I too was surprised by the "poor" performance of the 78
Printable View
I too was surprised by the "poor" performance of the 78
thanks guys for the donations. EVERY donation helps and is encouraging to see support. Hopefully we can save enough to buy RETAIL jammers AT LEAST a Blinder and an LI
Yeah when you save up for a looonggg time from a crappy job, you want to appreciate something you buy more, but when you see it for what it is (the numbers), it makes for a sad day :(...Ohhh well :) At least it is better than his pro 73Quote:
Originally Posted by strmchaxsr
Send it to Mike B he can really massage the Pro 78 and make it better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Ven0mizer
Thanks for the hard work guys.
This is wrong. When talking about distances vs sensitivity (in dB - logarithmic), it is the difference in distance that counts, NOT the ratio. This is because the signal is is relative to the distance squared.Quote:
Originally Posted by guysoflidar.com
Therefore, it is expected that (in ideal conditions) the DIFFERENCE in distances with / without foam be the same. NOT THE RATIO.
So, the question is, how did the prime rib do?
Did it beat all comers hands down or what?
Hell yeah finished firstQuote:
Originally Posted by BigFloppy
dude you don't even know. that's by far the best meal of my life! great it's 10:30PM and I'm thinking about driving to Cleveland to get some, Happya$$ tell the woman to get to cooking haha.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigFloppy
PrimeRib owns all! many pretenders but nothing can touch it.
I'll be there in 4 hours. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by thestaton
J/
Wow, the 9500I did awesome! :shock: Very impressive, I'm glad I keep POP off. :D
Now someone needs to find another way to beat up on the 9500I so the next tests you do it will smoke the V1. :wink: