Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Poor K band

  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005

    Default Poor K band

    Hi there I have a Bel 940 and find the K band very poor is this normal for this detector but Ka is very reliable

  2. #2
    Old Timer
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    New Hampshire

    Default Re: Poor K band

    Does the FCC ID on the bottom of the unit say "M4" or "S7" at the end?

    The M4 version is weaker on K band, same is true on my RX65. It's still decent though.

    If K band is a primary threat in your area you may want to go for a V1, an older X50 or older Bel 940/955/RX65.
    If I'm passing you on the right, YOU are in the wrong lane!

    If speed kills, how come I'm still alive?

    Active Countermeasures: V1 3.858, Escort Redline, Beltronics STi-R+, LI Dual 7.1x CPU/8.7 Heads (front)
    Other/Backup Countermeasures: V1 3.813 (loaned to friend), Beltronics Pro RX65 M4 6.3
    Vehicle: 2002 Audi A4 1.8T Quattro
    LEO Toys: Kustom Pro Laser II & III
    Encounters/Saves August 2011: Radar 3/1, Laser 0/0



Similar Threads

  1. Poor Guy
    By snoopyc4 in forum News Stories
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-24-2009, 12:24 PM
  2. Poor Ka Band Detection
    By opilot87 in forum Whistler
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-29-2008, 10:18 AM
  3. Poor K & Ka Band Performance on X50
    By raggededge in forum Escort
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-28-2008, 05:48 PM
  4. Poor Ka band range with Stalker ATR
    By computersoc in forum Valentine One
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-31-2007, 09:07 AM
  5. Poor man's STi.
    By StatsCan in forum Radar Detectors - General
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 01-15-2006, 04:19 PM


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts