Personally my x50 best ka range on a real speed trap has been from 1.5 miles away on ka and 2.1 miles on k band. So if the V1 and rx65 would have gave me a 1.8 mile warning on ka and would have gave me 2:57 min of warning time befor passing the LEO and the x50 gave me 1.5 miles of warning time which gave me 3 min of warning time before passing the LEO clocking cars, should I really be concern that the x50 has ka problems. If the V1 gave me a 2.3 warning on a k band trap that took 3.58 befor crossing the LEO and my x50 gave a 2.1 mile warning that gave me 4 min before passing the LEO should I feel concern that the V1 came out ontop. If my x50 gave me 4min of warning time from 2 miles away from the LEO and the Sti gave a 1.5 mile warning that gave you 3min of warning time before passing the LEO means that the Sti k band "lacks"? If the V1 and x50 has better laser detection than the rx65. Does that make the V1 that much better by telling you, your about to get a ticket before the x50 andrx65 would? So when you add the features it evens up the board alot I would say. But when you really look at the numbers, seconds only seprate these top 4. So if all the top 4 are given us 3 and 4 min of warning time before the LEO is a threat who cares that one gives you 2 seconds of warning time before the other. But nobody wants to belive that so will continue saying" mines better than yours!"