Has anyone else that has owned both the X50 and V1 feel that that Ka range was better on the X50?
I have seen the Lab sensitivity testing numbers, and GOL test results etc. but in real world experiences - it just seems that my X50 gets better Ka range than my V1. :roll:
CHP uses 34.7 (which the V1 is supposed to own) and I have seen one 35.5 before (thanks SpecDisplay).
I think my V1 gets better K range than my X50 though...