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    S State
    Posts
    1,092

    Default

    why would a cop need a detector? pro78 is very good ... but i still cant understand why as a cop who gives tickets needs one??? isnt cops and their familes usually have a get out of the tickets for free card....
    Valentine One (3.864)
    Whistler XTR 690 (Rev C)

  10. #10
    Al from Cheetah Array
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    UK & USA
    Posts
    817

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mm6mm6
    photos will be compared to the description of the registered owner and mailed if they appear to be the same. It sounds like if my wife was driving and the car only checks to me, then there would be no ticket mailed out.
    That actually happens in most California towns but I'd be very dounbtful if they do it in IL. Of course, it should be done that way but in reality the ticket processors are too busy so tickets will just be sent out anyway and if there is a case of mistaken identity they figure you'll bring it to their attention later. It's basically a numbers game, if they send them out most people will take care of the ticket rather than contest it.

    Quote Originally Posted by justin81
    Do you know if photo radar tickets can be contested, and what would the grounds be?
    The attitude of the court varies from state to state. In some states, the attitude is "if you say you weren't driving tell us who was or pay the ticket." Because it's often regarded as a civil offence like a parking ticket, they don't care much if you weren't the driver or not, they just want the fine paid.

    In other states, if you go to court and swear your weren't the driver or even provide a sworn affadavit, your ticket can be dismissed.

    Off the top of my head, there are a number of standard excuses which most states will accept.

    1. Car stolen
    2. Car sold and you are no longer the owner of record
    3. Funeral procession
    4. You were following the direct instruction of a police officer
    5. You had to go through the light to avoid an accident (but for this to be accepted you'd better hope the SEMI that was about to rear-end you appears in the video footage taken by the camera.

    Some other family member driving is not normally accepted - They used to call these "snitch tickets" in California.

    Search online and you'll find examples from all over the US where tickets have been sent out to the wrong owners because the ticket processors didn't even get the correct license plate number. Completely innocent drivers then have to take the day off work and have the hassle and expense of going to court to get the ticket dismissed. No wonder most people just pay up. It's cheaper.
    ______________________________
    AL

    Email: Al Smith
    Check out Cheetah's YouTube channel





Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Speed Cameras in Illinois
    By bigbore in forum Photo Enforcement
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-29-2009, 07:53 AM
  2. Illinois Photo Radar Speed Threshold
    By Bigdaddy8344 in forum Photo Enforcement
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 09-10-2008, 09:47 AM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-10-2007, 01:24 PM
  4. Recommendation for good detector for speed cameras
    By LittleOverPSL in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-10-2006, 09:38 PM
  5. The Best Speed Detector (Radar)
    By Iknox in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 04-01-2005, 04:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
 
Copyright © 2000 - 2008, YourSiteForums.com. All Rights Reserved.
No Duplication Permitted!
vBulletin Skin by CompletevB