Who wants K band segmentation?
Who wants K band segmentation?
I want Ka-Band Segmentation, but to do so on K-Band would be like Truelocking an area the size of...........EARTH!
A real LEO can show up anywhere in the 200 Mhz bandwidth just like a door sensor. I don't use the term often, but this idea is FAIL.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
K band segmentation is simply not useful in the US.
Extremely useful for countries outside the centre of the universe
Perhaps........if the LEOs on your part of the planet do not use mobile K-Band radars. I suppose cutting out the upper portions of the K-Band spectrum might not be such a risk if the only units you face are photo radars which are centered down around 24.100 Mhz (+/- 25 Mhz) like the AGD340.
However, if normal K-Band radar is used in your area (24.150 +/- 100 Mhz) I think K-Band segmentation is too much of a risk.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Only joking guys. But in 99% of Australia only Ka is used for mobile.
K band for fixed. Ka in WA for multanovas.
Mobile camera van K band is a known frequency and blocking out all the other crap would be my dream RD................until they bring out LIDAR vans.
Except for the fact if you live in a reasonably small town and there's this one particular car LEO's just cant get a speed reading on.
Bend over and brace yourself for the pineapple.
The laws long arm would make it even more painful.
Might help if you have worms though.
Bookmarks