Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Speed Demon
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    oklahoma
    Posts
    584

    Default A MESSAGE FROM THE "V1 HATERS"

    It has come to my attention that some of the people on this forum are under the impression that Arashi666, Bear-Tweezy, and myself are "V1 Haters. This is not true, and to avoid any more occurrences of reading posts from morons who don't take the time to find out our true views, I am going to set the record straight. None of us has EVER said that we hate the V1, in fact we acknowledge it, (along with the Rx65), to be a fantastic detector. We offer an alternate option, based on our experiences, for people who are looking for a good detector, or are tired of the issues that the V1 is having. I for one plan on purchasing a Valentine because it is an OUTSTANDING detector, and Arashi is also wanting to purchase a Valentine unit. We simply grow tired of all the Zombies going on and on about the arrows. The arrows are secondary to function. Then, someone want to talk bogey counters...ok...yes, the valentine can track up to 9 sources, but it can not tell you what band everyone of those sources is. The x50 can...that is useful. Once again...we do not hate the V1, so the comments can stop now.

  2. #2
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Port St. Lucie, FL
    Posts
    1,844

    Default Re: A MESSAGE FROM THE "V1 HATERS"

    Quote Originally Posted by jdreynss
    It has come to my attention that some of the people on this forum are under the impression that Arashi666, Bear-Tweezy, and myself are "V1 Haters. This is not true, and to avoid any more occurrences of reading posts from morons who don't take the time to find out our true views, I am going to set the record straight. None of us has EVER said that we hate the V1, in fact we acknowledge it, (along with the Rx65), to be a fantastic detector. We offer an alternate option, based on our experiences, for people who are looking for a good detector, or are tired of the issues that the V1 is having. I for one plan on purchasing a Valentine because it is an OUTSTANDING detector, Bear, and Arashi are also wanting to purchase Valentine units. We simply grow tired of all the Zombies going on and on about the arrows. The arrows are secondary to function. Then, someone want to talk bogey counters...ok...yes, the valentine can track up to 9 sources, but it can not tell you what band everyone of those sources is. The x50 can...that is useful. Once again...we do not hate the V1, so the comments can stop now.
    Sorry Jas but i have already owned one and returned it cuz of the stupid "E" thing

  3. #3
    Radar Fanatic
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Port St. Lucie, FL
    Posts
    1,844

    Default

    oh yeah and none of us three work for Escort or BEL

  4. #4
    Power User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Southlake, TX
    Posts
    4,136

    Default

    I second

    id like one too, bur cant justify a 400 dollar purchase (OF ANYTHING) at this time


    I dont work at Escort, im buried behind my college courses :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

 

 

Similar Threads

  1. V940 with "Service Required" message!
    By BamaE92 in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 06-27-2009, 01:14 PM
  2. Why a "Service Required" Message?
    By radarTom in forum Escort
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 06-24-2006, 10:58 AM
  3. new sti gets "service required" message
    By novazo6 in forum Beltronics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-14-2006, 05:16 AM
  4. How to avoid seeing the "Self-Cal" message?
    By tjbender in forum Escort
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 12-19-2005, 07:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •