Ok everybody its time to be real(honest). Were always having debates on why the v1 is better than the rx65 and how the rx65 is better than the v1. How the x50 has better k detec than the rx65 and the rx65 has better detec on ka than the x50. How the v1 has the best laser detec but the x50 is 2nd in line and then rx65, but once you get a laser reading its to late anyways right? I could go all day because we all know its always be debated about. But look at the numbers. When it comes down what makes which detector best what really counts? Forget all the features and tones and muiltiy threats,and etc. Lets keep it simple and say what we all want is just to know when were approaching a LEO tracking speed. So when we normally say and the reviews do too, all the rd are side by side. If the rx65 alerts you to a LEO .20 seconds faster than the x50, does that make the x50 better? X50 gives you .30 of a sec than the v1 does that make the x50 better than the v1? If the v1 gives you a 1sec faster detec than the x50 on a laser hit does that make the v1 that much better? When you really look at it all 3 will pretty much on a average be within 1 sec of each other. Saying "one thousand one" is the time that seperates each rd. So how much of a 1 to 2 sec diffrence really matters everybody when they all give you at least a mile warning to slow down before you even could get clocked?