GOLs are the only independent testing group that I trust completely and I'm thankful they are around.
They spelled out the source of the jammers and the special circumstances of any tested.
THEY ALSO KNOW HOW TO USE THE CAPS LOCK KEY
Printable View
GOLs are the only independent testing group that I trust completely and I'm thankful they are around.
They spelled out the source of the jammers and the special circumstances of any tested.
THEY ALSO KNOW HOW TO USE THE CAPS LOCK KEY
Quote:
Originally Posted by spankyaf
ASK URSELF THIS QUESTION MISTER ROCKET SCIENTIST
IF GOL DIDN'T TEST THE LASER JAMMER, WOULD THE MEMBERS OF THE FORUM WHO HAVE BEEN RIPPED OFF BE GOING THROUGH THESE PROBLEMS?
THE ANSWER IS NO.
NOW GO BACK TO SCHOOL.
It was NEVER our intention to mislead anyone and we have learned a very valuable lesson going into the future. We will update our website. We will do things very differently in the future. Thanks for your constructive criticism. We appreciate this type of feedback.
TeamQuack, what is up with all the "shouting" via all-caps? I think that you are the one who needs to go back to school. Take some socialism classes in order to learn how to communicate both more clearly and effectively to others.Quote:
Originally Posted by TeamQuack
IT IS NOT GUYS OF LIDAR'S FAULT THAT PEOPLE ARE STUPID.Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ
No matter how we presented the results, there will always be people who are too stupid. It's not our responsibility to protect people from themselves!
WRONG. The first mention of it in the section near the top of the page, in the section entitled "The Jammers" which details which jammers were tested, and where they came from, and how they were installed.Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ
The fact that the LI was a prototype has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the test methodology.Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ
1. I don't see how "development unit" differs from "prototype", especially when we used the same language in "The Jammers" section! There was absolutely no intent to mislead anyone, and it would be a BIG stretch to think that anyone could be misled due to such wording.Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ
2. We said "The Laser Interceptor was a "development unit", which could be updated with new software in the field. How does that imply that software upgrading would be possible on a retail unit? In fact, the very opposite is true!
Yep. It was a "comparison test", with several products tested under the exact same set of controlled conditions. Therefore, all of the results were reported together in the results summary.Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ
If someone would have actually read the page, they would already know this. There is NO reason to repeat every detail about each jammer every time it is mentioned on the page, especially when there is a section DEDICATED to this! Every time a jammer is mentioned, do we need to say "The Laser Interceptor prototype, provided by Laser Interceptor, with the heads mounted blah blah blah"... that's just stupid!!Quote:
Originally Posted by TQ
All we do is test the products and report the results exactly as they happen, and that is exactly what we did! Bottom line: Guys of LIDAR disclosed everything 100%.
If people don't like our tests, or they feel misled, they are of course free to compleyely ignore our tests altogether and make their purchasing decisions based on whatever set of criteria makes them feel comfortable. We don't make or lose money either way, and we test because we enjoy it.
ALSO: WHAT DO YOUR POSTS HAVE TO DO WITH THE TOPIC OF THIS THREAD, WHICH IS THE OUTRIGHT LIES AND LIBELOUS STATEMENTS ABOUT US MADE BY CERTAIN PARTIES? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
thank you happyQuote:
Originally Posted by happya$$
as i have mentioned before i have a degree in physics and i'm currently getting my masters so you know of all people, I APPRICIATE YOU GUYS WORK. i appricaite the science of it. the methods you use. and again, the only reason i have been here is because of you guys.
as you have seen this is nothing agsint you or GOL, i feel that you guys are being used by LI. thank you for understanding where i come from with my criticism. i will stop with all my rant's now. thank you again.
If someone told me I needed to take some "Socialism Classes" I would beat the crap out of them. Communism is perfect on paper but in real life its a failure, just like the LI and the scam being run on people who buy the "LIE" or lets say...."LI"...same difference
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEM-TEK
Are you an idiot or something, he means this in terms of relating to other humans not political ideologies. But considering pretty much every single one of your posts, you should definately look into taking some.
Goodbye. :P
He doesn't need Socialism Classes. Instead, he needs some serious medical attention for his mental conditions.Quote:
Originally Posted by SmaartAasSaabr
:lol: :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by SmaartAasSaabr