Re: Blinder Xtreme Series In action
Quote:
Originally Posted by steagall1000
Again, careful here - both are on the old, defunct, 0-suffix units.
Now that's a good show! :D
As with your next video, this is precisely the kind of proof that Blinder needs to supply, in order to satisfy the customers who are smart enough to research their purchases in-depth, on Forums such as these.
BTW, on a personal note, I grew up in that area, and usually come back once a year or so to visit my parents - I know where that is! :)
This is the kind of definitive proof that Blinder needs, stegall1000, and I applaud your efforts on their behalf.
BTW, if you'll recall, I originally wanted to further discuss this video, to break down several areas of concern I had regarding the PL-II's targeting - and seeming delay (and in one case, total failure to lock: on the black Mitsubishi Diamante) in locking to-target.
Upon further research, it seems that what you'd experienced was totally textbook - that some cars just do not return a LIDAR signature as readily as others, and that, to an extent, this does occur randomly. Furthermore, the lack of return - TOTALLY - from yet other random vehicles is also not only possible, but actually, not completely infrequent.
With this data, I am satisfied that your testing was indeed well done. Good deal! :)
Once more, careful - another friendly word.... outrun's stuff may not be received too kindly here, either.
And even beside this issue, there's also, again, the concern of the 0-suffix units being used in some of these cited demos. Again, the focus now needs to be on the 5-suffix units, to show, without a shadow of doubt, that they perform at least equally as well as the defunct 0-suffix series.
