If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above.
You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed.
To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.
^Could you describe the nature of your encounter? I'm very interested in that situation that you described to me.
By nature I mean, where the leo was locating, was he facing towards you or away? That kind of stuff.
__________________
aka known as Spectre on www.radar-detector.net
2004 Hyundai Elantra
Beltronics STI-R
Saves with this detector: 9
Whistler XTR-695
Saves with this detector: 7
Whistler XTR-105
Saves with this detector: 3
Whistler DE 1732
Saves with this detector: 4
Cobra 9960G
Saves with this detector:15
Cheetah GPS Mirror
Speeding tickets: 0
point is that shows nothing they leak you should know this even a lil leak is bad when it comes to testing I have seen them leak and cause my Rd
not to go off till the last sec in testing
The remote mounted Belscorts definitely do not interfere with the windshield mounted RDs. I've driven at least 50,000 miles running one remote RD and one windshield mouted RD at the same time and not noticed any interference between them whatsoever. I think The Veil Guy could improve his testing, but not because there is any interference going on between the RDs on the front of the car and the RD on the windshield.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idontgo55
Would You GOL do testing like that?????? The answer is of course no you can correct me if I'm wrong !!!!!!!!!
No, GoL would not do testing like that. GoL does controlled testing. Jimbonzzz makes sure that every factor that can be controlled, is controlled, so that the results are as accurate as humanly possible. What The Veil Guy does is real world comparison testing, where nothing is controlled. These are two totally different concepts.
Mustang GT Convertible, 9500ci, Veil, V1 3.812 hardwired with X and K off, Laser Interceptor Quad. 9500ix confiscated by the woman and hardwired high in her car.
point is that shows nothing they leak you should know this even a lil leak is bad when it comes to testing I have seen them leak and cause my Rd
not to go off till the last sec in testing
The remote mounted Belscorts definitely do not interfere with the windshield mounted RDs. I've driven at least 50,000 miles running one remote RD and one windshield mouted RD at the same time and not noticed any interference between them whatsoever. I think The Veil Guy could improve his testing, but not because there is any interference going on between the RDs on the front of the car and the RD on the windshield.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Idontgo55
Would You GOL do testing like that?????? The answer is of course no you can correct me if I'm wrong !!!!!!!!!
No, GoL would not do testing like that. GoL does controlled testing. Jimbonzzz makes sure that every factor that can be controlled, is controlled, so that the results are as accurate as humanly possible. What The Veil Guy does is real world comparison testing, where nothing is controlled. These are two totally different concepts.
I never said they did the Window ones do he runs 3 sometimes at once ...a Test like that isn't worth the time
as for the remote mounted I don't know we never ran a test with a car with say a v1 in front of a car with a remote mounted to see if it hurts where it picks it up at
But We will next time because I want to know if the v1 leaks enough to mess up the ci range like it did my ix
__________________ 9500IX User
v1.2 Firmware about time Zr3's Jammer's
youtube.com/user/Lidartesting
^Let us know the results of your testing. I love testing that is done to see if conventional wisdom is incorrect, although I don't believe it is in this case.
__________________
aka known as Spectre on www.radar-detector.net
2004 Hyundai Elantra
Beltronics STI-R
Saves with this detector: 9
Whistler XTR-695
Saves with this detector: 7
Whistler XTR-105
Saves with this detector: 3
Whistler DE 1732
Saves with this detector: 4
Cobra 9960G
Saves with this detector:15
Cheetah GPS Mirror
Speeding tickets: 0
Ok so i was skimming through this thread with the hopes of a good conclusion as to what whistler would be the best to buy, and so far i still have no clue. Great information and great discussion though.
So, save the $$ and go for a XTR-695? Or get all the features and go for a PRO-68SE?
I dont like the idea of X being confused for K, ether one not do this?
--------
My 2 cents to some comments made:
1- Every Escort i have owned have lasted with no issues except for my 7yr old 8500.
2- Some RD's will interfere with the 9500ci, they just don't tend to interfere with its performance.
3- A longer warranty from my experience doesn't always mean its a better product, and usually doesn't.
-To embrace technology is not to blindly accept it. We must always question technology but never be afraid to use it. -No one detector is perfect for everyone. And the one you don’t like may be perfect for someone else.
Ok so i was skimming through this thread with the hopes of a good conclusion as to what whistler would be the best to buy, and so far i still have no clue. Great information and great discussion though.
So, save the $$ and go for a XTR-695? Or get all the features and go for a PRO-68SE? get the pro78se, reason is that it is more sensitive then the normal C platform and has more features then the 68se.
I dont like the idea of X being confused for K, ether one not do this? all whistlers can do that becasue for them to have fast reactivity they scan x and k together and ka separate.
--------
My 2 cents to some comments made:
1- Every Escort i have owned have lasted with no issues except for my 7yr old 8500.
2- Some RD's will interfere with the 9500ci, they just don't tend to interfere with its performance.
3- A longer warranty from my experience doesn't always mean its a better product, and usually doesn't.
in red
__________________ V1Highway / Travel detector - 3.864 , POP on, All bands on, Hard wired, Mounted above rear view mirror. Modded COLOR concealed display by me (Languy99**HINT**HINT**), Blinder M47 - custom install JTG/JFG Bel 995 S7 City Detector - High mount, Hard Wire, X-band off Bel 955 M4 Dad's car - High mount, Hard wired, City No X, POP off, NOW WITH TSR Whistler XTR-695 - Testing detector Whistler Pro 58 - Donated CB Radio - Highway / Travel- Galaxy DX-959, Cobra 19DX-III(backup), Wilson Little Wil Antenna GPS - Highway/Travel - Garmin Nuvi 260 2010.20 maps - With Trapster Database Cell - Wilson Cell antenna 6 dBi gain VVME HID Lights - for greater visibility and safety
Ok so i was skimming through this thread with the hopes of a good conclusion as to what whistler would be the best to buy, and so far i still have no clue. Great information and great discussion though.
So, save the $$ and go for a XTR-695? Or get all the features and go for a PRO-68SE? get the pro78se, reason is that it is more sensitive then the normal C platform and has more features then the 68se.
I dont like the idea of X being confused for K, ether one not do this? all whistlers can do that becasue for them to have fast reactivity they scan x and k together and ka separate.
--------
My 2 cents to some comments made:
1- Every Escort i have owned have lasted with no issues except for my 7yr old 8500.
2- Some RD's will interfere with the 9500ci, they just don't tend to interfere with its performance.
3- A longer warranty from my experience doesn't always mean its a better product, and usually doesn't.
in red
Sweet! new toy, that will be my next thing to play with. I didn't see it on whistler's sight?
-To embrace technology is not to blindly accept it. We must always question technology but never be afraid to use it. -No one detector is perfect for everyone. And the one you don’t like may be perfect for someone else.
Radar Roy's Detector and Jammer Buyer's Guide!
For pros or novices, this FREE 22 page consumer report is a must read for anyone considering any speed counter measure device. Radar Detector Buyer's Guide
Visit RadarBusters for all your Speed Countermeasure Equipment RadarBusters.com
Re: New Detector Recommendation 
I didn't see it on whistler's sight?
