Just got this today. Seems good so far. Kind of like YaV1 for the iPhone.
Finally a very nice V1 app for us iPhone users.
Just got this today. Seems good so far. Kind of like YaV1 for the iPhone.
Finally a very nice V1 app for us iPhone users.
ALERT: Purchase the latest Veil G5 Direct from the Manufacturer or from one of our Authorized Dealers at the Veil Store.
Stay informed with the latest industry news and product reviews Veil Guy's Radar Detector Reviews.
Experience real-world encounters as they actually happened on the open road, from the pioneer of this bonafide real-world testing format. Visit Veil Guy's radar detector videos.
Socialize with the Veil Guy: Google+, Facebook
How do you keep Driver from locking out a location that usually has LEO shooting K or Ka radar?
Should not lock out a diff frequency. The frequency would have to be exact or close.
but you can manually override if it was a problem. The program is very user friendly and
eacy to customize.
Can some please help me with 2016 V1 sweeps I know that
s0 is 33.8 mph from default. what should go below?
s1
s2
s3
s4
s5
s6
I spent a lot of time experimenting with different sweep patterns and found this the best in my experiences. Others who have tried these have expressed good performance.
Here they are:
I call my profile, CENTER WEIGHTED INTERLEAVED SWEPT PATTERN:
S0: 33.768-33.900 (wide, default, always engaged)
S1: 34.681-34.740 (tight, center weighted)
S2: 35.482-35.541 (tight, center weighted)
S3: 33.782-33.841 (tight, center weighted)
S4: 35.394-35.600 (wide)
S5: 34.774-34.804 (wide)
S6: 34.593-34.770 (wide)
Note: Sweeps S4-S6, can be widened if one wishes to expand inclusion of guns further out of center.
Order may (haven't definitively proven to myself that it has) have a positive impact and is designed (at least, theoretically) to maximize the opportunity of the V1 to catch very brief glimpses of Kal, Kam, and Kah each. From an overall timing sequence order may not be significant, but I am trying to afford the V1 the best opportunity to be in the neighborhood when a signal comes along by interleaving them. All I can say is that I see a definite pop in liveliness overall with the above pattern. 33.8 now consistently bests all my seg'd M3s. 34.7 often enough to notice. 35.5 not seen enough (in my areas) to make a definitive determination either way (but expect it would improve).
Misc Options:
Self mute logic: ON
Time Period: 3
No muting above 3 on first alert: ON
Unmute above 5: ON
K Rear Mute: ON
Out of box muting out 100mhz centers on Ka: ON
Traffic Monitor Filter: ON (to filter out obnoxious K-band Audi-like systems for those requiring K reception).
Other bands ON (as required for area), except Ku.
Good luck!
ALERT: Purchase the latest Veil G5 Direct from the Manufacturer or from one of our Authorized Dealers at the Veil Store.
Stay informed with the latest industry news and product reviews Veil Guy's Radar Detector Reviews.
Experience real-world encounters as they actually happened on the open road, from the pioneer of this bonafide real-world testing format. Visit Veil Guy's radar detector videos.
Socialize with the Veil Guy: Google+, Facebook
thanks so much have you been using these since 2014?
did you revise your post to this? If so which one is better?
So 33.768-33.900 wide default always on
S1 34.681-34.740 tight center weighted
S2 35.482-35.541 tight center weighted
S3 33.782-33.841 tight center weighted
S4 34.593-34.770 wide
S5 34.774-34.804 wide
S6 35.394-35.600 wide
I have made some edits to my original post and I also want to say that I am going to further experiment with swapping positions of S5 & S6 with S4, to balance (spread) out even more the interleave--from an overall timing perspective--of the last "two" Ka sweeps.
That revised profile would look something like:
REVISED CENTER WEIGHTED INTERLEAVED SWEPT PATTERN:
S0: 33.768-33.900 (wide, default, always engaged)
S1: 34.681-34.740 (tight, center weighted)
S2: 35.482-35.541 (tight, center weighted)
S3: 33.782-33.841 (tight, center weighted)
S4: 34.593-34.770 (wide)
S5: 34.774-34.804 (wide)
S6: 35.394-35.600 (wide)
When looking at it on "paper" now, I like the look of this one perhaps even more.
Take your pick and let me know either way what you have found with either (or both) of these.
VG
Last edited by Veil Guy; 06-30-2014 at 04:35 PM.
Last edited by Electronicdude; 08-07-2016 at 10:40 PM.
Yes. The modified sweep was suggested by an online member named Windstrings. The V1 automatically interleaves 33.8 sweeps multiple time, so he suggested throwing another 34.7 instead of a 33.8. And it seemed to do just fine. That's what I have been running ever since.
VG
ALERT: Purchase the latest Veil G5 Direct from the Manufacturer or from one of our Authorized Dealers at the Veil Store.
Stay informed with the latest industry news and product reviews Veil Guy's Radar Detector Reviews.
Experience real-world encounters as they actually happened on the open road, from the pioneer of this bonafide real-world testing format. Visit Veil Guy's radar detector videos.
Socialize with the Veil Guy: Google+, Facebook
Thank you so much so I'll try second one. What does second seem to do better? Is it because you but same freqs in a row?
How much better do you think this is then
I spent a lot of time experimenting with different sweep patterns and found this the best in my experiences. Others who have tried these have expressed good performance.
Here they are:
I call my profile, CENTER WEIGHTED INTERLEAVED SWEPT PATTERN:
S0: 33.768-33.900 (wide, default, always engaged)
S1: 34.681-34.740 (tight, center weighted)
S2: 35.482-35.541 (tight, center weighted)
S3: 33.782-33.841 (tight, center weighted)
S4: 35.394-35.600 (wide)
S5: 34.774-34.804 (wide)
S6: 34.593-34.770 (wide)
2nd one what is different?
have made some edits to my original post and I also want to say that I am going to further experiment with swapping positions of S5 & S6 with S4, to balance (spread) out even more the interleave--from an overall timing perspective--of the last "two" Ka sweeps.
That revised profile would look something like:
REVISED CENTER WEIGHTED INTERLEAVED SWEPT PATTERN:
S0: 33.768-33.900 (wide, default, always engaged)
S1: 34.681-34.740 (tight, center weighted)
S2: 35.482-35.541 (tight, center weighted)
S3: 33.782-33.841 (tight, center weighted)
S4: 34.593-34.770 (wide)
S5: 34.774-34.804 (wide)
S6: 35.394-35.600 (wide)
When looking at it on "paper" now, I like the look of this one perhaps even more.
Take your pick and let me know either way what you have found with either (or both) of these.
VG
Note: Sweeps S4-S6, can be widened if one wishes to expand inclusion of guns further out of center.
How this one? Vortex likes?
So-S0: 33.768-33.900 (wide, default, always engaged)
S1 34.593-34-770
S2 34.774-34.833
S3 35.394-35.615
[QUOTE=Electronicdude;914824]Thank you so much so I'll try second one. What does second seem to do better? Is it because you but same freqs in a row?
How much better do you think this is then
Truthfully, I can't quantify it. I would just suggest that you try one or the other and see what you personally care for. Others have also presented their own sweep patterns meaning there are plenty of ways to "skin this cat"!
VG
ALERT: Purchase the latest Veil G5 Direct from the Manufacturer or from one of our Authorized Dealers at the Veil Store.
Stay informed with the latest industry news and product reviews Veil Guy's Radar Detector Reviews.
Experience real-world encounters as they actually happened on the open road, from the pioneer of this bonafide real-world testing format. Visit Veil Guy's radar detector videos.
Socialize with the Veil Guy: Google+, Facebook
Bookmarks