Radar Detector Jammer Forum


If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.



Notices

Reply
Old 09-04-2008   #21 (permalink)
Power User
 
djrams80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles Area
Posts: 4,324
djrams80 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigalinwv View Post
Am I missing something? 55 feet difference? At speed that would equate to about a tenth of a second, hardly what I would call noticeable. And I owned (past tense) a 9500i. Very pathetic on performance, my S7 X50 absolutely crushed it on K band. But 55 feet???
BY any chance, was your 9500i in auto mode for this test? If so, the 9500i would intentionally desensitize K band by some factor, depending on the speed of the vehicle. But, I'm sure you know this. My 9500i(x) is very sensitive. It's not as sensitive as my V1 on any band, but I'd say it's in the ballpark on every band but X.
__________________
Mustang GT Convertible, 20" TSW Nogaros, Eibach Pro-Kit Springs
9500ci, Veil, V1 3.864 hardwired high with X and K off,
9500ix confiscated by the woman and hardwired high in her car .
TruSpeed enabled Laser Interceptor Quad System.
djrams80 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #22 (permalink)
Good Citizen
 
senfinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 163
senfinger is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Let me re-phrase 55ft Average... It felt about 5-6 car lengths of a difference from a noticeable object.

So!!! It could have been more or less; and yes as stated above it was in "A Mode" between 45-55mph.

At 50mph it could have been a 12 car difference... LoL (OCD guy vs. GOL w/tools!)

Judging by what I saw and felt; it was a difference worth keeping the V1; otherwise I would be mailing my RD in tomorrow.

__________________

V1 3.864 *Current*
Escort 8500x50
Escort 8500
Escort 7500

Last edited by senfinger; 09-05-2008 at 12:37 AM..
senfinger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #23 (permalink)
Good Citizen
 
ATSRADAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 148
ATSRADAR is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by djrams80 View Post
BY any chance, was your 9500i in auto mode for this test? If so, the 9500i would intentionally desensitize K band by some factor, depending on the speed of the vehicle. But, I'm sure you know this. My 9500i(x) is very sensitive. It's not as sensitive as my V1 on any band, but I'd say it's in the ballpark on every band but X.
I have a Belscort and don't understand the auto mode. How does that work? I'm afraid to try it.
__________________

V1 3.864 (hardwired, concealed display)
8500 X50 blue (city use)
Blinder M25 J15
ATSRADAR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #24 (permalink)
Good Citizen
 
senfinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 163
senfinger is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATSRADAR View Post
I have a Belscort and don't understand the auto mode. How does that work? I'm afraid to try it.
On the 9500i and ix X-Mode adjust the sensitivity of the alerts by speed. A lot of people use it for city mode... So if you are going 60-70 it will be at full alert... 35-40 no... something like that-

One of my friends stated that the Speed-limits will be the next db to add to RDs; so that way it can alert you at a custom mph based off GPS/Current Speed Limit.


BTW I like your sig... lol the whole 3.864 thing...
__________________

V1 3.864 *Current*
Escort 8500x50
Escort 8500
Escort 7500

Last edited by senfinger; 09-05-2008 at 12:58 AM..
senfinger is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #25 (permalink)
Power User
 
djrams80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles Area
Posts: 4,324
djrams80 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATSRADAR View Post
I have a Belscort and don't understand the auto mode. How does that work? I'm afraid to try it.
The auto mode on the 9500i/ix/ci are nothing like that of the X50. The X50's auto mode looks for pairs of weak radar signals and filters them out, since door openers usually come in pairs. It's not a very effective false alert eliminator, but it does help a little. The 9500i/ix/ci's auto mode is GPS based and varies X and K band sensitivity with vehicle speed. For instance, under 15mph, such as crawling through a shopping center, the 9500i/ix/ci will remain dead quiet, while every other RD on the market will alert to these radar sources as normal. The 9500i/ix/ci does not lessen Ka band sensitivity under any circumstance however, since this is almost always a real threat.
__________________
Mustang GT Convertible, 20" TSW Nogaros, Eibach Pro-Kit Springs
9500ci, Veil, V1 3.864 hardwired high with X and K off,
9500ix confiscated by the woman and hardwired high in her car .
TruSpeed enabled Laser Interceptor Quad System.
djrams80 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #26 (permalink)
Good Citizen
 
ATSRADAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 148
ATSRADAR is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by senfinger View Post
BTW I like your sig... lol the whole 3.864 thing...
I heard rumors of a 3.871 and realized that was for upgrades. I got NOS. It's cool, she runs like a champ! This is my 4th V1, love them all. Even the one with the ghost in the machine.

__________________

V1 3.864 (hardwired, concealed display)
8500 X50 blue (city use)
Blinder M25 J15
ATSRADAR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #27 (permalink)
Good Citizen
 
ATSRADAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 148
ATSRADAR is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by djrams80 View Post
The auto mode on the 9500i/ix/ci are nothing like that of the X50. The X50's auto mode looks for pairs of weak radar signals and filters them out, since door openers usually come in pairs. It's not a very effective false alert eliminator, but it does help a little. The 9500i/ix/ci's auto mode is GPS based and varies X and K band sensitivity with vehicle speed. For instance, under 15mph, such as crawling through a shopping center, the 9500i/ix/ci will remain dead quiet, while every other RD on the market will alert to these radar sources as normal. The 9500i/ix/ci does not lessen Ka band sensitivity under any circumstance however, since this is almost always a real threat.
Thanks for your help on that. Of the two windshield versions of the 9500, which do you like the best? I need portability.
__________________

V1 3.864 (hardwired, concealed display)
8500 X50 blue (city use)
Blinder M25 J15
ATSRADAR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #28 (permalink)
Power User
 
djrams80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles Area
Posts: 4,324
djrams80 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by ATSRADAR View Post
Thanks for your help on that. Of the two windshield versions of the 9500, which do you like the best? I need portability.
9500ix, hands down. The autolearn is fantastic and the RLC database is useful also.
__________________
Mustang GT Convertible, 20" TSW Nogaros, Eibach Pro-Kit Springs
9500ci, Veil, V1 3.864 hardwired high with X and K off,
9500ix confiscated by the woman and hardwired high in her car .
TruSpeed enabled Laser Interceptor Quad System.
djrams80 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #29 (permalink)
Good Citizen
 
ATSRADAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 148
ATSRADAR is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by djrams80 View Post
9500ix, hands down. The autolearn is fantastic and the RLC database is useful also.
How about the warning distance on the fixed sites? Isn't it the weakest of the three? In the owners manual it give a distance "or" 10 seconds. How does it decide which?

__________________

V1 3.864 (hardwired, concealed display)
8500 X50 blue (city use)
Blinder M25 J15

Last edited by ATSRADAR; 09-05-2008 at 01:32 AM..
ATSRADAR is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2008   #30 (permalink)
Experienced
 
NeonSector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 242
Blog Entries: 1
NeonSector is on a distinguished road
Send a message via ICQ to NeonSector Send a message via AIM to NeonSector Send a message via MSN to NeonSector
Default Re: Valentine 1 (3.864) vs. 9500ix MYReview

Quote:
Originally Posted by djrams80 View Post
9500ix, hands down. The autolearn is fantastic and the RLC database is useful also.
So you think the ix is way better than the i?
I dont know anyone with an IX to see for my self, but it seems to be getting ok reviews for users so far.
__________________
Escort 9500ix (amazing)
3.864 (concealed thin display)
Once you go V1... you will never look back
http://www.youtube.com/user/neonsector
NeonSector is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Go Back   Radar Detector Jammer Forum » Radar Detector Forums » Valentine One

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:57 AM. Copyright 2004 - 2008 Reyer and Associates and Netshops Inc.