Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Power User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,054

    Default NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    Hey guys, someone is selling a Pro 164 scanner. I know that highway patrol, state troopers, etc use digital signals, but will this pick them up? I think it does from what I read. Any help would be appreciated.

  2. #2
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,540

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    Quote Originally Posted by Solidjake View Post
    Hey guys, someone is selling a Pro 164 scanner. I know that highway patrol, state troopers, etc use digital signals, but will this pick them up? I think it does from what I read. Any help would be appreciated.
    Where do these rumors keep coming from??? 2nd time in a week I've read that about NYST on here and never seen anything behind it.

    NYPD should all be in the clear based on...
    New York County, New York (NY) Scanner Frequencies and Radio Frequency Reference

    NYSP should be monitorable on this EDACS system
    State of New York: METRO-21 (Metro NYC) Trunking System, New York, New York - Scanner Frequencies

    Nassau Co is worth programming, but not likely going to hear much; plenty of listening in Suffolk

    EDACS is harder to program, but the audio on it should still be analog making the 164 useable for it. I'd suggest using some software unless you really enjoy keystrokes (I can and have multiple trunked systems on my by hand it's just a comparative PITA)

    The biggest issue with listening is going to be overcoming the NY scanner laws.

  3. #3
    Power User
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    4,054

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    Thank you for the info.

  4. #4
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Central TN
    Posts
    581

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    The PRO 164 will pickup digital transmissions as long as they are not encrypted.

  5. #5
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,540

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    Quote Originally Posted by Swamp View Post
    The PRO 164 will pickup digital transmissions as long as they are not encrypted.
    False, the 164 will NOT handle digital voice, Digital Trunking is not the same as digital voice which is not the same as encryption.

  6. #6
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Central TN
    Posts
    581

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    Quote Originally Posted by Motor On View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Swamp View Post
    The PRO 164 will pickup digital transmissions as long as they are not encrypted.
    False, the 164 will NOT handle digital voice, Digital Trunking is not the same as digital voice which is not the same as encryption.
    I was looking for this post to correct what I said above...I have a PRO-106 not a PRO-164, so I can't comment on the 164.

  7. #7
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    NYPD is not digital they are analog UHF. And honestly if you live in the city, the best thing to get is UHF commercial radio.

  8. #8
    Yoda of Radar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    14,449

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil424 View Post
    NYPD is not digital they are analog UHF. And honestly if you live in the city, the best thing to get is UHF commercial radio.
    That's for sure. The intermod in the city is horrendous. It takes a tight front end to reject all the interference on UHF. Used Scrotorolas are cheap on teh eBay.

    "Buy the BEST and screw the rest." - fire65

    "im intrested to see how well you do.i never seen a car JTG before would be a first for me.." - radarrob

  9. #9
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,540

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    Quote Originally Posted by Stealth Stalker View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Phil424 View Post
    NYPD is not digital they are analog UHF. And honestly if you live in the city, the best thing to get is UHF commercial radio.
    That's for sure. The intermod in the city is horrendous. It takes a tight front end to reject all the interference on UHF. Used Scrotorolas are cheap on teh eBay.
    But teh programming is a beech.

    Agreed though, urban areas band specific commercial radio receivers are superior.

  10. #10
    Newcomer
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    28

    Default Re: NYC and Pro 164 scanner

    The programming is not hard at all. If you get a motorola radio, yeah programming is a pain in the ass and the software is not free. All my radios are Vertex Standard. Very easy to program and the software is free all you need to buy is the cable. NYPD carrys the Vertex 537 which is a brick and is 400 dollars. Depending on how many frequencies you want to store I can reccomend you a radio.

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. Best digital scanner prices of 2009-2010 - Radio Shack Scanner Sale
    By StlouisX50 in forum Scanners, Ham Radios, & CB's
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-11-2010, 08:45 AM
  2. Just got my new GRE PSR-500 Scanner
    By Eleggua in forum Scanners, Ham Radios, & CB's
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 09:53 PM
  3. CB or Scanner
    By bentandbroken in forum Scanners, Ham Radios, & CB's
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 10-11-2007, 08:22 PM
  4. GRE 500 Scanner - Pro-97 too?
    By Eleggua in forum Scanners, Ham Radios, & CB's
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-30-2007, 12:59 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •