Even in the RMR stuff, the lazer part is "active", you can see the infrared emitter in some of JTW's videos.Originally Posted by stalkervision
|
|
|
|
|
Even in the RMR stuff, the lazer part is "active", you can see the infrared emitter in some of JTW's videos.
rmr
how the hell do people think they work!
people are brainwashed with fm chirp!
my snooper does a better job of jamming! it jams neighbours satellite! but only affects some channels!
we had this since 1998... when we didnt have internet connection and we didnt know about radar detectors!
its saved us from a few gatsos and it picked up a mini gatso once!!
but ive been through loads of laser traps and its never gone off!
only recently we have theses camera vans..... and even them cant set it off! i did learn that hifi tv remotes set the detector off so i tried and low and behold it went off a laser alert!
shame it cant perform like the v1 on laser!
but i dont think anything can touch the detection of laser on the v1!
mikes phillosphy is not jamming but detecting so he uses the best detection available!
if thats what mike can do on the detection side i wonder what jamming he can do!
we will never know!! but i do think that if he did make a laser jammer i cant see anyother jammer coming close!!
it must be funny driving down the street looking at the v1 and saying i've made that!
i dont know anyone who can do that! apart from mike that is!
Why L
I was wondering why you recommended driving with "Advanced Logitec" mode on. After reading the Manual for the V1 I was under the assumption that it was like a city mode. Obviously I know that the V1 would never reduce sensativity, but to reduce falsing.
Actually I believe it could be done, but not in a way that is practical for actual use.don't think it's possible huh?? :wink: I sense a critical tone here jim. :cry:
I've been wrong before though.
One possible method might be the "spinning corner reflector" idea:
See this guy's page on it:
http://www.billzilla.org/ideas8.htm
And this patent:
http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-P...number=5673049
Would this work, and would it be practical? I don't know...
Jim
Seomthing similar to that was tested on mythbusters. It caused a little different doppler tone, but didn't jam anything. Maybe if it was a little larger though....
Yeah, I saw that... They just used mirrors or something, and not tuned corner reflectors. But since just the mirrors were enough to at least effect the doppler tone, this corner reflector method might have a fighting chance of working...
A lot of the stuff they tested on that episode was kind of lame...
Yeah, I was sort of annoyed they just tryed to put typical LED lights around a license plate and expect it to jam laser. Unfortunately that might suggest to a lot of people that the Blinder/Zr3/LP905 won't work since it uses LEDs, which we all know isn't the case. I really just think that some of the things should have been explained a little better, but I do understand that the people on this forum can grasp the concepts a lot better than the general public, and after all, they only have 30 minutes to play with. Just think how much time some of us have spent at this forum!
Yeah, and they used the magnetron which was probably at ~2 GHz thinking it would have a chance at actually doing something. Now maybe if they were testing against ancient S-Band radar it would have
Since a tuning fork can give you a 35mph reading when testing a radar gun... I wonder if you put tuningforks on the front of your car all vibrating at a 500mph rate, would this confuse the radargun?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks