GOL Test Results - Question

[snoopyc4]

I tried posting this question in the "GOL Wrapped Up" thread but I didn't get a clear cut answer. With KA guard ON, would the performance of the 3.872 be equal or near the performance of the 3.864 that has KA guard ON? Also, with KA guard OFF, would the performance of the 3.864 be equal to or near the performance of the 3.872 that has KA guard OFF?

[CJR238]

I tried posting this question in the "GOL Wrapped Up" thread but I didn't get a clear cut answer. With KA guard ON, would the performance of the 3.872 be equal or near the performance of the 3.864 that has KA guard ON? Also, with KA guard OFF, would the performance of the 3.864 be equal to or near the performance of the 3.872 that has KA guard OFF?

I think some detailed additional testing of this should be done. Depending on the additional sensitivity it may be worth the extra falsing.

[Cips]

I tried posting this question in the "GOL Wrapped Up" thread but I didn't get a clear cut answer. With KA guard ON, would the performance of the 3.872 be equal or near the performance of the 3.864 that has KA guard ON? Also, with KA guard OFF, would the performance of the 3.864 be equal to or near the performance of the 3.872 that has KA guard OFF?

I think some detailed additional testing of this should be done. Depending on the additional sensitivity it may be worth the extra falsing.

Many members here have self tested the Ka Guard On/Off settings and the results are better sensitivity and range with Ka Guard Off, but they say (depending on where you live) the 'falses' are unbearable, even more so than a V1 with POP On.

[CJR238]

I think some detailed additional testing of this should be done. Depending on the additional sensitivity it may be worth the extra falsing.

Many members here have self tested the Ka Guard On/Off settings and the results are better sensitivity and range with Ka Guard Off, but they say (depending on where you live) the 'falses' are unbearable, even more so than a V1 with POP On.[/quote]

Cool, thanks. but my guess is if you set Big L with the right time and signal strength release it may still be fine? The only problem i would see is falsing from cobras.

[Cips]

I think some detailed additional testing of this should be done. Depending on the additional sensitivity it may be worth the extra falsing.

Many members here have self tested the Ka Guard On/Off settings and the results are better sensitivity and range with Ka Guard Off, but they say (depending on where you live) the 'falses' are unbearable, even more so than a V1 with POP On.

Cool, thanks. but my guess is if you set Big L with the right time and signal strength release it may still be fine? The only problem i would see is falsing from cobras.
[/quote]

Something got messed up with the quoting. Answer is in green. I'm a little confused here. Big L only effects K and X alerts. The excessive falsing with Ka Guard Off is on Ka, so Big L would do nothing for it.

[TQUILL]

I've had mine with Ka gaurd off and the falsing is ridiculous. I had to turn it back on after less than a day.

[OPTiK]

... reposted in other thread

[happya$$]

Remember that any V1 3.851 and after will display an "E" when it is out of tune

[OPTiK]

Remember that any V1 3.851 and after will display an "E" when it is out of tune

Hmm, but whats the threshold? How out of tune does it have to be before you see an "E"?

[v1user]

Remember that any V1 3.851 and after will display an "E" when it is out of tune

"E" day was the worst day of my life. After a few days without it people started asking me why I was arriving later than usual.